Posted on 09/09/2006 12:57:44 PM PDT by Lorianne
Of course in 1998 and 1999 conservatives were frustrated the American people constantly gave high marks to Clinton, as stupid as that was. We warned everyone there would be trouble ahead thanks to his inaction. Now we see we were right. This movie wants to present that story but of course Clinton and his flunkies don't want the truth known.
So now it's all Monica's fault the Clinton didn't catch Bin Laden?
OT but related - I just got back from the video store and saw on the shelf a just released movie called "The 9/11 Commission Report." It's a dramatization. They were out of them so I couldn't rent it to view. I looked up the info about the movie..check this out > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0840272/
Does anyone know anything about this movie?
Here's a video clip from Tom Brokaw and NBC showing footage of Drone images of Bin Laden. Discusses faults of Clinton and Bush for failure to get OBL.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JuH1xwLUnbg
True.
To be historically accurate they need to add in information about the WALL the Clinton people put up. Would Berger be upset if ABC showed him commiting the crime of stealing top secret classified documents? A crime by the way that would get anyone else (non-liberal) a charge of treason and a LOOOOONG time in federal prison.
Also I do not recall any threats of legislative punishment by conservatives over the so-called Reagan pic.
True ... a matter of degree rather thank kind.
Fortunately for us, they've never been accused of being smart. Lying, deceitful, evil, smug, and without conscience, but never smart.
bookmarked
Sandy can't sue anybody. This is a docudrama. It is not a transcript of the 9-11 Committee's report. We saw "live" what a farce that was. I hope this contains some of the info that Weldon spoke of......
"I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky". Now, that was pure fiction....the lying bast***.
This is a gonna get a bery bery interesting ........ /chuckle
Burglar hinted last night that he might sue!!! He is a PATHETIC POS.
What?Do you you expect to stop in the middle of a BJ just because of something trivial as our nation's security being at stake?[sarcasm of course]
I loved the part that says.....,.
Any scene Clinton objects to, they should black out with a screen that says
"The Democrats in Congress have threatened to pull our license if we show this scene."
Then at the end, they should run a cartoon of Sandy Berger stuffing documents down his pants, and Madeliene Albright doing her toast with Kim Jong "I'm So Ronery"
Interestingly, the timeline does not include the first WTC bombing in 1983. Why would they have made so obvious an omission? I don't believe he was yet involved with that particular intern, and he certainly wasn't under attack from the eeevvvviiillll VRWC!!!!! So what gives there, do you think?
I STILL have a sinking feeling that we may be being had. It might have already been edited to show Bush being the responsible one and that Clinton is a HERO!! I feel like it's Charlie Brown's football.
All those years that bunch smeared anybody's reputation that dared crossed them,and they've got the nerve to talk about libel.Everybody knows the only effort he made was to cover his ass whever he got it in a jam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.