Posted on 10/22/2005 12:55:43 PM PDT by 68skylark
Getting out isn't an option for if we were to get out we would lose ALL voice in the UN.
As a standing member of the founders of the UN our only option to be rid of the corruption and mayhem in the UN is to better our inside forces. This has been done with the appointment of John Bolton.
Leaving the UN to their corruption without influence would only increase the cause for concern for us as a nation.
Like a worldly organization that is driven by the ideal of destroying our way of life.
If you think that they are doing it now, just imagine an organization without us holding our seat within that holds veto power.
Nonsense. If the U.S. pulled out of the U.N., the U.N. would collapse within a year due to loss of our ridiculously ample "dues" to their terrorist love-fest.
The sooner we exit the U.N. and relocate them to Gaza (so they can snuggle up with the very terrorists they adore so much) the better off we'll all be.
Shirking fights?? The President is still fighting the world because he didn't have UN approval to go into Iraq. Now the UN is in Iraq making DNC talking points about voter fraud.
As much as I would like to see President Bush withdraw us from the stinking UN and kick them out of the USA, it must be done in the same way one eats an elephant ... one bite at a time.
There has been an investigation going on of the Oil for Food scandal for well over a year, with more fingers pointing at the UN everyday. He went around the demonRATS and the crybaby, and recess appointed Bolton. Congress voted to cut our "contribution" to the UN by half. (did that stick?)
Like everything else, it takes time. President Bush can't "nuke" the UN, anymore than he can "nuke" SS or DOE or appoint any judge he wants.
Bravo Sierra.
Like everything else, it takes time. President Bush can't "nuke" the UN, anymore than he can "nuke" SS or DOE or appoint any judge he wants.
Sensibility and long term vision has just become your claim to fame justanobody.
To me anyway!
If you keep flattering me like that people will begin to talk. *fluttering eyelashes* ;*)
Well, there's a brilliant and thought-out rebuttal.
(/SARCASM)
It's long past time we put the UN on the list of terrorist groups.
Axis of evil bump
Consider the discoveries that have been made since the invasion of Iraq. Consider how those discoveries have reflected on Kofi Annan and the United Nations.
Despite the MSM's blackout, the words "Oil for Food" are now synonymous with the words "United Nations corruption".
This administration has done more to damage the UN's image than any other. And the President has done it without ever appearing to "attack" the institution.
This simply can't be.
If you think that they are doing it now, just imagine an organization without us holding our seat within that holds veto power.
OH MY GOD! If the UN can do this, I shudder to think what the League of Nations is cooking up right now!
When the most powerful, resourceful and generous nation on earth doesn't recognize you, you cease to exist!
Well "everybody else did it too" isn't really a great defense. I think we should ask for high standards in the current administration (and the next one too, for that matter). Let's do better in the future than we have in the past.
I'm starting to think the UN is beyond reform and beyond help. It's time to start thinking about more radical solutions.
Maybe I've been too harsh. Maybe the Bush administration is doing a good job of cleaning up the mess and making sure U.S. taxpayers are getting good value for the money we send to the UN.
Maybe we're on the right track, and we just need to keep doing what we're doing to have a nice, clean, helpful UN in the future.
I doubt it, personally. I think we're on the wrong track, and the Bush administration is doing little more than rearranging a few deck chairs.
"ethically-challenged"
LOL
I never said I was happy about it. I simply pointed to steps that have been taken. The Oil for Food scandal may very well be their own downfall. Then of course there is Dar fur and a myriad of other areas I could sight.
Personally, I don't think they can be "reformed" and would rather see them cease to exist. In the meantime, we have Bolton on the inside, hopefully gathering more ammunition. Have you given any consideration to the maniacal opposition to the Bolton appointment? To me, it was a big red flag that something more than a dislike of his personality is involved. I could be wrong, but...
There are many outside factors involved, the WOT not the least of them. Prosecuting the WOT takes precedence over the UN, IMNSHO.
The day is coming....
I have to admit that EGPWS has a point here.
The 'enemy' has more than enough money to build the new UN building, and call it a world court.
As much as I detest the UN, we're probably better in it.
*dreaming*
Wouldn't it be nice if we could take it over, and clean it out?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.