Posted on 06/21/2006 5:52:18 PM PDT by mylife
I'm sure he does not speak out his ass like the Democrats do.
Your nose must work better than mine. All I smell is the same old "MSM controls the news" situation.
It also means Saddam hid them and was in violation of the resolutions brought forth at the conclusion of gulf war I.
Why would he have WMD, if he did not intend to use them?
Recall also that Iraqi soldiers were issued protective gear for chemical weapon attacks, that would be an indicator of intent.
Glad you're here doing damage control for your side, there lefty.
As anyone who has followed this knows, the whole "no WMD" was a lie by the Dems, trying to rewrite history as if WMD stockpiles were required to somehow "justify" our war against Saddam. In actuality it was only the PROSPECT of WMD PRODUCTION and the proliferation to terrorists that was only ONE part of a laundry list of reasons we went in. Dems created the whole lying mythology of their opposition to the war out of whole cloth - this whole cloth. This proves their treason and cowardice - as well as their utter stupidity and lust for power over loyalty to country. And it shatters to pieces their entire "reasoning" on their willingness to surrender.
Now, go back to DU and trade tofu recipes.
That POS Saddam lied thus his intent was to circumvent the UN resolution all along.
I think I heard me say STFU Colmes!
regardless of the efficiency this clearly shows that Saddam did not destroy his stockpiles as he was to do under international order
Not a conclusive one. US troops had CBW gear too.
Oops. My apologies. I didn't read your full post. My analysis of the Dems and the anti-war, anti-Americans stand, but I apologize for automatically lumping you into their side.
I'm sure he would feel differently if he opened a Sarin cannister and took whiff.
For all the talk about the 24 hour news cycle, the journalists actually like to work bankers hours. Many hours ago they slated and scripted their pm line up so that they could spend the evening at important parties where they can see and be seen. Although they are highly paid, they are a lazy, dissolute lot.
good point
Perhaps we should round up the naysayers and a couple sarin canisters and ask them
I bet you're mistaken. Sarin will remain very lethal. And if they're so innocuous, why didn't Saddam get rid of them?
Democrats Lied: Saddam Had WMD.
Love the pic! (Effort for Hopelessness for America)
The UN weapons expert just said on FoxNews that mustard gas would probably have degraded, but that sarin would remain lethal.
Welp The DUmmies have finally gotten the word and are already dismissing this:
2349640, Obla Di, Olbla Dah, Obla bullshit.
Posted by Redstone on Wed Jun-21-06 09:12 PM
Life goes on.
Redstone
2349641, Real old pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, Nothing to see here folks
Posted by Fluffdaddy on Wed Jun-21-06 09:13 PM
2349652, I'm sure our Superfunds would be considered WMDs if another
Posted by The Backlash Cometh on Wed Jun-21-06 09:16 PM
nation dugged up the dumpsites.
2349642, too bad they were old and not of any use.
Posted by uppityperson on Wed Jun-21-06 09:13 PM
blah blah blah
2349648, Where's the Nukes ?
Posted by Fluffdaddy on Wed Jun-21-06 09:14 PM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.