Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vernon Robinson AD ~ Finally a Candidate I agree with COMPLETELY (Vanity)
vernonrobinson.com ^ | Vernon Robinson

Posted on 07/11/2006 10:39:14 AM PDT by Danae

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Tax-chick; Syncro; Swanks

Owrking the crowd, sounds painful.

(I know, I know, it was "orking", which I will have to use later on somewhere. But I must admit that it does look like my one typo of "owrk".)

How is everyone?


41 posted on 07/11/2006 4:45:00 PM PDT by Darksheare (Caution, objects in mirror are not really in the mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Just fine. Too much owrk, but that's not new :-).


42 posted on 07/11/2006 5:26:14 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Have some hyperbolic rodomontade, and nothing worse will happen for the rest of the day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Oh MANNNN!!! Brought a major smile to my face! Sorry I didn't hear Rush talk about this.

-- Joe


43 posted on 07/11/2006 6:41:14 PM PDT by Joe Republc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Yeah, I'm on nights, from 11 P.M. to 7 A.M...


44 posted on 07/11/2006 7:10:57 PM PDT by Darksheare (Caution, objects in mirror are not really in the mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

Nope.

For--profit corporations have commercials. Political campaigns have ads. A political campaign's use of copywrited music, images or footage is the quintessential example of the "Fair Use Doctrine" in play. No political campaign has ever been successfully sued for copywright infringement in federal court.

For example, a conservative 527 organization called "Club for Growth" used several seconds of the 50's classic "The Blob" in one of its ads. Although it was sued, after a year of litigation, the Club for Growth won. There is just significantly more latitude because it is not commercial use. The owner of the copywright would be hard pressed to show actual damages.

It is an interesting legal question, though. And we do get form letter nastygrams from time to time. But a political campaigns ads (it isn't commerce, so calling it a commercial is actually inaccurate...) enjoy core protected speech. There is no example of free speech that enjoys more protection than political speech. Whole statutes carve out political speech as an exception -- it even reaches parody material ( e.g. Saturday Night Live, Rush's parodies).

Here's another example -- Rush Limbaugh pays royalties for use of the "Pretenders" song for his show theme song -- but for his parodies, he isn't paying royalties for whatever material may use "copywrighted" material -- whole different world.

Glad you liked the ad. :)


45 posted on 07/11/2006 7:19:48 PM PDT by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PDR

Exactly.

And a nasty campaigner to boot.


46 posted on 07/11/2006 7:23:35 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson