Posted on 06/21/2006 5:52:18 PM PDT by mylife
The Dems will just say now that it too dangerous for our troops there ... we have to pull them back to Okinawa untill the entire country is cleared...
... and it's Bush's fault - if these had stayed buried they would not have threatened anyone .... He had us dig them up ....
bttt
Nope, I didn't think so.
They need a new expert.
If we found a NUKE in Iraq Dems would claim its harmless because Saddam didnt have a delivery system.
These people are loathsome
The only "conclusive" evidence of intent would be if he had pulled the trigger himself and we had it on film.
This is all part of circumstantual evidence, which when combined with other information, one must conclude that we had no choice but to take the SOB out.
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/sarticle.php?id=10101&o=DIB004
above: every American should read the above book by: Richard Miniter. This is only a partial list of the deadly weapons Richard Miniter reveals in his new book, Disinformation. Miniter systematically dissects the "No-WMD Myth" (how it started, and why it continues), as well as 21 other War-on-Terror myths perpetuated by the media.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/07/07/iraq.nuclear/
above - 1.77 metric tons of uranium and 1000 and 1,000 "highly radioactive sources" CNN
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3872201.stm
above - 1.77 metric tons of uranium and 1000 and 1,000 "highly radioactive sources" BBC
http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/m-n/mariani/2004/mariani052804.htm
above - mortor shell sarin gas
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html
above - Roadside Bomb and Mustard gas found FOXNews
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?BRD=1078&dept_id=151021&newsid=12185667&PAG=461&rfi=9
above - WMDs Found in Iraq Consisted of Cyclosarin By MONIKA SCISLOWSKA, Associated Press Writer ©Indiana Printing & Publishing Co.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040624-112920-5897r.htm
above - Iraqi insurgents seek Saddam's chemical arms Washington Times (if the insurgents seek them, then they may know that they are present while are press seems to be naive about it - me). and here is more related to this concern: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39158
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/05/13/sprj.irq.mobile.lab/
above - mobile Bio weapons lab found CNN
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0306/25/se.04.html
above - CNN has learned that the Central Intelligence Agency has in its hands the critical parts of a key piece of Iraqi nuclear technology CNN
http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/2003/david_kay_10022003.html
above - I think this is a good read for all Americans
http://www.iaea.org/worldatom/Programmes/ActionTeam/nwp2.html
above: 27 December 2002, IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)
http://www.kentimmerman.com/2004_04_25syria.htm
above - more interesting reading and here is more from Timmerman: http://www.kentimmerman.com/2004_04_25wmd.htm
http://www.deanesmay.com/archives/005965.html
above - a good essay
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/3/13/115752.shtml?s=lh
Saddam's ambitions are clear
But the final report is this:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-10-06-wmd_x.htm
Good point. Apparently the DoD official they're quoting is referring to the fact that he doesn't currently have the right howitzer or fuzes to fire them.
highly doubt it but sean penn said there are no wmds
The above story alone substantiates the reasons for going into Iraq.
I was listening to FOX and a former military general (I think) said yep there are these 500, plus we have hours of tapes with Saddam talking about WMD and planning to create nukes.
In addition, he said the reason the President and others in the government haven't gotten into the defense of WMD were that Russia, France and China where the ones who helped Iraq move a whole bunch to Syria and had helped Iraq both get these things and then dispose of them.
Because Russia and others are helping now, this general said the President did not want to EMBARRASS them.
No words on the issue though of why we didn't sent special ops into Syria to get the WMD from Iraq.
"Santorum better be careful. Those could easily be old chemical warheads left over from the Iran Iraq war. Most likely not very lethal anymore and of no value as weapons."
There was never a manufactured by date on the weapons. It was incumbent on Saddam that per the UN resolutions, he document all WMD. Saddam didn't, which was reported by the UN investigation team, which is one of the reasons we went in to Iraq.
The Dates are irrelevant, although the left will use that.
ping
ping
Yes and absolutely! :-)
This won't appease the "Bush lied" gaggle of fools, of course, who will simply keep moving the goalposts. But clearly Saddam was in contravention of the UN resolutions that formed Bush's case for intervention. Nor is this dismissable as merely an odd forgotten round; 500 projectiles is a considerable stash.
The thing will be buried, of course.
LOL
The only thing they trade over there is hate, lies and delusions.
Bye, RCnotsoNOVA
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.