Posted on 06/30/2006 7:49:06 PM PDT by calcowgirl
:-)
The Dems will slave for a vote from every pervert and criminal they can muster -- this is just more of the same.
The devil has a huge foothold in this world now. It is falling fast. A great wrath is sure to come.
Kinda reminds me of the time when these two gays were down at the doc in Alemeda. The one commented on the next arriving "Ferry boat!" The other one said in his best effeminent voice... "Gee, I knew we were organized, but I had no idea we already had a Navy!!!"
How 'bout "Whoa!" Instead of woe??? Well... how 'bout both!!!
The following GLBT related legislation is currently in process in the California Legislature. While some of these bills sound generic in nature, all are being supported by major GLBT activist organizations in California as advancing homosexual rights.
"Homosexual Rights" = rights premised in a practiced disordered activity rejected by society and not Constitutionally guaranteed...
In essence, GLBT activist organizations are attempting to get government to sanction and subsidize disordered activity rejected by society and not Constitutionally guaranteed...
Often in the news one hears about the supposed wall of separation between Church (Constitutionally guaranteed practice) & State... WELL --what about the separation between Homosexual Sex (not Constitutionally guaranteed practice rejected by society) & State?
So basically, unless it is celebration of homosexual activity, it is not tolerance. In other words, it will be illegal in California schools and elsewhere to believe homosexual activity is immoral or sinful.
I read an article that quoted CRA's Mike Spence referring to "four gay rights bills working through the Legisture." That is what started my search. Instead of four, I found many, many more. They just don't give up; they are organized and very well funded.
Hey c'mon! Knock off the attempt to draw up some sort of equivalence of obnoxiousness!! That just isn't at all possible!!! Shame on you!!!
What amazes me most when looking at this list of bills is that with California having such a huge structural deficit the legislature has the nerve to take the time and effort away from basic fiscal management.
Gee, I'm glad the teachings of his Catholic faith mean so much to Arnold! Yet another CINO in the mold of Kennedy and Kerry...
You got it! I think that is one of the more egregious bills.
Maybe Arnold is taking a cue from George Bush. Just as Bush decided to use Iraq as the battlefield to attract and fight Muslims, Arnold is creating California as the battleground to war with homosexuals. Coming from Massachusetts, I welcome this new strategy.</p>
"Wrong as usual. See post #7."
LMAO,as usual.
From Cosmopolitan magazine, "I have no sexual standards in my head that say this is good or this is bad. Homosexual-that only means to me that he enjoys sex with a man and I enjoy sex with a woman. It's all legitimate to me." He also supports gay adoption, despite the fact that both conservative Republicans and moderate Democrats voted by a 61 percent margin for Proposition 22, the Defense of Marriage Initiative, which defined marriage as that between a man and a woman. Newsmax, 28 July 2003 When interviewed on the issues by Sean Hannity on August 27th, Schwarzenegger admitted that he is for legalized "domestic partnerships" which would give gay couples the same benefits as marriage.
I closely followed your public efforts to gather this information on at least two other threads and was expecting this unified presentation. Lots of effort and, as usual, an informative and accurate thread.
But that wasn't the point, nor a cheap shoot. The point was style, after the fact. A style many have come to loath. A style that brands the author a fanatic rather than prudent. A style that neuters the message, no matter how much utility or veracity employed.
Some of the legislation referred to the "protected classes" (AB 2800, for one).
The more we create these "special rights" groups, the more reverse discrimination will appear.
As long as it is heterosexual in nature I will sanction such stimulation...
;-)
With all due respect, I apologize if you loath the style. It was an attempt to provide information and to energize those who are concerned to contact the Governor and their legislators. You may consider this fanaticism, but I am no fanatic. I did try to be thorough and hence the comparison was way off base, IMO. Prudence? I don't understand what you mean by that.
Last year, on the same day that Arnold vetoed the Gay Marriage bill, I found a slew of legislation that was passed giving yet more rights to the "protected class." (see post #9) There had been little to no media coverage of the bills as they made their way through the legislature. I saw this as an opportunity to identify this year's bills early and to possibly influence the outcome unstead of waiting until they passed and hoping for a Governor veto (something, that given past performance, I don't think we can count on.)
These pro-GLBT groups are well organized. I'm sure they are calling to voice their support. If those with opposing views remain silent, we can expect to lose the activism fight.
My point was valid ... and the concern offered appropriate. One account is among the most valuable assets this topic has. The other a PITA, tolerated only by our instincts for civility.
If the former gets branded with the reputation of blind fanaticism, which the latter has deservedly earned, then we both suffer a critical loss in our common struggle against liberalism.
I'm not prepared to suffer in silence but I do apologize if my concerns, offered publicly, have offended your sensibilities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.