Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HOW MUCH IS THAT F-15 IN THE WINDOW? - (U.S. military outspends next 13 nations combined)
NCPA.ORG ^ | MAY 12, 2005 | CHARLES PENA

Posted on 05/13/2005 6:42:23 PM PDT by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: RobFromGa
I have heard that the French and German militaries are operated in large part as quasi-welfare institutions with a very high ratio of middle-aged beaurocrats.

Last time I looked, we were spending more on health and pension benefits for our retired military than the entire French or German defense budget.

61 posted on 05/13/2005 8:45:32 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

We can either pay for our military victories in dollars or in lives. I prefer dollars. It's one of the things that makes us the greatest and most moral nation on the planet...


62 posted on 05/13/2005 8:46:25 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Still teaching... or a reasonable facsimile thereof...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppelin
Just a frilly minute. Australia's defence expenditure in 2005-6 will be $A17.5 billion (that's $US13.3 billion). even back in 2003-4 it was $A15 billion.

We're 12th, dammit!

63 posted on 05/13/2005 8:46:57 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity - MLK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Read "Cry from the deep", the story of the Kursk disaster, and see what the Russian defense spending has done to their submarine fleet. It's obscene.


64 posted on 05/13/2005 8:47:44 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

That's what I said, without even seeing the PDF


65 posted on 05/13/2005 8:49:57 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity - MLK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

I am not sure of the distinction. Do they not spend funds on offensive weapons? Do they have fighter planes, long range bombers? Japan is entitled to defend its borders as any other nation. Why is their defense not military as you stated?


66 posted on 05/13/2005 8:50:15 PM PDT by amosmoses (For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. Romans 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Swedes have quite a lot of fairly advanced weaponry.

Except that it is all comes in an assemble-it-yourself flat pack.

67 posted on 05/13/2005 8:52:24 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
What's Mr. Pena's cost/benefit analysis on preventing a nuke from going off in an American city?

For sure.

Also, dollars spent is a poor way of judging military capability. They make TVs and any other commodities in China for pennies. $50 billion spent in China on the military is like the U.S. spending $500 billion. It is NOT dollars spent, it is the ability to project force.

For example, China's navy has expanded at a far faster rate than our navy (which is actually shrinking).

How can this "brain" from CATO be so stupid as to use dollars to compare military capability from one nation vs. the U.S.? For God's sake, for the cost of one F-15, China can build ten latest generation fighters for the same amount of money. Has CATO gone stupid on us?

68 posted on 05/13/2005 8:58:15 PM PDT by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
It's a lot cheaper to (threaten) to launch nukes than it is to stop them everywhere in the world.

Juvenile libertarians.

69 posted on 05/13/2005 9:04:35 PM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "Very well put, AD. As usual." -- Howlin; "ROFL!" -- Dan from Michigan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
"Has CATO gone stupid on us?",br>

I question a lot of Pena's positions. If I'm not mistaken, he and his CATO organization are more or less for open borders.

70 posted on 05/13/2005 9:14:13 PM PDT by CHARLITE (Not gonna be happy until the Hillster is sent packing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Our government has spent $404,000,000,000 on protecting the world. Congress continues full speed ahead to run us into more and more debt. I wonder how many years it is going to take for the American dollar to be worth the amount of a Mexican Peso?

Silver and gold keep looking better and better as an investment.


71 posted on 05/13/2005 10:29:38 PM PDT by 2nd_Amendment_Defender ("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
We need to outspend the rest of the world combined. We have no real friends when the chips are down, other than Australia and Israel.

And Japan. Agree though. Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN. Dissolve the NEA as well.

72 posted on 05/13/2005 10:33:39 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
If we do not, I believe we will fight them in the next ten years or maybe sooner depending on the Taiwan issue. I believe we will win in any case, but that the cost will be much greater than if we act accordingly now. Just my opinion.

Agreed. Our country needs to withdraw from the "One china" sham and Shanghai Communiques. Make Taiwan stronger (at least as strong as Japan militarily) and form a strategic triangle to counter China: A new SEATO. Taiwan should become part of the National Missile Defense system like Japan is. In addition to that Taiwan and Japan need nuclear weapons.

73 posted on 05/13/2005 10:43:05 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 2nd_Amendment_Defender
Our government has spent $404,000,000,000 on protecting the world. Congress continues full speed ahead to run us into more and more debt. I wonder how many years it is going to take for the American dollar to be worth the amount of a Mexican Peso?

Keep the military spending (boost it back to Reagan levels). Dissolve wasteful programs like the UN, NEA, PBS etc.

74 posted on 05/13/2005 10:49:06 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
The vast majority is salaries and benefits not procurements.
75 posted on 05/13/2005 11:13:50 PM PDT by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
"We're 12th, dammit"

Quality, not quantity!

76 posted on 05/13/2005 11:16:30 PM PDT by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

I though it was 8 countries last year?


77 posted on 05/13/2005 11:51:49 PM PDT by texasflower ("America's vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one." President George W. Bush 01/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

But we are NOT building up our force structure and readiness. We are reducing procurment on the F-22 and other weapon systems, and we are even eliminating weapon systems. We are cutting back on our military bases.

The Defense dollars are going to the war in Iraq and that does NOT help build our force projection.

Ronald Reagan spent money on Defense to build up our military capability since his spending went into new procurement, design and development. George Bush has reduced our military capability, even though total spending on Defense has increased. The problem is the money is NOT going into areas that increase our capability, it is going to fight the war in Iraq and logistics of moving supplies, etc. In fact, billions are going to other nations as bribe money (like to Pakistan) to pretend that they are fighting the war on terror.

The fact is, our military capability has shrunk under George Bush while Russia and China have increased their force projuection capability, and N. Korea and Iran have developed (or will develop soon) nukes.


78 posted on 05/14/2005 5:19:17 AM PDT by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888; Paul_Denton
Agreed...that was my point. Unless we increase our posture, then it is only a matter of time before those beligerent nations who are rapidly increasing their posture will challenge us directly. They are already doing so indirectly.

...and with so much of our manufacturing moved offshore, it will take a herculean, World War II type effort to catch up and put the enemies down.

That is the whole point of what I am trying to say.

The Chinese are on a big upswing. It would be very painful at this point economically to cut their funding off, because we have engrained our own economy so much into theirs...but that pain will pale compared to what may well eventually come in terms of open conflict...anbother World War IMHO...and not just against terror groups, but against nations who ally themselves with them (China, N. Korea, Iran, Syria, Venezuela, and potentially several more).

All of that is the principle reason I wrote the fictional Dragon's Fury story.

79 posted on 05/14/2005 6:50:43 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: amosmoses
I am not sure of the distinction. Do they not spend funds on offensive weapons? Do they have fighter planes, long range bombers?

The Japanses constitution limits its forces to a "self defense" role. They have given that term a fairly broad reading, however, with Japanese troops having taken part in 'self defense' missions in Iraq. Long range bombers and ballistic missiles would definitely be out.

Their naval (sorry, make that 'maritime self defense') forces are heavy in anti - air and anti - submarine capabilities, much weaker in shore bombardment assets. They do, however, see protection of strategic sea lanes within the 'self defense' sphere.

80 posted on 05/14/2005 8:00:28 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson