Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anybody have problems installing Norton System Works on AMD sysstem?
Boris | 02-28-2005 | Boris

Posted on 02/28/2005 8:09:59 AM PST by boris

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: boris

If you installed SP2 for your XP, that could be your problem. Try running Win 9x and see if that solves your problems, or just uninstall SP2 and see if that works.


41 posted on 02/28/2005 9:32:16 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris; Brilliant

Norton is junk. Try eAcceleration "Stopsign" It's very, very good. http://www.eacceleration.com


42 posted on 02/28/2005 9:33:05 AM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeeHarvey
That is, unless you know how to disable everything in NSW except Norton AntiVirus. Why? Mainly because NSW is a complete system resource hog, and it'll slow your entire machine down.

I finally Threw my NSW in the closet and use Norton Anti virus Corporate edition and it works fine on both my AMD and Intel (Windows ME and Windows 98), I don't like XP.

43 posted on 02/28/2005 9:40:38 AM PST by oldbrowser (They're not the MSM.........they are the AGENDA MEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: boris
Maybe you or someone else can help me. I downloaded Microsoft's spybot program from their website yesterday. After doing that, I couldn't access FR (I'm at work now) and so I uninstalled it. But I still can't get to FR. It says it's denied because too many weighted phrases or something similar. Any advice?

Carolyn

44 posted on 02/28/2005 9:47:36 AM PST by CDHart (The world has become a lunatic asylum and the lunatics are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smartaleck

Don't hold your breath. I've had problems with NSW on Intel. They were easier to deal with than McAfee, but still had them.

You'd think that these guys would focus on putting out a product that works instead of putting out a product with 15 extra add-on programs that most people don't need.

Maybe they should stop outsourcing to India?


45 posted on 02/28/2005 10:08:41 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: boris

What version of NSW are you using? Is it XP compatible? I got a big surprise when I installed XP and had to ditch my NSW 2001.

Also, do you have a previous version of NSW on your computer? I've had some bad experience trying to install NSW if there was as little as a single file remaining from a previous installation.

It's never been my experience that the micro-P had any affect on the applications, but I suppose it can happen.


46 posted on 02/28/2005 10:10:39 AM PST by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BullDog108

Yes sorry...aimed at the wrong guy!!

MD


47 posted on 02/28/2005 10:33:07 AM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: boris

Another thumbs down on Norton System Works. It's too unstable.

Listen to the advice from Ladysmith in post 13. AVG, Spybot and Ad-Aware.

Bill


48 posted on 02/28/2005 10:36:18 AM PST by BillDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
The problem is I rely on Ghost, and elements of NU. I don't need the rest. I've given up on speed disk; now use O&O (which is Microsoft's uncrippled). I use Registry First Aid instead of Win Doctor, etc.

However there is some functionality I would still like to have.

I manually removed all references to "Symantec", "Norton", and "NSW" from my registry; removed all traces of files from the PC and NSW 2005 STILL will not install.

--Boris

49 posted on 02/28/2005 10:45:11 AM PST by boris (The deadliest weapon of mass destruction in history is a leftist with a word processor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BullDog108

Amen to that! Norton has some serious issues. Any company that can't get their own firewall to work with their own A/V suite cannot be trusted.


50 posted on 02/28/2005 10:53:15 AM PST by Space Wrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boris

I have never owned an Intel PC. Every computer of mine has always been AMD.

That said, I have used previous versions of System Works on both Intel and AMD systems and found no differences in Norton's performance.

I'm not sure what may be causing your issues but I feel pretty confident that it's not a processor issue.

This may not apply to you but I have seen machines imaged with Ghost exhibit very strange symptoms if the HALs are different from the host machine.

Any messages when install fails?


51 posted on 02/28/2005 10:58:51 AM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
I lost my paid subscription when my harddrive died; the expired free trial version kept annoying me until I uninstalled it.

My computer works better and I won't go back.

52 posted on 02/28/2005 10:58:55 AM PST by Old Professer (A man's conscience is like his garden, it his and his alone to tend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BullDog108

ONLY problem I have is that Norton tells me it found a virus and got rid of it. But when I click OK it pops back up to tell me about it again, and again, and again, and again, and ag...........


53 posted on 02/28/2005 11:00:55 AM PST by N. Theknow (Trusting CBS to fact check is like asking Michael Jackson to baby sit your kid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RJL

"my experience with four AMD systems over several years is that I've never had software not work and the systems have all been very dependable and stable."

Ditto for me. And they run a lot cooler. My most recent is a 64 bit AMD Athlon.


54 posted on 02/28/2005 11:01:37 AM PST by IamConservative (To worry is to misuse your imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative
Ditto for me. And they run a lot cooler. My most recent is a 64 bit AMD Athlon.

I built my AMD 64 bit Athlon 3400+ system last April.

It has very good performance even using only 32 bit programs. I downloaded MS 64 bit beta OS but never did anything with it.

Are you running any 64 bit programs? If so, any comments or observations?

55 posted on 02/28/2005 12:08:51 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RJL

I haven't run anything 64 bit as yet. Waiting for Longhorn I suppose. It defintely runs better and faster than my P4 machine and as I said, does not inflict third degree burns on anything that touches the case.


56 posted on 02/28/2005 1:17:44 PM PST by IamConservative (To worry is to misuse your imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RJL
I downloaded MS 64 bit beta OS but never did anything with it.

Install it and dual boot. It's kinda cool to play with.

57 posted on 02/28/2005 1:27:21 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Got Gas?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: boris

I had a similar problem. Norton stinks for me.

It slowed down my ability to click hyperlinks in emails. It would take a full minute or two to launch the browser. I uninstalled Norton and it is back to normal now.


58 posted on 02/28/2005 1:34:01 PM PST by krb (ad hominem arguments are for stupid people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Don't have enough bad things to say about McAfee. Spent a couple of hours on the phone with the Indians with Symantec. Mildly happy with Symantec but 100% more happy than I was with McAfee (Those bXXtards never got back to me once I went to level 2 problems.


59 posted on 02/28/2005 1:39:46 PM PST by conservaDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: boris

The AMD system isn't the problem. Something else is going on. I haven't used an Intel system for my personal machine since maybe a 386 or 486 and I have never had any compatibility issues.
I am also a computer consultant and recommend AMD systems to all of my clients.


60 posted on 02/28/2005 1:44:13 PM PST by billakay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson