Posted on 10/08/2005 12:41:45 PM PDT by Lindykim
I just learned about St. Maria Goretti last night. Her story is worth checking out.
Maybe that's the problem. And maybe the solution is not making Americans who can afford to have children not do it in order to make room for the illegals. And that's all I have to say about that.
But that is not the issue. Several posters on this thread have made continual claims that Paul C. Jesup ia pro-gay and pro-transgender (among other claims).
I'm trying to discern the basis of these claims and, while I certainly don't expect anyone to "go through" 8,700 threads (or posts), I have gone through many threads seeking some basis for the charges being thrown around.
I have not found anything resembling what I would have expected considering the vituperation directed at the poster. Perhaps some of you could provide me some links where such bias or propensity shows up clearly. I have yet to find it despite a lot of searching and am curious as to how something like this gets started.
""... unequivocally supported the "gay" agenda in all its glory over and over again ...
Three or four such links would help greatly. Thanks in advance.
I've run the homosexual agenda ping list for almost two years, with some assistance here and there; now DirtyHarryY2K and I both run it. Last I checked I had over 13,000 comments made (and actually another year's worth on top of that). My time is very valuable, and I absolutely don't have the hours I would need (with very slow dialup factored in) to search for the evidence you want. This is not a copout, it's the bare truth. I already have dozens of projects that I am neglecting.
Sorry.
The assumption is that you support the 'tolerance' indoctrination of young children -being taught against the wishes of parents that homosexuality is normal and that sexuality should be explored at any age and or in any situation etcetera...
What is your position on this?
If on the other hand you are asserting that children being indoctrinated is wrong and that overcoming ignorance entails teaching children that homosexuality is disordered and the activity abnormal and dangerous then I would guess most would agree...
So what is the 'ignorance' you oppose - (1) PC tolerance of lies OR (2) the real truth based in moral absolute?
If your statement in post #78 was but metaphor mirroring your opposition to indoctrination then expound upon this -if you really assert the statement literally I and others no doubt would consider you over the edge...
What exactly do you mean with the statement "Personally, I don't give a damn about the children. To many people have been murdered 'for the children'"?
What is your position on this?
I think everything socialist, from sex-ed, to political correctness, to zero tolerence should be thrown out of schools and into the dustbin of history.
If on the other hand you are asserting that children being indoctrinated is wrong and that overcoming ignorance entails teaching children that homosexuality is disordered and the activity abnormal and dangerous then I would guess most would agree...
There is homosexuality and there is pedophilia, they are two different things.
I have no real opinion for or against adult-on-adult homosexuality. I am against adult-on-child pedophilia and I do believe parents should warned their children about it to protect them from such rapists.
So what is the 'ignorance' you oppose - (1) PC tolerance of lies OR (2) the real truth based in moral absolute?
I am against both (1) and (2) in the context that the belief of an 'moral absolute' is the dangerious, keep in mind that 'zero tolerence' uses the 'moral abosolute' mind set and we have seen how bad that has turned out.
If your statement in post #78 was but metaphor mirroring your opposition to indoctrination then expound upon this
What exactly do you mean with the statement "Personally, I don't give a damn about the children. To many people have been murdered 'for the children'"?
Alright I should have been a little more detailed in that post, I was talking from the mind set that liberals use the excuse of 'for the children' as an excuse to hurt people, and to will expound further, corrupt children.
You are both too busy or unwilling to provide me links that back up what you say yet you are more than willing to continuing attacking the poster Paul C. Jesup?
Is that a fair statement after I have told you I have searched many threads to find such information but have not found it?
What you want to think is up to you. I am telling you the truth that I do not have the time to search through two to three years of threads and comments.
Have a nice day.
What I think is driven by facts, my man.
You have provided none except to say you're "too busy". I didn't ask you to go through two or three years worth of threads either, but merely to provide a few links that you consider to be the more egregious and show the basis for your attack on this poster,
If you can't provide the facts, that speaks for itself. I would think ohers would notice that also. Do you expect everyone to merely take your word for it? Facts, please!
I'm compiling a list of links! Be back in a few.
I liked your quote - see my tagline
OK ... TYVM.
Transgender engineer proud of YWCA honor
Transgender Law Making Strides
TRANSSEXUAL FOSTER CARE BILL PASSES COMMITTEE HURDLE (California Puke Alert)
I'm very sure there's plenty more to choose from, I've wasted enough time and I'm not going to dig through every thread on the FR.
Though you may disagree with the subject matter, you will find my statements for the most part on those threads to be from a logical standpoint.
Right on...the words belong to the people to heed.
Second, I can appreciate the fact that you'd like to know "the facts" before you pass judgment on a person as I have the same mindset.
You may not yet see the whole situation (in context) as things actually are because you haven't followed all the threads on the subject. There are several of us here that oppose the radacal homosexual lobby and the brand of homosexual activism that is rampant in our society today.
There are 8,700 + articles + replies in reference to homosexuality posted on the FR, most of which have been pinged out to the group of pinglisters that oppose the homosexual agenda and those that advocate homosexuality.
From what I've whitnessed first hand, Paul C. Jesup jumps in on a number of those threads with both feet and - (for whatever reason) -
This thread is the only thread I've seen where he has back-peddaled and tried to explain one of his more questionable comments.
I can't speak for everyone else, but that (and his outrageous comment on post #78 on this thread) is the reason I think he deserves a little contempt. And I think others would agree as well.
A wise man once said - If a person finds himself getting too much negative feedback from his fellow citizens, then perhaps he should ask himself the simple question: why?
You are not on the ping list because you haven't requested to be on the ping list.
FReegards.
Ban him! Ban him!
As a native Houstonian I can tell you that the Montrose area is a legendary Houston area homosexual community where all the "Gay Bars" are located.
Things that make you go..Hmmmmmmm.
I most certainly did say where I lived. You want to make something of it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.