Skip to comments.
The Worst-Case Scenario
CBS News, 60 Minutes ^
| 01.29.06
Posted on 02/11/2006 2:35:31 PM PST by Coleus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
1
posted on
02/11/2006 2:35:33 PM PST
by
Coleus
To: Calpernia; SandRat
2
posted on
02/11/2006 2:35:45 PM PST
by
Coleus
(IMHO, The IVF procedure is immoral & kills many embryos/children and should be outlawed)
To: Coleus
Would "best case scenario" place CBS at ground zero?
3
posted on
02/11/2006 2:37:17 PM PST
by
joonbug
To: Coleus
Mecca assured destruction. MAD.
4
posted on
02/11/2006 2:40:59 PM PST
by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: joonbug
Would "best case scenario" place CBS at ground zero?Only if it included ABC, NBC, CNN, and NPR.
5
posted on
02/11/2006 2:41:31 PM PST
by
Rocko
(Liberals -- they have a compassion you always hear about, but never witness.)
To: Coleus
This is raw stock tooting by Sixty Minutes. 100,000 acute cases of rad posioning is a lot more than small nuclear device would deliver even if set off in Union City NJ -- imo.
6
posted on
02/11/2006 2:41:44 PM PST
by
bvw
To: joonbug
Would "best case scenario" place CBS at ground zero?Unlikely. The CBS building is also known as Black Rock, and of course the muslims worship a black rock. The two have much in common.
7
posted on
02/11/2006 2:41:52 PM PST
by
gotribe
(Hillary: Accessory to Rape)
To: Coleus
SHUUUUUUUSH!! CBS....your scaring Hilderbeast
8
posted on
02/11/2006 2:42:20 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
To: Coleus; Chieftain
Am I sure I want to be 'saved" and be around for what follows in this country after an attack? What a F...g nitemare. And our congress is just a ship of Fools. I am so depressed I am going out to get ice cream.
9
posted on
02/11/2006 2:42:56 PM PST
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(I am soooo sick of Oprah!!!! Oprah, STFU !)
To: Coleus
Democrats and a few Republicans are hell-bent on welcoming this kind of calamity!
It's not fair listening to the terrorists' cell phone calls.
Why doesn't Congress just make a law requiring every other American to be beheaded by Christmas!?
10
posted on
02/11/2006 2:44:26 PM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(expell the fat arrogant carcasses of Congress)
To: Coleus
11
posted on
02/11/2006 2:44:52 PM PST
by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: Coleus
>Thats because the Pentagon after decades of searching believes it has found a drug to treat radiation exposure. Why isnt that drug available?
So, the Pentagon
knocks on your door, and they want
to give you a shot.
How many Freepers
are gonna roll up their sleeves
and get injected?!
To: Coleus
Would he fire Simonson if it was his decision to make? "I would transfer him out of this. I wouldnt have him handling this program," Typical Government response.... Never fire the worthless SOB, just promote him "out of the department"....
13
posted on
02/11/2006 2:45:50 PM PST
by
dirtbiker
(I've tried to see the liberal point of view, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$....)
To: Coleus
Even the worst case scenario isn't all that bad...
1) Muslims nuke a major city (most are predominantly democratic bastions)
2) The attack results in fewer DUmmies to steal elections/cause crime/murder the unborn/vote for socialists/live off the government teat.
3) We "honor their memory" by nuking Mecca.
I can live with that.
14
posted on
02/11/2006 2:47:23 PM PST
by
Triggerhippie
(Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
To: Coleus
I suggest they hit San Francisco, Vermont, or Massataxus.
To: Coleus
Yeah, but for Howard Dean and the rest of the DefeatoCrats, the "Worst Case Scenario" is really the "Best Case Scenario" because a nuclear terrorist attack opens up the door to all sorts of political opportunities in which the 'Rats can blame the Republican Party for a "miserable failure" (thank YOU Dick Gephardt) in allowing such an attack to take place, you can bet your last dime that while Red Cross teams are trying to save lives, the 'Rat Party will be trying to assess their chances for seizing power at the earliest opportunity.
Cynical? Not at all. This is based on the proven behavior of the Wellstoners and King "mourners" who have demonstrated what their priorities are.
16
posted on
02/11/2006 2:50:51 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Why doesn't Congress just make a law requiring every other American to be beheaded by Christmas!?Sorry. That law would honor the "Winter Holiday."
17
posted on
02/11/2006 2:51:00 PM PST
by
Rocko
(Liberals -- they have a compassion you always hear about, but never witness.)
To: Coleus
18
posted on
02/11/2006 2:53:16 PM PST
by
sono
(Ted Kennedy's naming his dog Splash is like Jack Abramoff naming his dog Bribe.)
To: Coleus
"We can no longer ignore the worst-case scenario of a nuclear terrorist attack on an American city."
Hmmmmm... I don't think the rest of us have been doing that. Only the media and the Congress.
To: Coleus
BUTT CBS, NYT, TWP, ABC, NBC, CNN, LAT, ACLU, Bob Barr and the left wing say we should not monitor the terrorist without a warrant. So we can do nothing if the judge says NO and the enemy is laughing at the idiots who say we cannot monitor them.
DUMB, DUMB, DUMB
20
posted on
02/11/2006 2:57:44 PM PST
by
YOUGOTIT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson