Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican trucks to enter U.S. freely? Bush admin. refuses to answer WND's questions [Pathetic]
WorldNet Daily ^ | June 27, 2006 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 06/27/2006 5:21:39 AM PDT by conservativecorner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 06/27/2006 5:21:44 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

There's not one single reason we should allow those mexican rattle traps on our roads and a million of why we shouldn't.


2 posted on 06/27/2006 5:25:07 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush

We don't need no steenking brakes!


3 posted on 06/27/2006 5:25:59 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'... till you can find a rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Sayonara to the U.S. trucking industry as we know it.


4 posted on 06/27/2006 5:35:03 AM PDT by Ranald S. MacKenzie (Its the philosophy, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

We have enough junk American trucks on the road without adding Mexicans driving older used trucks we took off the road. Have their drivers got a required American CDL permit? Can they pass an American CDL lincensing test? Have they got proper Insurance? Will they pay cash for fuel or use a Mexican credit card?

Mr Bush's policy on Mexican immigration is bad enough now without having their junk trucks on the road.This article mentions on site safety inspections in Mexico. Will this be done by American inspectors ? I can see an opportunity for graft by the inspectors that will become shocking.


5 posted on 06/27/2006 5:35:12 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranald S. MacKenzie

"Sayonara to the U.S. trucking industry as we know it."

And the Longshoreman's Union as well.


6 posted on 06/27/2006 5:38:55 AM PDT by Hornet19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hornet19

"And the Longshoreman's Union as well. "

Speaking of which, where are they? Why aren't they down at the border raising sand about these issues? Strange, ya reckon they were paid off?


7 posted on 06/27/2006 6:24:47 AM PDT by brushcop (Lt. Harris, SFC Salie, CPL Long, SPC Hornbeck, B-Co, 2/69 3ID We will remember you always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: brushcop

Go to spp.gov and read.


8 posted on 06/27/2006 6:35:52 AM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
The Teamsters Union has fought NAFTA since the 1990s, concerned that the ultimate plan was to undermine union trucking as well as independent truckers who are owner-operators.
___________________________________________________________

Why don't the teamsters go after Afscme or the aflcio, these others unions openly support a comprehensive guest worker program. They see dollar signs and a way to get more union workers down the road.
9 posted on 06/27/2006 6:43:12 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush

It is even worse if you are sitting at a red light, and one of them rear ends you. " No money....no blakes......no money no blakes"


10 posted on 06/27/2006 7:07:09 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (If you got Sowell, you got Soul !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ranald S. MacKenzie
Sayonara to the U.S. trucking industry as we know it.

And the thousands upon thousands of American families that depend on that work for their livlihood...

11 posted on 06/27/2006 7:20:44 AM PDT by Iscool (I spent MOST of my MONEY on cold beer and hot women...The REST, I just wasted ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
"Sayonara to the U.S. trucking industry as we know it."

Sayonara to the U.S. as we know it

12 posted on 06/27/2006 7:34:14 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

As the free-traitors would probably say, "Just hauling goods that Americans won't haul."....../sarc


13 posted on 06/27/2006 10:55:04 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

Actually, this free-trader can say without equivocation to the Teamster truckers that hauled my steel: eff you, and you still owe me roughly 15 thousand dollars.


14 posted on 06/27/2006 10:59:23 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Why do Teamster truckers owe you $15K for hauling your steel? Is there not a legal remedy available in your circumstance if conditions warrant? Just wondering.


15 posted on 06/27/2006 11:13:15 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

Lost commissions and bonuses. My company collected its damages, but since mine were based on sales, I was SOL.


16 posted on 06/27/2006 11:17:12 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Ouch! I'd be cussing them too. Legally, can you contend that you suffered damages too from the freight hauler or would your company frown on any such personal action?


17 posted on 06/27/2006 11:26:02 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb
A number of immediate problems: 1. actual damages difficult to prove, 2. company counsel not willing to get involved, 3. private counsel would likely advise to sue my employer, etc. It was easier just to find a better job.
18 posted on 06/27/2006 11:35:56 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Ahh, yes. Company counsel. I unfortunately have to work with them on a daily basis in my line of work. They should all be flogged weekly just on general principles. My condolences.


19 posted on 06/27/2006 11:53:48 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

I really don't mind. His duty is (was) to the corporation, not little ol' me. With all the cross-suits that would inevitably occur, he would've been unable to represent me anyway.


20 posted on 06/27/2006 12:57:28 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson