Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Misspoke.
www.rushlimbaugh.com ^ | 1/7/2006

Posted on 01/07/2006 8:38:11 PM PST by lainie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-289 next last
Comment #221 Removed by Moderator

To: cahome

If you're trying to say that since I don't waste my time detailing criticism against leftists, I'm a hypocrite for noticing and saying so when I find a mistake from the right, then, I don't know what to say to you.

I didn't "prove my point" by quoting leftist sites. I proved my point by transcribing Rush's own words. And in the course of a Google search for 'Rush and Waco' (trying to prove or disprove the guy in #29), I found more of the same which I'd transcribed.

I thought it WAS worthy, and so did others. I've also made a few new friends here, which is a plus.


222 posted on 01/08/2006 10:28:55 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: cahome

And he's called Poppy, whether mocking or not, because it's easier to type than GWHB or GWHB-1 Bush-1 or Bush The First or all the other contortions.


223 posted on 01/08/2006 10:30:25 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: singfreedom

That's ridiculous. I couldn't care less if you agree with me or not. It's just that your positions don't sing freedom to me in every case.


224 posted on 01/08/2006 10:32:47 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
I'm glad you didn't ask something like, Should it be called the Civil War or The War Between the States?

It was the War of Northern Aggression.

;-)

225 posted on 01/08/2006 10:34:15 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

bump!


226 posted on 01/08/2006 10:38:05 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: lainie

The fallacy is not in the facts of which admin was in on which date, but in which party caused these events. The party that caused these events is neither R nor D but something else. The more important thing is which party recoiled from these events and which accepted them. We find that Ds don't see the problem and Rs see a big problem. The highwater mark of the party that caused these events came in 1994.


227 posted on 01/08/2006 10:38:29 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Right. That's where I got the piece which is transcribed here.


228 posted on 01/08/2006 10:38:58 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The party that caused these events is neither R nor D but something else.

Or there's less difference between R and D than most people think. Or, more to the point, the REAL culprit is the big, ugly, hungry beastly & behemoth FED, no matter whether R or D is in charge. The right hand hardly ever knows what the left hand is doing, and when it does, it thinks it's therefore infallible.

229 posted on 01/08/2006 10:43:33 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: lainie

Somebody is using the instutitions for their own purposes. It's pretty safe to say that, isn't it? An eternal truth? But, who are they, and are they organized or do they just know each other by instinct?


230 posted on 01/08/2006 10:50:57 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I think that's safe to say, yes. I don't know the answer to the other part. The identity of mythical "they" remains a mystery.


231 posted on 01/08/2006 10:56:39 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: lainie
Or there's less difference between R and D than most people think. Or, more to the point, the REAL culprit is the big, ugly, hungry beastly & behemoth FED, no matter whether R or D is in charge.

Clearly, Federal Government departments such as the FBI are large and take on a life of their own.

That's why it becomes important to try and differentiate the behavior of various administrations and how they deal with these corrupt, big departments.

Clearly, the Clinton administration supported the jackbooted behavior of the FBI at Ruby Ridge.

They promoted the FBI guy in charge, they prosecuted Weaver and Harris and they tried to cover it all up when Kohe destroyed key after-incident report documents.

There is no evidence that the Bush administration ordered the FBI to act illegally by commanding them to shot on site. His fault was that he simply couldn't rein in the FBI. But if you remember back to August of 1992, you'd recall that Bush was trailing in the polls to Clinton and he seemed very apathetic.

232 posted on 01/08/2006 10:57:45 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: lainie

I don't think it is Chartists. Reformers of some kind, though.


233 posted on 01/08/2006 10:58:10 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: lainie

The OKC bombing was missing in Rush's train-of-thought. I believe OKC was training material for today's terrorists. It was weakness testing. Realize it.


234 posted on 01/08/2006 11:02:49 AM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #235 Removed by Moderator

To: lainie

Not only am I not surprised that he was there sniping, I'm not surprised he lied about it. It would interesting to find out where the various government identity protection programs have hidden him and under what name.


236 posted on 01/08/2006 11:34:29 AM PST by DoNotDivide (Were the American Revolutionaries rebelling against Constituted Authority and thereby God? I say no.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: cahome

Well, way to focus on the use of one word and ignore the rest. If I used the word and it bothers you, just call me on it and say so. It is, however, used very commonly around here, to delineate the two Bushes. That's simply a fact. My advice is, don't assign a bunch of useless meaning to it. I'm sure he's a nice enough man, but he wasn't the greatest president. He obviously did a lot wrong and I'm offended by his administration murdering the Weaver family members. So, I called him Poppy, big deal.


237 posted on 01/08/2006 11:35:43 AM PST by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris

Thank you. He's a cold blooded murderer AFAIC.


238 posted on 01/08/2006 11:37:07 AM PST by DoNotDivide (Were the American Revolutionaries rebelling against Constituted Authority and thereby God? I say no.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: lainie
It is, however, used very commonly around here.

Poppy? No it's not.

239 posted on 01/08/2006 11:40:31 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: lainie
" I'm offended by his administration murdering the Weaver family members. So, I called him Poppy, big deal."

That situation was abnormal. Agree? I am heartened that the Justice Dept. has been tracking down 'environmental' terrorists for the last 4 years. Those wimpy douche bags won't last a week in a jail.

240 posted on 01/08/2006 11:51:21 AM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-289 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson