Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC Sues Pro-Republican Political Group (Club for Growth)
ap on Yahoo ^ | 9/19/05 | Sharon Theimer - ap

Posted on 09/19/2005 4:24:08 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 09/19/2005 4:24:08 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
How is moveon.org and Soros handled?
2 posted on 09/19/2005 4:25:24 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

bump


3 posted on 09/19/2005 4:27:49 PM PDT by RippleFire ("It's a joke, son!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I wish the Club good luck in protecting their First Amendment rights to free speech.

I will continue to donate to them.


4 posted on 09/19/2005 4:28:41 PM PDT by RWR8189 ( Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

damn that free speech!


5 posted on 09/19/2005 4:29:59 PM PDT by flashbunny (Do you believe in the Constitution only until it keeps the government from doing what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, . . ."

What part of the foregoing authorizes Congress to empower the FEC to tell the Club of Growth what it can and cannot say?

6 posted on 09/19/2005 4:31:41 PM PDT by TheConservator (Confutatis maledictis, . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Yeah, I noticed they didn't have the guts to try it on MoveOn or ACT.
7 posted on 09/19/2005 4:33:59 PM PDT by .cnI redruM ( "Go ahead, punk, make my Earl Grey." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
8 posted on 09/19/2005 4:41:29 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Go ahead FEC give it a whirl! A Roberts Supreme Court will hand you your ASS!


9 posted on 09/19/2005 4:46:15 PM PDT by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I will continue to donate to them.
---

I wonder if the Republican party is caving into this because the CFG is challenging so many of their RINO 'hand picked' establishment candidates that love to porkbarrel and expand government. They almost unseated Spector and Coburn is causing all kinds of trouble for the bloated big spending Republicans in the Senate.

The CFG is the most outstanding political organization that exists in the United States.

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/why.php

I wouldn't give one cent to the Republican party.


10 posted on 09/19/2005 6:33:20 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/janicerogersbrown.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08; AuH2ORepublican

This is a very big story, with broad implications.


11 posted on 09/19/2005 6:34:35 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/janicerogersbrown.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I look forward SCOTUS scuttling the FEC rules and campaign finance laws.



12 posted on 09/19/2005 7:40:03 PM PDT by Valpal1 (Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Further proof that the FEC is just one more government agency whose mission is to keep Democrats in power nasd Big Government in place.


13 posted on 09/19/2005 11:29:15 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
What part of the foregoing authorizes Congress to empower the FEC to tell the Club of Growth what it can and cannot say?

Penumbra seventeen of the ninth emanation, which clearly overrides the archaic, eighteenth century relic you choose to cite.

14 posted on 09/19/2005 11:55:16 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"At stake is whether Club for Growth will be able to continue raising and spending millions of dollars in soft money for activities influencing federal elections," said Toner, a Republican.

It's called FREE SPEECH, YOU IDIOT!

15 posted on 09/19/2005 11:59:26 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is an outrageous attack on the First Amendment. CFG is an excellent organization.


16 posted on 09/20/2005 12:31:34 AM PDT by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Mkay, so how about the Rainbow Coalition, NOW, all of the Gay/Lesbian Alliances etc. Maybe the big government Pubbies figure they can take our real conservatives/Libertarians and open the floodgates of lawsuits against democrat groups at the same time.

I'm also curious where Dubya is on all of this.
17 posted on 09/20/2005 6:10:11 AM PDT by BJClinton (Yaaargh! Happy Day After Talk Like a Pirate Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
I wonder if the Republican party is caving into this because the CFG is challenging so many of their RINO 'hand picked' establishment candidates that love to porkbarrel and expand government.

I hate to sound tin-foilish, but that's the first thing that crossed my mind too. I've completely stopped donating to the GOP in leiu of the CFG and encourage all freepers to do the same.

18 posted on 09/20/2005 9:40:06 AM PDT by jmc813 ("Small-government conservative" is a redundancy, and "compassionate conservative" is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton
President Bush's re-election campaign and the sponsors of the 2002 campaign finance law sued the FEC last year, accusing it of failing to enforce the law and crack down on soft money spending, particularly in the presidential race. Those cases are pending in federal court.

Sounds like he's taking a firm 1A stance against unConstitutional finance "reform" (after all he only signed it cause he thought scotus would invalidate it). From the article:

President Bush's re-election campaign and the sponsors of the 2002 campaign finance law sued the FEC last year, accusing it of failing to enforce the law and crack down on soft money spending, particularly in the presidential race. Those cases are pending in federal court.

19 posted on 09/20/2005 10:41:48 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Wups. Forgot the < /sarcasm > tag. Some Freepers don't get it unless you include one.


20 posted on 09/20/2005 10:42:52 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson