Skip to comments.
THE PICTURES YOU WON'T SEE
michellemalkin.com ^
| May 02, 2006
| Michelle Malkin
Posted on 05/02/2006 6:37:27 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: the anti-liberal
THE PICTURES YOU WONT SEE
Lol. Your right. They are all red x's to me.
61
posted on
05/02/2006 8:27:37 AM PDT
by
CougarGA7
(There are no trophies for winning wars. Only consequences for losing them.)
To: sure_fine
"you're right, I don't see them"
There seems to be a traffic problem.
As suggested by Ghengis, try opening up the Michelle Malkin link and hit the back button back to this page.
See if that works for ya, if not, try 'right-click/view image'.
62
posted on
05/02/2006 8:27:40 AM PDT
by
the anti-liberal
(Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
To: the anti-liberal
You'd think such idiocy would be painful
Ignorance is bliss...
63
posted on
05/02/2006 8:27:56 AM PDT
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: the anti-liberal
God bless Michelle.
looks like someone's bandwidth runneth over...i know that feeling
64
posted on
05/02/2006 8:28:55 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
(MALDEF and LULAC have infested this forum....as if RINOS weren't bad enough)
To: All
Oh, sheesh, you complainers, can you see this picture now?!
65
posted on
05/02/2006 8:29:17 AM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: the anti-liberal
I just knew for this story FNC was going to use the pool feed.
right now FNC is usine the same air shot from california which shows NOTHING.
We need to see the real socialists' pictures.
You have to rely on FR to get the truth.
FNC should be embarassed.
66
posted on
05/02/2006 8:30:29 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: girlangler
I suspect it's because mainstream journalists do not see their job as simply to report things as they are, no - they have a much bigger role in life, they've been given a soapbox and by God they'll use it if they can "change the world".
Or something like that...
It is disgusting and appalling.
67
posted on
05/02/2006 8:33:59 AM PDT
by
the anti-liberal
(Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
To: Spiff
To: the anti-liberal
The long term plan:
Europeans should voluntarily and willingly want to go home to their homeland, Europe, so that we can be completely free from Europeans.
We should be teaching the Europeans on our continent their proper shame.
The real border of these European squatters-illegals is at the Atlantic Ocean. Their homeland is Europe.
These are "White" people who are on our continent. Europeans can call themselves "Canadian" or "American" but their homeland is still Europe and they are still trespassing on our continent.
http://mexica-movement.org/timexihcah/KNOWLEDGELIBERATION.htm
To: the anti-liberal
simply to report things as they are
Of course then they may lose a lot of their audience. Without all of the hype most of what happens every day is...boring. :)
70
posted on
05/02/2006 8:51:14 AM PDT
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: P-40
"most of what happens every day is...boring."
The big evil of the century: boredom.
"Boredom picks up where the mind leaves off." - A. R. Orage
Given the state of today's schools, it's no wonder people are so easily bored.
Shameful is what it is...
"May you live in interesting times"
71
posted on
05/02/2006 8:58:14 AM PDT
by
the anti-liberal
(Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
To: the anti-liberal
The big evil of the century: boredom.
And of course we have a Constitutional Right to not be bored. It's in the Constitution...towards the back somewhere. :)
72
posted on
05/02/2006 8:59:56 AM PDT
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: the anti-liberal
True.
I don't even bother with the MSM anymore. I get all my news from the internet. I do watch Fox News some, but don't completely trust them. I see them get used way too much by groups with an agenda, like animal rights groups.
I have to wonder whatever happened to the old school journalist who asked tough questions, and then expected an answer. Nowadays the tough questions go unasked and the interviewer allows the one being questioned to completely skirt around an answer.
73
posted on
05/02/2006 9:04:47 AM PDT
by
girlangler
(I'd rather be fishing)
To: girlangler
I get all my news from the internet.
I find the Wall Street Journal to be a good source of news. It is the only print source I bother with anymore.
74
posted on
05/02/2006 9:06:58 AM PDT
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: Corin Stormhands
Best laught I've had is a while LOL
75
posted on
05/02/2006 9:07:32 AM PDT
by
united1000
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile - hoping it will eat him last. - Sir Winston Churchill)
To: P-40
"It's in the Constitution...towards the back somewhere."
LOL!
It's written in invisible ink - you need to have special glasses, made by Franklin, which when viewed using the appropriate combination of colored lenses allows many heretofore unknown but adamantly expected Constitutional Rights to be found and recognized.
I suggest every member of the Supreme Court each get their pair of special glasses before one more person dies of boredom.
76
posted on
05/02/2006 9:28:32 AM PDT
by
the anti-liberal
(Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
To: girlangler
Frustrating isn't it?
Even with the Internet, people are people and the reporting we get is only as good as the reporters who do the reporting.
I don't have tremendous faith in the ability of the average individual to provide objective reporting, let alone the "highly trained" individual...
77
posted on
05/02/2006 9:31:52 AM PDT
by
the anti-liberal
(Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
To: bcsco
Sorry, but most of the pictures don't come up, neither in Firefox nor IE. Go to Michelle's page, the link is in the title.
78
posted on
05/02/2006 10:25:00 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
("God has given to each a measure of Faith") See we don't even get to pick how much of that we have.)
To: the anti-liberal
I don't have tremendous faith in the ability of the average individual to provide objective reporting, let alone the "highly trained" individual...
I have little faith in either as far as objective *reading* goes either, nor their ability to be selective in what they read.
79
posted on
05/02/2006 10:32:03 AM PDT
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: the anti-liberal; P-40
"Even with the Internet, people are people and the reporting we get is only as good as the reporters who do the reporting."
True.
I also read liberal views, to try to see both sides of each story, but usually I end up just reinforcing my conservative ones :)
80
posted on
05/02/2006 10:32:51 AM PDT
by
girlangler
(I'd rather be fishing)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson