Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: NormsRevenge
To offset the estimated annual price tag of $200 million, firms with 20 or more workers would be required to spend $1.06 for each hour worked by an employee, and those with more than 100 workers would have to pay $1.60 per hour up to a monthly maximum of $180 per worker. Companies that already offer health coverage would still have to pay if their insurance contributions did not meet the city's funding levels. See how easy it is to spend other people's money??? Govt does it all the time. Every warning label, safety regulation and most of the social benefits cost other people money, not the actual implementing entity.
Obviously the people in SF pay too much in taxes if the city has this kind of money to throw around.
if they get any fed tax money, I want it cut off. I don't want my money going to pay for this communism.
35 posted on
07/18/2006 6:10:28 PM PDT by
HeartlandOfAmerica
(Middle East Interactive Map: http://interneticsonline.com.dish5009.net.ibizdns.com/MEMap.html)
To: NormsRevenge
To offset the estimated annual price tag of $200 million, firms with 20 or more workers would be required to spend $1.06 for each hour worked by an employee, and those with more than 100 workers would have to pay $1.60 per hour up to a monthly maximum of $180 per worker. Companies that already offer health coverage would still have to pay if their insurance contributions did not meet the city's funding levels.
Gee, If I had a San Francisco business with 21 employees, two of my workers are going to lose their jobs tomorrow. Sad. Too bad. This is the "Law of Unintended Consequences"...
39 posted on
07/18/2006 6:16:35 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!")
To: NormsRevenge
Stupid people.
Employers will drop their health plans to let the city take care of it - they are stuck with the bill either way. In addition talented health care providers will leave the city to get more lucrative work elsewhere. I wouldn't be surprised if many simply setup their offices outside the city limits and abandon the city altogether.
41 posted on
07/18/2006 6:17:35 PM PDT by
DB
(©)
To: NormsRevenge
What's the cost of having your sphincter sewed back up nowadays?
To: NormsRevenge
...and when the crunch comes, it'll be somebody else's fault. Probably George Bush's.
48 posted on
07/18/2006 6:23:34 PM PDT by
Grut
To: NormsRevenge
The Peoples Republic of San Francisco. Bless their little pink hearts. I just love their view that all they need to do is
"to offset the estimated annual price tag of $200 million" In your dreams SF. It's going to cost a lot more than that. The homeless will spend that much. Don't know whether to laugh or cry. OK, I'll guess I'll laugh.
To: NormsRevenge
SF is as good a place as any for a test case of this system. It should be interesting watching the resulting meltdown. Let's hope SOMEONE takes notes and learns from it.
50 posted on
07/18/2006 6:27:12 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: NormsRevenge
firms with 20 or more workers would be required to spend $1.06 for each hour worked by an employee Small businesses are all preparing to divide their companies into 19 or less.
To: NormsRevenge
My understanding is that federal law prevents state and local governments from mandating what health insurance employers must provide their employees. As such this law would presumably be thrown out under the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution.
57 posted on
07/18/2006 6:44:31 PM PDT by
Moral Hazard
("Matt Damon" - Matt Damon)
To: NormsRevenge
Well they already have all the dealers and drugs on the streets that they need. It is just a small step to declare them all doctors and this plan is implemented.
To: NormsRevenge
GOOD.....we can watch it fail....
66 posted on
07/18/2006 7:10:52 PM PDT by
goodnesswins
( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
To: NormsRevenge
The ordinance adopted Tuesday calls for businesses with more than 50 employees to start participating starting next July, while it would take effect for enterprises with 20 or more workers in April 2008. What are they waiting for? For the politicos to retire?
Why don't they start it next week? Why not mandate it for businesses with only 2 employees??
Come on! Let's shut down all business in San Francisco!
68 posted on
07/18/2006 7:27:50 PM PDT by
balrog666
(Ignorance is never better than knowledge. - Enrico Fermi)
To: NormsRevenge
The same San Fransicko Board of Stupidvisors that tried to impeach Bush.
70 posted on
07/18/2006 7:52:31 PM PDT by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: NormsRevenge
How, by any measure, can San Francisco still be considered a part of these United States? Little Cuba by the Bay.
To: NormsRevenge
HIV treatment is very expensive.
I give this socialist experiment 6 weeks.
75 posted on
07/18/2006 8:09:13 PM PDT by
Reddy
(America, Bless God!)
To: NormsRevenge
This plan is going to balloon into a multibillion dollar liability on the city within 2 fiscal years of going live.
I see a business oppurtunity though, set up a hotel with less than 20 employees and set up a website in 10 languages offering free medical care vacations for people throughout the world. Offer free jitney service to and from the hospital. 100% occupancy rates for however long this scheme of the insane goes on.
To: NormsRevenge
81 posted on
07/18/2006 8:26:45 PM PDT by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: MadLibDisease
82 posted on
07/18/2006 8:30:39 PM PDT by
MadLibDisease
(The mahdi is full of pig crap)
To: Drango
To: NormsRevenge
And the folks in SanFran can pay for it!
86 posted on
07/18/2006 10:43:03 PM PDT by
Just Lori
(To everything, there is a season.........Ecclesiastes, 3:1-8)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson