Skip to comments.
Mexican trucks to enter U.S. freely? Bush admin. refuses to answer WND's questions [Pathetic]
WorldNet Daily ^
| June 27, 2006
| Jerome Corsi
Posted on 06/27/2006 5:21:39 AM PDT by conservativecorner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: conservativecorner
There's not one single reason we should allow those mexican rattle traps on our roads and a million of why we shouldn't.
2
posted on
06/27/2006 5:25:07 AM PDT
by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: Bikers4Bush
We don't need no steenking brakes!
3
posted on
06/27/2006 5:25:59 AM PDT
by
ovrtaxt
(Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'... till you can find a rock.)
To: conservativecorner
Sayonara to the U.S. trucking industry as we know it.
To: conservativecorner
We have enough junk American trucks on the road without adding Mexicans driving older used trucks we took off the road. Have their drivers got a required American CDL permit? Can they pass an American CDL lincensing test? Have they got proper Insurance? Will they pay cash for fuel or use a Mexican credit card?
Mr Bush's policy on Mexican immigration is bad enough now without having their junk trucks on the road.This article mentions on site safety inspections in Mexico. Will this be done by American inspectors ? I can see an opportunity for graft by the inspectors that will become shocking.
5
posted on
06/27/2006 5:35:12 AM PDT
by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: Ranald S. MacKenzie
"Sayonara to the U.S. trucking industry as we know it."
And the Longshoreman's Union as well.
6
posted on
06/27/2006 5:38:55 AM PDT
by
Hornet19
To: Hornet19
"And the Longshoreman's Union as well. "
Speaking of which, where are they? Why aren't they down at the border raising sand about these issues? Strange, ya reckon they were paid off?
7
posted on
06/27/2006 6:24:47 AM PDT
by
brushcop
(Lt. Harris, SFC Salie, CPL Long, SPC Hornbeck, B-Co, 2/69 3ID We will remember you always.)
To: brushcop
8
posted on
06/27/2006 6:35:52 AM PDT
by
jocko12
To: conservativecorner
The Teamsters Union has fought NAFTA since the 1990s, concerned that the ultimate plan was to undermine union trucking as well as independent truckers who are owner-operators.
___________________________________________________________
Why don't the teamsters go after Afscme or the aflcio, these others unions openly support a comprehensive guest worker program. They see dollar signs and a way to get more union workers down the road.
To: Bikers4Bush
It is even worse if you are sitting at a red light, and one of them rear ends you. " No money....no blakes......no money no blakes"
10
posted on
06/27/2006 7:07:09 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(If you got Sowell, you got Soul !)
To: Ranald S. MacKenzie
Sayonara to the U.S. trucking industry as we know it.And the thousands upon thousands of American families that depend on that work for their livlihood...
11
posted on
06/27/2006 7:20:44 AM PDT
by
Iscool
(I spent MOST of my MONEY on cold beer and hot women...The REST, I just wasted ...)
To: Iscool
"Sayonara to the U.S. trucking industry as we know it."
Sayonara to the U.S. as we know it
12
posted on
06/27/2006 7:34:14 AM PDT
by
jpsb
To: conservativecorner
As the free-traitors would probably say, "Just hauling goods that Americans won't haul."....../sarc
13
posted on
06/27/2006 10:55:04 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
To: OB1kNOb
Actually, this free-trader can say without equivocation to the Teamster truckers that hauled my steel: eff you, and you still owe me roughly 15 thousand dollars.
14
posted on
06/27/2006 10:59:23 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
Why do Teamster truckers owe you $15K for hauling your steel? Is there not a legal remedy available in your circumstance if conditions warrant? Just wondering.
15
posted on
06/27/2006 11:13:15 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
To: OB1kNOb
Lost commissions and bonuses. My company collected its damages, but since mine were based on sales, I was SOL.
16
posted on
06/27/2006 11:17:12 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
Ouch! I'd be cussing them too. Legally, can you contend that you suffered damages too from the freight hauler or would your company frown on any such personal action?
17
posted on
06/27/2006 11:26:02 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
To: OB1kNOb
A number of immediate problems: 1. actual damages difficult to prove, 2. company counsel not willing to get involved, 3. private counsel would likely advise to sue my employer, etc. It was easier just to find a better job.
18
posted on
06/27/2006 11:35:56 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
Ahh, yes. Company counsel. I unfortunately have to work with them on a daily basis in my line of work. They should all be flogged weekly just on general principles. My condolences.
19
posted on
06/27/2006 11:53:48 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
To: OB1kNOb
I really don't mind. His duty is (was) to the corporation, not little ol' me. With all the cross-suits that would inevitably occur, he would've been unable to represent me anyway.
20
posted on
06/27/2006 12:57:28 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson