Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush supporters outnumber Crawford critics
Star-Telegram ^ | 8-28-05 | Jack Douglas Jr.

Posted on 08/28/2005 8:04:18 AM PDT by veronica

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 last
To: veronica

"Pittman agreed, calling the pro-Bush crowds "very cordial, like regular people" while saying the anti-war demonstrators seemed "confused.""

Of course they're confused - they're democrats!


181 posted on 08/29/2005 4:21:51 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

I just sent this to one of our local talk show hosts here in Phoenix, Barry Young who supports the President but hasn't, in my hearing, noted the conservative turn out in Crawford.

Specifically, I called his attention to Cindy Watson's statement about not wanting Cindy using her son's cross.
Cindy is from Phoenix. Michael Williams, her son, was killed in Iraq.


182 posted on 08/29/2005 4:31:13 PM PDT by righttackle44 (The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

read-later-with-a-smile bump


183 posted on 08/29/2005 4:44:18 PM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

I can understand your frustration with the lifetime appointments. In certain fields I think it's probably the worst thing that would happen short of no lifetime appointments.

I do not think our nation would be well served by each new president dumping the old judicial crew and starting out fresh.

Imagine a guy like Clinton getting to appoing nine SCOTUS members at one time. Why he'd have been declared god after six years.


184 posted on 08/29/2005 7:00:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

Comment #185 Removed by Moderator

Comment #186 Removed by Moderator

To: bad_santa_man

"I hope you get help."


Anyone who thinks Hanoi Kerry isn't behind the anti war crowd needs to get a clue.

There is no need to impeach Hanoi Kerry from the US Senate

He is there illegally!

WAKEUP AMERICA!

For those who "forgot" what Hanoi Kerry
did in the past read on and learn the truth.

Hanoi Kerry was still a USNR officer while he:
gave false hearsay testimony to Congress
negotiated with the enemy
helped the US lose a war
abetted in the deaths of millions
created a hostile environment for all servicemen

Why is Kerry still in the US Senate?
This is in violation of
U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 Sec 3
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxiv.html

And the FBI has proof of his treason.

Hanoi Kerry Timeline of a traitor
includes FBI files

May 1970
Kerry and Julia traveled to Paris, France and met with Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, the Foreign Minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam (PRG), the political wing of the Vietcong, and other Viet Cong and Communist Vietnamese representatives to the Paris peace talks, a trip he now calls a "fact-finding" mission.

(U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953, declares it illegal for a U.S. citizen to go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power.)

http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html

a) A person charged with absence without leave or missing movement in time of war,
or with any offense punishable by death,
may be tried at any time without limitation.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj.htm#*%20843.%20ART.%2043.%20STATUTE%20OF%20LIMITATIONS

Distribute these url's!

Links to Anti Kerry sites
212 LINKS
News reports,
Viper's Vietnam Veterans Page

http://members.aol.com/ga1449ga/links/links.html


EXPOSE HANOI KERRY!

MUST SEE WEBSITE!!!!

http://www.kerrystreason.com/index.html

Full details on these url's!

http://tonkin.spymac.net

There is a backup site
if the 1st url is unavailable.

http://stophanoikerry.150m.com


Did you see this...?
(The 'Kerry's Promise Counter')
http://polipundit.com/index.php?p=6628
Polipundit even tells you how to install it on your own page!


187 posted on 08/29/2005 10:46:59 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"I do not think our nation would be well served by each new president dumping the old judicial crew and starting out fresh."

You're absolutely right! I wouldn't want the whole shebang dumped with each new president, but I do feel that, perhaps, a 10 year "tour of duty" might be enough to let us, the citizens, know whether they should remain or go. Further, I believe it should be us, the citizens, who determine their longevity.

Also, I'd like to know where, in the Constitution or otherwise, it says that politicians should get a pension after one term. That should be rescinded.
188 posted on 08/30/2005 9:04:47 AM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

I'm not opposed to judges having to face the public after a period of time. Heck, my vote helped remove Rose Bird and two other judges from the SCOCa.

My concern was a situation where one president or party could dominate the SCOTUS.

With the SCOTUS, I could go for a term of ten years with the provision that after they faced that first election, I'd suggest every five years after that.

I do want judges to be somewhat above public opinion. On the other hand, I don't want them thumbing their noses at us either.

When the SCOTUS recently allowed the taking of private property on nothing more than a whim, I realized it was time to end the 'for life' situation.

It's time that the judges got back to the U.S. Constitution when it comes to weapons also. I guess that could apply to a number of issues.

Yes, I'd also agree regarding the retirment plans.

When it comes to Congress and the Senate, I'm pretty rigid. Number one, their sessions are way too long. Number two, they shouldn't be paid to sit in those bodies. They should do so part time.

The best way for these jerks to remember who they're working for and what private life is like, is to force them to have to make ends meet just like the rest of us.

I'm not exactly sure how this would work, I haven't given it a lot of thought. I am quite uncomfortable with the idea that only wealthy people can serve in our federal government. There are times when I wish there were more average Joe's on duty in Washington, where they could do some good.

The fools back there now pass bills with no regard to what it will do to the middle class.

I wouldn't mind seeing the members of Congress tripled. I'm not convinced it wouldn't be an improvement to have three reps from each district. There would be a position for a person whose family made $50k or less, one of $50k - $100k and one for in excess of $100k.

This last idea is a very rough draft. I'd have to give this more though before I actually bought on to it.

The problem for me at this time, is that I get the feeling that those folks in D.C. haven't a clue what most of us have to deal with every day.

I do not want to see Congress dominated by wealthy people or poor people.

Thanks for the comments.


189 posted on 08/30/2005 4:14:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: bad_santa_man

Who ask you ..??


190 posted on 08/30/2005 10:30:26 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America has the greatest military on the face of the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: jodinabowers
OK, COMPLETELY spontaneous moment, with just enough time to get a makeup check... Did I get it right this time???

Yes you did! Sorry my response is so late. Hey, if you are sincere in being a Freeper and believe the same, welcome to FR!

I wasn't sure if you were a DUmmie, or not. Stick around, jodinabowers. You can't have a thin skin around here.

191 posted on 09/02/2005 4:55:05 PM PDT by JLO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: gidget7
The rally will not be forgotten however. Have no fear

I hope you are right that her treasonous behavior won't be be forgotten or forgiven. But I don't think so. Kerry still walks the Earth. Cindy Sheehan is anti-war history! Katrina trumped her, big time. She's down the memory hole. Way, way too many important stories besides what she says/thinks.) Never fear though, Jane Fonda is right there, too. UGH.

192 posted on 09/02/2005 6:20:33 PM PDT by JLO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson