Skip to comments.
Tales of Tape [Wead]
Philadelphia Daily News ^
| February 22, 2005
| Stu Bykofsky
Posted on 02/22/2005 10:03:17 AM PST by Quilla
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Charles Krauthammer addressed Bill Kristol's comments on Brit's panel last night quite well - Wead is a sleaze.
1
posted on
02/22/2005 10:03:21 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: Quilla
You can't blame them for getting excited...after all, its like finding your dad's playboy collection under his mattress while he and mom are out to dinner.
Its pathetic, but exciting for them.
I am already hearing out-of-context bits and pieces on the national news.
The media loves it. "Hey, we have a quote saying "you don't want kids telling their parents 'President Bush smoked pot, so why can't I?'.... They left out how he got to that line of reason.
2
posted on
02/22/2005 10:06:43 AM PST
by
Paloma_55
To: Quilla
3
posted on
02/22/2005 10:09:30 AM PST
by
Enterprise
(President Bush thought Wead was a friend. Turns out he was just a big fat tape worm.)
To: Enterprise
Maggot Bump.
The publisher made me do it. DUhhh!
4
posted on
02/22/2005 10:11:04 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
To: Quilla
This is a great post. These tapes only serve to emphasize the integrity Bush possesses and the lack thereof of Wead. To say his publisher made him do it is a cheap and sleazy out for him. This is just pure publicity for him.
5
posted on
02/22/2005 10:11:34 AM PST
by
SolidRedState
(I can't think of a new tagline, so I'll just post without one.)
To: Quilla
If there was anything politically useful to Democrats or the liberal MSM from these tapes, it would have caught fire by now. The story is now 3 days old.
The truth is, they didn't find any gunpowder in this story----only wet rags. And such was the case in early November, the Democrats and liberals have another hangover. This one must hurt.
6
posted on
02/22/2005 10:12:30 AM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: Quilla
Curious since I didn't see Brit's show last night - What were Kristol and Krauthammer's comments?
7
posted on
02/22/2005 10:15:05 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(DU: ''Reality sucks. That's the problem. We want another reality.'')
To: SolidRedState
For someone to trade their friendship with President Bush for a few bucks is just unfathomable.
8
posted on
02/22/2005 10:15:31 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: Quilla
lemme see, Linda Tripp taping conversations at eh behest of le officials implicating the president with sexual harassments - BAD
this dude taping conversations with bush implicating - what? (the tapes don't seem to say hwat we're told they say) - GOOD
another liberal double standard?
9
posted on
02/22/2005 10:17:31 AM PST
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
To: Quilla
Krauthammer was disgusted, considered Wead the lowest of the low, releasing the tapes for his personal monetary benefit. Kristol had spoken with many on the hill and opinions ranged from goofball to sleazeball. (I don't recall him sharing his own sentiments directly.) Krauthammer simply ended the segment by summarizing with a single word - sleaze.
10
posted on
02/22/2005 10:20:29 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: Quilla
Just another greedy journalist out to sell his soul for a buck.
11
posted on
02/22/2005 10:21:20 AM PST
by
sr4402
To: Republican Red
Oops, sorry Red. My post at #10 was supposed to be a reply to you.
12
posted on
02/22/2005 10:21:30 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: Quilla
I figured it out, thanks.
Sorry I missed Brit's show. Krauthammer is my favorite panelist. You never know what is going to come out of Kristol's mouth though. I was hoping he wasn't taking up for Wead.
13
posted on
02/22/2005 10:24:24 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(DU: ''Reality sucks. That's the problem. We want another reality.'')
To: Quilla
For someone to trade their friendship with President Bush for a few bucks is just unfathomable. I guess "No harm, no foul" but I am sure he won't be getting any invites to the White House or to Crawford for that matter, anymore.
14
posted on
02/22/2005 10:27:18 AM PST
by
SolidRedState
(I can't think of a new tagline, so I'll just post without one.)
To: Quilla
Is this guy wead's first name Richard? That would make him Dick wead, wouldn't it?
15
posted on
02/22/2005 10:35:33 AM PST
by
jmaroneps37
(In dealing with liberals remember When you wrestle with a pig, you both get dirty and he loves it.)
To: Quilla
I've heard Doug Wead speak on a couple of occasions. I'm extremely disappointed. I would never have thought he would do something like this.
16
posted on
02/22/2005 10:36:13 AM PST
by
Egon
(Government is a guard-dog to be fed, not a cow to be milked.)
To: Quilla
I was looking forward to the release of his book and intended to buy it. Now I will not and will encourage others to do likewise.
17
posted on
02/22/2005 10:49:32 AM PST
by
msnimje
To: msnimje
Absolutely! I will not be purchasing this or any other book by Wead.
18
posted on
02/22/2005 11:01:48 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: Paloma_55
You can't blame them for getting excited...after all, its like finding your dad's playboy collection under his mattress while he and mom are out to dinner. LOL!
To: Quilla
There's no traction in these tapes. Bush says nothing of great interest to those trying to trap him. The chief impression most people will get from this affair is that Weadon is a sleaze.
He will lose his natural audience, and I doubt if he will find a new one. If he did this for money and career, he made a bad mistake.
20
posted on
02/22/2005 11:34:28 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson