Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Flame away.
1 posted on 03/28/2005 6:54:08 PM PST by 4.1O dana super trac pak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

GO TOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YES!!!


246 posted on 03/29/2005 5:52:32 PM PST by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Bingo. Got my vote. As if I'd vote for Frist...
274 posted on 03/30/2005 2:32:21 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

I'd vote for him on the illegal alien issue alone, over any of the laughable RINOs running.


275 posted on 03/30/2005 2:34:19 AM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

He's got my vote.


291 posted on 03/30/2005 11:42:17 AM PST by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

He's got my vote.


292 posted on 03/30/2005 11:42:21 AM PST by Rytwyng (we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

If Tancredo is the nominee, I may vote for him. Then again,
given his violation of his term-limit pledge, I may not. If one cannot trust him in a small thing like a promise to get out of Congress after a certain number of terms, why in the hell should I trust him with command of US nuclear forces?


300 posted on 03/30/2005 1:57:42 PM PST by Poohbah (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak

Don't think he is a winnable candidate, but I would not mind him in the early primaries keeping the illegal immigration issue in the news.

What ever the field for Republicans will be, we need to have all the competition drop out early so ONE candidate can face the ONE candidate the Democrats will have.


302 posted on 03/30/2005 2:06:20 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Voted YES on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortion except to save mother’s life. (Oct 2003)
Voted YES on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted YES on funding for health providers who don't provide abortion info. (Sep 2002)
Voted YES on banning human cloning, including medical research. (Jul 2001)
Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Voted YES on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
Voted YES on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
Voted YES on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)

SOUNDS LIKE A WINNER TO ME!
312 posted on 03/31/2005 10:44:23 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson