Posted on 07/09/2005 1:22:00 PM PDT by wagglebee
I think this is the first and LAST step for the RATs and Schumer is going to wish he could crawl under the chair before this is through -- would love to see the look in the President's eyes when he looks right through Schumer -- that poker face he gets when he is displeased is not something I would want to be on the receiving end.
Bush should run down every conceivable name known to man, and let them vent. Anything they say will be information, and can be used against them, if and when convenient. Just keep asking questions, to get them to vent some more.
"Advise and Consent." Nothing wrong with this.
I've got one, and only one question:
At what point do we, as Americans and our elected officials, duly sworn to uphold and defend our Constitution and our Republic, admit to ourselves that the Democratic Party as it now exists, is not an actual political party, but a subversive, seditionist group which threatens the national security of our nation?
There may be some honorable Democrats (like Zell Miller) here and there, but for the most part they are disloyal to the core, have nothing but contempt for our heritage and history as a Constitutional Republic, and their sole goal is to take down the government, if not through the electoral process (where they have been firmly rebuffed), then through the illusory "impeachment" gambit, or the subtle and below the radar encouragement of our enemies.
At some point we either have to surrender to the treasonous bastards and let them finish the job of destroying America, or we have to smash the living dogsh*t out of them once and for all.
The "Democratic Party" is not democratic, and the only party they intend to throw is the celebration of the destruction of our United States, if they have their way.
I like that. Get the Rats' choices, then leave the Rats twisting in the wind.
~~ On Chuck Schumer ~~
He's not been a very good sport
His only technique is to thwart
He'd rather "advise"
And run everyone's lives
Chuck wants his own seat on the court
Schumer's comments translate into the following: "To prove the consultation was genuine he must nominate someone we approve of"
Don't give names...That just gives the libs longer to dirt dig and generate stories about the nominee.
He should say, "Don't worry, it will be a fair process, you Democrats will get 44 votes".
Funny, I don't find that terminology anywhere in the Constitution.
"Advice and Consent" doesn't mean ask them for permission on a nominee
Chuckie needs to brush up on his constitutionally meanings
I agree...I was thinking more along the lines of letting the Rats give the President a list of names.
Keep in mind that as far as Schumer and the rest of the left is concerned, the Constitution means whatever they want it to, what it says is irrelevant.
What would be interesting is, if he lures them into a room in the WH, then starts to ask them, hey boys and girls...when are you going to stop playing games with our WOT, are you with me or are you against me. And if you are with me, you had better stop shooting your foul mouths off, and giving aid and comfort to the world of Islamofacist.
I wonder if there is a way he could invite around 30 'Rat senators to the White House, keep them waiting in a room while he announces the nomination and then the remaining senators could go ahead and confirm before the 'Rats could make it back to the Capitol.
"There may be some honorable Democrats (like Zell Miller) here and there, but for the most part they are disloyal to the core, have nothing but contempt for our heritage and history as a Constitutional Republic, and their sole goal is to take down the government"
Note that the Confederates were Democrats. The treasonous tendencies within the Democratic Party are nothing new.
Under any circumstances.
Even giving the appearance of allowing lying bastards to appear to get their "demands" is enough for me want to chew nails!
Losers, in the real universe, never make the rules.
Were those 900 FBI files that Hilary had in her bedroom ever returned?
The strategery is always talked about, but we never seem to close the door on these socialists.
I still haven't heard the President come out in defiance of the Kelo ruling.
Look, I worked (very hard) for the President's reelection (including 48 straight hours before election day, a 3 hour nap, and all day as a poll watcher in a Florida district where demoSCUM hanky-panky was more than plausible.
I'm just sick and tired of carrying the water out here. I want the socialist scum removed from office, regardless of party. The President needs to be a stronger leader than he's being.
His detractors are going to say the same crap, no matter what he does. So, he needs to do what's right for this country, throw the "elite" opinion in the crapper, and start kicking leftist ass.
Unfortunately, I'm still waiting...
Everything is wrong with this.
Advice and consent is for the full senate, not the bottom dwellers.
This may not be a very thoughtful analogy but, people in hell want ice water.
I completely agree with you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.