Posted on 07/09/2006 9:22:35 AM PDT by prairiebreeze
They are not whistle-blowers. They're political hacks with an anti-America agenda, and unconvicted felons.
Is it ANY WONDER Bush has to keep things SECRET?
Geesh!
That phrase has ceased to have any meaning.
BY LAW you cannot punch a police officer and walk away scot free.
BY LAW you cannot invade a country and assume all rights as a citizen.
BY LAW you cannot murder someone and walk away and occupy a seat in the US CONgress for life.
BY LAW as a US SINator you cannot warn other countries that the USA is about to invade and continue to hold your SINate seat.
BY LAW you cannot commit treason as an officer of the US Military and run for or hold an office in any government entity.
BY LAW if you drive under the influence of anything, there are consequences.
BY LAW you cannot leak national secrets and go unpunished.
BY LAW you cannot give nuclear technology to foreign hostile regimes and continue to walk free.
I don't have time for this. The LAW has become a joke.
The congressman's letter says "may be a violation", yet you know that it has happened and the executive is guilty. I'm betting you know this without being able to show a shread of evidence otherwise.
The letter was sent in May. Maybe this program is already known in the public now.
I'm betting congress leaks this type of information within the day of receipt. At least the NYTimes showed the courtesy to give the executive several weeks of negotiation to convince them not to commit treason before thumbing their noses to that request.
Yep, the Bush Admin should have thoroughly cleaned house, starting with State Dept. I'm sure if the truth be known these whistleblowers are leftovers from the clintoonian administration.
Glad they briefed the SWIFT program to congress.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
I am late to this thread as I tape and watch this program after Church.
I am from Michigan and have followed Hoekstra for sometime. This is my take and it is complete conjecture.
Hoekstra and Goss were very close. Goss helped Hoekstra get the gig as Chairman of the committee. I think Goss was sick of getting stepped on by Negroponte and informed Pete of a program that he was not in the loop on. Pete goes to the administration and asked what is up and why is Negroponte not telling us about this stuff. Bush has to choose who to support. The resignation points to who he chose.
I would be very interested in the exact date that letter was sent and how close it was to the resignation.
What the White House should brief on and what the White House has to brief on are two different things. Unless there is something that says when Congress has to be informed then I don't think Hoekstra has legal grounds to complain.
"Imagine, a "penchant for secrecy" while fighting a war. Hard to believe, isn't it?"
Yeah, that d*mn Bush just insists on protecting the American people. What is that all about? /s
This is silly...Congress has been signing off on "Black Budgets" for years.
They can't be briefed on every program. Hoekstra obviously is aligning himself with the RINOs of late, so I am assuming that the program was a piddly program that only Hoekstra thought was "major."
Maybe they should be hearing a lot more from us. I hate when they always say "The American people Say - or "Want to know".
They sure don't speak for me!!
They seem to have no clue - or don't give a darn about what we think!!
It's all well and good for the President to keep Congress informed if he wants to in order to foster good relations and to ensure funding of programs that he wants. But he doesn't have to, and Congressional comments that imply that it is his job to bring them into the loop on administrative matters should be shot down.
Contrary to what the press says, Bush is ceding a ton of executive powers during his administration, not enlarging them. He has acquiesced to a number of judicial decisions that are patently without merit and which attempt to insert the judiciary into the commander in chief role. He has let the legislature force him to make them "co-executives". He has let the MSM pressure him into appointing a special prosecutor that is not authorized by law and who has since gone off on a wild goose chase. He has left Clinton holdovers in office far too long, and let them wage war against the civilian leadership (Tenet at CIA and all the careerists at State). He has refused to enforce laws that make criminal the disclosure of secrets. He has refused to fight back when people called him a liar and misrepresented the basis for the Iraq war. He has refused to use the veto pen once, even signing the unconstitutional campaign finance reform, which only the O'Connor court could have found constitutional. He smirked "I have political capital" and then proceeded to waste it on a failed SS reform that had no political support from day 1.
This is the incredible shrinking presidency. It will take a strong personality to restore the powers of this office, to tell someone like Hoekstra what's what, to tell the Supreme Court to go to hell when they try to interfere with the conduct of a war, and to assert the will of the president over the bureaucracies. Future presidents will have people saying, "but Bush never did that...you tyrant!"
We are not a monarchy. The President's powers as Commander in Chief are extensive, but even Washington had to beg from the Continental Congress under a more makeshift law -- and when General Washington could have construed his power as dictatorial, monarchial. He did not and set a standard which is in the law today -- that law is called the Constitution.
What happens when we have a traitorous underground in high places whose only agenda is to bring this president down?
"We are not a monarchy. The President's powers as Commander in Chief are extensive, but even Washington had to beg from the Continental Congress under a more makeshift law -- and when General Washington could have construed his power as dictatorial, monarchial. He did not and set a standard which is in the law today -- that law is called the Constitution."
BS.
Congressional oversight of intelligence agencies is the bastard child of the Church committee and others who wanted to neuter our intel agencies. (And they did a good job accomplishing that.)
The law everyone is referring only was enacted in 1980. Somehow this country made it through many crises and wars and years without it -- and without becoming a dictatorship.
If George Washington could sustain and win under more adverse situation, Mr. Bush, Commander, can do so in his turn, without putting on the robes of a monarch, or flying a standard of a dictator, a good one, like a Cinnciatus, yet still a dicator. As George Washington, first amoung men and Father of our Country refused that historically proven role of benevolent dicator and/or monarch, and by so doing created a New World, so to should all Presidents of this Republic continue that legacy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.