Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I TOOK NO $ FROM ABRAMOFF (Rangel's Wampum Linked to Scandal re hyphenated Americans)
NY POST ^ | January 1, 2006 | LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Posted on 01/01/2006 7:24:28 AM PST by Liz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Liz
Rangel is getting out in front of a scandal that could expose Congress to a lot of insider wheeling and dealing.

Since the time of propaganda war between Jefferson and Hamilton isn't that what Congress is really about?

41 posted on 01/01/2006 9:59:12 AM PST by fella ("(News) should be the maximum of information & minimum of comment." - Cobden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Liz

The whole "Native American" gambling industry has become a source of political corruption arising out of liberal- guilt from the sins of the pale-faces and out of pure greed.


42 posted on 01/01/2006 10:30:35 AM PST by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Has Rangel ever denied being a communist? Don't think so.

Had he been captured in Korea, I think he would have stayed.

43 posted on 01/01/2006 10:52:32 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
"Has Rangel ever denied being a communist? Don't think so."

Hell, he hasn't yet admitted to being a damned idiot.

Semper Fi

44 posted on 01/01/2006 11:09:22 AM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Liz

The MSM is up to it's old tricks again, claiming Abramoff is a GOP lobbyist.

FYI:

Nearly three dozen members of Congress, including leaders from both parties, pressed the government to block a Louisiana Indian tribe from opening a casino while the lawmakers collected large donations from rival tribes and their lobbyist, Jack Abramoff.

Many intervened with letters to Interior Secretary Gale Norton within days of receiving money from tribes represented by Abramoff or using the lobbyist's restaurant for fundraising, an Associated Press review of campaign records, IRS records and congressional correspondence found.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert, an Illinois Republican, held a fundraiser at Abramoff's Signatures restaurant in Washington on June 3, 2003, that collected at least $21,500 for his Keep Our Majority political action committee from the lobbyist's firm and tribal clients.

Seven days later, Hastert wrote Norton urging her to reject the Jena tribe of Choctaw Indians' request for a new casino. ...

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid sent a letter to Norton on March 5, 2002 ... The next day, the Coushattas issued a $5,000 check to Reid's tax-exempt political group, the Searchlight Leadership Fund. A second Abramoff tribe sent another $5,000 to Reid's group. Reid ultimately received more than $66,000 in Abramoff-related donations between 2001 and 2004. ...

Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., the former Senate GOP leader, wrote Norton on March 1, 2002, to "seriously urge" she reject the Jena casino. Lott received $10,000 in donations from Abramoff tribes just before the letter and $55,000 soon after. Lott's office said he sent the letter because his state's Choctaw tribe and a casino company were concerned about losing business.

Then-Sen. John Breaux (news, bio, voting record), D-La., wrote Norton on March 1, 2002. Five days later the Coushattas sent $1,000 to his campaign and $10,000 to his library fund, tribal records show.

Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., wrote Norton on June 14, 2001, one of the first such letters. Cochran's political committee got $6,000 from Abramoff tribes in the weeks before the letter, and another $71,000 in the three years after.

Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., who was engaged in a tight re-election race in 2002, sent her letter March 6, 2002. That same day, the Coushattas sent $2,000 to her campaign and she received $5,000 more by the end of that month. By year's end, the total had grown to at least $24,000.

The money involved totals to over $800,000, far more than the cash output involved in the Keating 5 savings-and-loan scandal in the 80s. Unlike the Keating scandal, where John McCain was the only Republican involved in the cash-for-influence scandal, Abramoff made sure that he worked both parties in depth to maximize his ability to influence the bureaucracy at Interior.

There's more:

Senator Dorgan (Dem-ND) held a fundraiser in Abramoff's skybox. One of the ND tribes paid for the use of the box for Dorgan's fundraiser. (AP)

Dorgan collected $11,500 plus in political donations from the Abramoff's partner who was representing the Mass. Mashpee tribe after he pushed for federal recognition of them .(AP)

Rangel has taken $27,000 from the Mississippi Choctaws and another $9,000 from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians in California since 1999. Both tribes are eager to cash in on casino gambling and are clients of the indicted Abramoff. The tribes funneled $27,000 to Rangel's leadership PAC - used to help elect other Democrats - and routed another $9,000 directly to the Harlem Democrat's re-election campaign. A study by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics found that 210 members of Congress have received campaign cash from Abramoff, his associates or his Indian-tribe clients. (NY Post)


45 posted on 01/03/2006 1:16:01 PM PST by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

The MSM only gets aroused when the GOP is involved.

Maybe we oughta give 'em Viagra pills that work only in the presence of Dumbicrats.


46 posted on 01/03/2006 4:01:19 PM PST by Liz (You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Rangel - "I have never had sex with that man, Jack Abramoff."


47 posted on 01/03/2006 4:26:54 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Charlie didn't take any money. It was given to him.


48 posted on 01/03/2006 4:28:39 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (Don't have an annus horribilis in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

.......now that we got that clearly clarified......lOL.......


49 posted on 01/03/2006 4:31:07 PM PST by Liz (You may not be interested in politics; doesn't mean politics isn't interested in you. Pericles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson