Posted on 09/26/2005 6:16:11 AM PDT by SpringheelJack
Just how many times are you going to post that without mentioning the sub-300 foot corners Ruth benefited from?
I don't know of anybody the press "outed". Their "investigative" skills seem to be limited to attending a MLB press conference after somebody fails a drug test.
I was posting that information to show that there's no evidence that Ruth took an undue advantage from his park, and Mays a detriment.
Actually, Bonds's adjusted OPS's have beaten the best Ruth ever put up. The only reason Ruth beat the number 2 guy by a 35-hr margin is because he was playing the modern game while everyone else was still stuck in a dead ball mentality. Ruth could not have put up such leads at any other time in history.
There hasn't been any real journalists since MURROW. The rest are all reporters..........and SPORTS reporters are the lowest of the bunch...........
There's a reason they called his Home Runs "Ruthian", he routinely hit it out of the park, in stadiums that required 500+ foot HRs. Ruth was HR champ at age 25 and hit more home runs than many opposing teams.
You don't think a 295 foot right field fence was an advantage for Ruth? If he had 335 foot fences, 10 or 12 feet high, he would have hit far fewer home runs in Yankee Stadium during that era.
Ruth never saw a pitch his entire career. Gehrig was the luckiest guy on the planet batting behind Ruth. They were forced to pitch to him, and he made them pay dearly. Gehrig's stats vs. his peers are far better than Bonds vs. peers. Griffey's first 10 years were far better than Bonds.
I'm talking about the whole park. It had eccentric dimensions, but overall when it came to home runs it balanced itself out --- for left-handed hitters, anyway.
They used to say the same thing about the baseballs that Ruth hit.
I agree, why try to hide it. Steroids are a part of every major sport...it can't be stopped.
I enjoyed the WWF & all atheletes were juiced. Football players have been juiced for 30 years & I still enjoy the NFL. Heck steroids are even into golf.
Let the athelete assume the risks.
Actually, Aaron hold that record.
I'm not sure I know exactly what that means, except that Ruth was playing on a different level than everyone else. And that's why I think that Bonds may exceed the Babe's numbers, but his impact on the game will never come close.
Babe Ruth carried the game out of scandal and low reputation and made it the national pasttime. While I wouldn't blame Bonds for all the steroid woes (there's plenty of blame to go around), his positve impact on the game in insignificant.
I bet those balls didn't float like the ones today. I remember the first time I saw Barry Bonds hit one into McCovey Cove, and the boaters scrambled for the ball. When I played,
we lost many a ball in the pond just over the fence.
It means that Ruth was swinging for the fences, while everyone else was still choking up.
He was still on a different level, though not a level that Bonds hasn't matched in the last four years.
I bet Bonds has the record for the most home runs using steroids.
Actually, I'd bet on either Sosa or Palmeiro. Bonds reportedly only began using in 1999.
What matters is how you compare to your peers. In 20 years, Bonds' lead his league in OPS just 8 times. Bonds leads in HR 2 yrs. out of 20. Ruth lead the league in OPS 13 out of his 17 years, 12 out of 17 in HRs. Slg Pct. Bonds 8 yrs. out of 20, Ruth 13 out of 17. Every major stat versus their peers Ruth blew away Bonds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.