Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Gives Way on Iran’s Nuclear Bomb, Therefore Backs ElBaradei’s Reappointment
DEBKAfile ^ | June 13, 2005, 11:25 PM (GMT+02:00)

Posted on 07/03/2005 10:49:29 PM PDT by strategofr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
What I figured. I could see it when we threw in our support beind the European initiative, a few weeks or so ago.
1 posted on 07/03/2005 10:49:29 PM PDT by strategofr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: strategofr

They may as well. Europe will be affected in the near future by Iran's weapons projects, but we won't. By the time Iran's nukes have enough range to reach us, we should have our anti-ballistic missile defense working well and sufficiently staged, though.


2 posted on 07/03/2005 10:55:11 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

DEBKA Alert!! My BS meter is pegged.


3 posted on 07/03/2005 11:00:58 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
There are other ways to deliver nuclear weapons than missiles.

We have much to worry about.

4 posted on 07/03/2005 11:04:47 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: familyop

"They may as well. Europe will be affected in the near future by Iran's weapons projects, but we won't. By the time Iran's nukes have enough range to reach us, we should have our anti-ballistic missile defense working well and sufficiently staged, though"

The purpose of iran's nukes is defensive. They make it unlikely the US will try to effect regime change, and allow Iran to proceed full speed ahead with support for terrorists.


In addition, Iran is simply being given Russian missles of ever-longer range (probably) and pretending to develope them. Their range is increasing very fast and we still don't have the technology developed for effective national anti-missle defense---or know when we will have it. in addition, a national anti-missle defense will be hugely expensive.


5 posted on 07/03/2005 11:04:51 PM PDT by strategofr (What did happen to those 293 boxes of secret FBI files (esp on Senators) Hillary stole?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01
There are other ways to deliver nuclear weapons than missiles.

Correct.

....and they can sell them to terrorist orgs to do the dirty work.

6 posted on 07/03/2005 11:25:32 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

The iranians have said repeatedly that it is their muslim duty to acquire nukes and use them on Israel as soon as they get them Hardly defensive only.


7 posted on 07/03/2005 11:48:31 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

After applying my standard Debka credibility discount to the article, I give it a 1% probability score.


8 posted on 07/04/2005 12:00:52 AM PDT by omniscient
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

Missile Defense Agency
http://www.mda.mil/mdalink/html/mdalink.html


9 posted on 07/04/2005 12:12:04 AM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

Consider the source before you go assuming too much.


10 posted on 07/04/2005 12:54:01 AM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

Need sleep - save for tomorrow.


11 posted on 07/04/2005 1:43:42 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (As Iraqi's stand up - We will stand down. . President Bush, 6/28/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

ping


12 posted on 07/04/2005 1:49:14 AM PDT by stradivarius ("If a donkey brays at you, don't bray at him." - George Herbert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Well this pretty well guarantees that Israel will blow them into the previous millennium. America can then solemly inform the glass parking lot which used to be Iran, "We told you so."


13 posted on 07/04/2005 1:55:39 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Irans nuke won't be delivered by missle ace. It will come in via a container ship. Probably but ot necessarily into N.Y. harbour.


14 posted on 07/04/2005 3:55:27 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

Maybe the U.S. is a punk but I don't believe Israel will sit on their collective asses and let Iran nuke them.


15 posted on 07/04/2005 3:56:50 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

Defensive purposes?
What planet you living on there sport?

Iran has three objectives:
1. Nuke Isreal
2.Nuke America
3. Mideast and Muslim world domination.


16 posted on 07/04/2005 4:01:01 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Russia's suitcase nukes have shown that a nuke does not need to be big, or overly heavy. Getting one of Mexico's knowledgeable coyotes to carry it across the border in an old Volkswagen and then set it off in, say, Dallas, would suffice. Iran doesn't even have to make the nuke on its soil; it can outsource the job to somebody else willing to be vaporized for Allah.


17 posted on 07/04/2005 4:08:13 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: strategofr; All
On Iran in particular, the Bush administration has concluded that turning back the clock on its nuclear bomb project is no longer realistic.

I missed this announcement.

Top officials Vice President Dick Cheney, defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, secretary of state Condoleezza Rice and national security adviser Stephen Hadley are therefore busy consolidating the administration’s achievements to date and working on stopgap remedies that will hold up until after the next presidential election. Bush will then wind up his presidency on a high note and the public will expect his successor to solidify his gains.

Whoever wrote this drivel should go sit in a corner and shut up. Sheesh, he even forgot the token "according to an anonymous WH source" to make this somewhat believable.

18 posted on 07/04/2005 7:40:31 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (As Iraqi's stand up - We will stand down. . President Bush, 6/28/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omniscient
After applying my standard Debka credibility discount to the article, I give it a 1% probability score.

That's a bit generous, doncha think?

19 posted on 07/04/2005 7:43:32 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

"Sheesh, he even forgot the token "according to an anonymous WH source" to make this somewhat believable."

This does not need to be added in DebkaFile, since nearly everything they write is from an annonymous source or a guess. A lot of people can't stand them because they have no proof for their statements.

However, I like reading them. It seems to me they generally "get it right". I'll admit, I haven't read them much.

But there's no doubt, for some people, skipping over their stuff is the way to go.


20 posted on 07/04/2005 8:28:27 PM PDT by strategofr (What did happen to those 293 boxes of secret FBI files (esp on Senators) Hillary stole?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson