Skip to comments.
An explosion on the Moon
NASA ^
| 12.23.2005
Posted on 12/24/2005 8:11:55 AM PST by jmcenanly
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: Some hope remaining.
You do know what this means? If "they" can "see" a 12cm object strike the Moon, how come "they" never release
photos of the Apollo landing sites taken from Earth or the Hubble?
I was just reading some USENET posts on the possible location of the Beagle 2 "landing" site. (On Mars...)
To: jmcenanly
Sheila Jackson Lee wants to know if it hit near the Mars Rovers.
62
posted on
12/24/2005 9:38:38 AM PST
by
BnBlFlag
(Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis)
To: jmcenanly
Even NASA can't get it right. It was an "impact", not an "explosion."
Words have meaning. Or at least they should, especially to scientists.
63
posted on
12/24/2005 9:46:35 AM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: MediaMole
There rules here you know . . .
64
posted on
12/24/2005 9:53:05 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: picturebell
Somebody playing paintball with a really hot gun...
To: BenLurkin
66
posted on
12/24/2005 9:54:50 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: Calvin Locke
If "they" can "see" a 12cm object strike the Moon, how come "they" never release photos of the Apollo landing sites taken from Earth or the Hubble? Dude, what they saw wasn't the 12cm object striking the moon. What they saw was the 70 kiloton explosion that resulted from the 12cm object striking the moon. A 70 kiloton explosion is just a little bit larger than the bottom half of a moon lander, and gives off just a little bit more light.
The landers are way too small to be seen by any telescope on Earth, or by the Hubble for that matter.
67
posted on
12/24/2005 9:55:22 AM PST
by
wyattearp
(The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
To: jmcenanly
. . . . women and minorities hardest hit
68
posted on
12/24/2005 9:55:27 AM PST
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: Beelzebubba; jwpjr; jmcenanly
It was an "impact", not an "explosion." Words have meaning. Or at least they should, especially to scientists.There's nothing wrong with using "explosion" here. Just because it was a big bang caused by kinetic energy of an impact instead of chemical 'bomb' energy doesn't make it less of an explosion.
Words -do- have meaning, or at least they should....to FReepers!
69
posted on
12/24/2005 9:56:52 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: jmcenanly
70
posted on
12/24/2005 9:57:07 AM PST
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: ChadGore
71
posted on
12/24/2005 9:58:38 AM PST
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: EagleUSA
[chuckle]
All too typical of a reaction nowadays.
72
posted on
12/24/2005 10:00:16 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: sam_paine
There's nothing wrong with using "explosion" here. Just because it was a big bang caused by kinetic energy of an impact instead of chemical 'bomb' energy doesn't make it less of an explosion.
By the same token, when I kick the toe of my boot into the dirt, and raise a cloud of fragments, that is an explosion?
No, I begin with the lay dictionary definition:
1. A release of mechanical, chemical, or nuclear energy in a sudden and often violent manner with the generation of high temperature and usually with the release of gases.
2. A violent bursting as a result of internal pressure.
3. The loud, sharp sound made as a result of either of these actions.
A rock hitting dirt does not fall under any of these definitions. Of course, scientists and engineers have a narrower definition of the term. Even the energy released when the gunpowder is detonated in a rifle or cannon is not an explosion, it is rapid combustion.
NASA is just playing "bread and circuses" exaggeration games to get headlines and our earnings.
73
posted on
12/24/2005 10:09:09 AM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: wyattearp
What they saw was the 70 kiloton explosion that resulted from the 12cm object striking the moon.
Actually, what they saw was the cloud of ejecta debris and dust that was kicked up from the impact.
When this happens near the terminator (the sunset/sunrise line that divides the dark from the light) in a dark area, and the debris rises up into the sunlit area, it can be very visible, even to the naked eye.
74
posted on
12/24/2005 10:11:59 AM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: sayfer bullets
That was a cool series, actually. After the bloodless, passionless first season.
Dan
75
posted on
12/24/2005 10:12:59 AM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: jmcenanly
The Lunartic Fringe. What a Rush! Bush's fault line!
To: OkiMusashi
Official notification that you have posted the best reply to one of these threads in the history of FreeRepublic.
77
posted on
12/24/2005 10:22:15 AM PST
by
ImpBill
("America ... Where are you now?")
To: wyattearp
I can imagine how they estimated the amount of energy the explosion had from the image, but how do you suppose they could determine the velocity?
To: jwpjr
Isn't the headline a bit misleading? My reaction as well. I was expecting volcanism, hydrothermal activity, maybe some weird chemical reaction. Instead it was a routine meteorite impact with the sensational difference that someone on Earth observed it. That's where the head's emphasis should have been.
79
posted on
12/24/2005 10:22:24 AM PST
by
Bernard Marx
(Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
To: Beelzebubba
1. A release of mechanical, chemical, or nuclear energy in a sudden and often violent manner with the generation of high temperature and usually with the release of gases. I would say this definition covers a meteor impact. A meteor has mechanical energy that is converted to high temperature that violently vaporizes the soil and releases gases.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson