Skip to comments.
Sex scandal kept Clinton's eye off bin Laden threat, TV drama says
The Times Online (UK) ^
| 09 September 2006
| Tim Reid
Posted on 09/09/2006 12:57:44 PM PDT by Lorianne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: Suzy Quzy
I STILL have a sinking feeling that we may be being had Yah, same here ... I smell a Rat too :(
To: Rb ver. 2.0
42
posted on
09/09/2006 1:38:18 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
To: Lorianne
Hopefully, Clinton's protestation would backfire and draw public attention back to the Lewinsky affair, which is to amnesiac and rabid Clintonistas and delirious moonbats what the crucifix is to Dracula : a blinding and excruciating truth...
To: Mr_Moonlight
Let's pray not, but it will surprise me if it's NOT a trick.
44
posted on
09/09/2006 1:39:51 PM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: Lorianne
45
posted on
09/09/2006 1:40:07 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: Suzy Quzy
Oh Suzy Q.....
Oh Suzy Q.....
Oh Suzy Q...Baby I love you...
Suzy Q.....
Ahhh.Just had to sing one of my all time favorite CCR hits.
Quzy on.....eheheheheh! CCR's Cosmo's Factory was awesome.
OK.... now back to the Democrat Pravda censorists.
46
posted on
09/09/2006 1:40:41 PM PDT
by
tflabo
(Take authority that's ours)
To: tflabo
Went well with my popcorn!! :)
47
posted on
09/09/2006 1:42:44 PM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: Suzy Quzy
In a way, I think you're right. Because everything that came before 9-11 is not the "picture that will forever be remembered in our minds". And that occurred on Bush's watch.
No where in the 9-11 report is Clinton criticized. Clarke and Gorelick and the others made sure of that. The report itself was the docu-drama of the century!!
After our homeland was hit in NY...our Mainland I remind you...Do any of you remember ANY increase in Security being established??
Bubba's 2000 State of the Union is very clear. "Maybe in 10 or 20 years, we may be under a real threat".
48
posted on
09/09/2006 1:44:19 PM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Suzy Quzy
In a way, I think you're right. Because everything that came before 9-11 is not the "picture that will forever be remembered in our minds". And that occurred on Bush's watch.
No where in the 9-11 report is Clinton criticized. Clarke and Gorelick and the others made sure of that. The report itself was the docu-drama of the century!!
After our homeland was hit in NY...our Mainland I remind you...Do any of you remember ANY increase in Security being established??
Bubba's 2000 State of the Union is very clear. "Maybe in 10 or 20 years, we may be under a real threat".
49
posted on
09/09/2006 1:44:20 PM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
That screen shot would be a blessing. It would be outstanding if the clinton regime would make them mad enough to do this.
To: MNJohnnie
The Sink Emperor remains the most divisive figure in American politics.
51
posted on
09/09/2006 1:47:02 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: Lorianne
How Clinton Kept Bin Laden Free
By Richard Miniter Washington Times | September 8, 2003
"Sudan offered to arrest and turn over bin Laden at this meeting, according to (Minister of State for Defense Elfatih) Erwa. He brought up bin Laden directly. "Where should we send him?" he asked."
"Finally, the CIA official spoke. "We have nothing we can hold him on,"
"Over the next few months and years, Sudan would repeatedly try to provide its voluminous intelligence files on bin Laden to the CIA, the FBI, and senior Clinton Administration officials and would be repeatedly rebuffed through both formal and informal channels. This was one of the greatest intelligence failures of the Clinton years the result of orders that came from the Clinton White House."
frontpagemag.com/
52
posted on
09/09/2006 1:49:57 PM PDT
by
Daaave
(The flesh eating jinn of Komari.)
To: Suzy Quzy
Amazing that Bill and Hill, the two most dishonest people to ever live in the White House would say someone else was lying....when have they told the truth? Bill committed perjury and was impeached in the House, and everytime Hillary testified she "couldn't recall", she was lying but it couldn't be proved. If she didn't lie, then the American people were misled when told how smart she was! The Clinton Administration was corrupt and those who tried to be honest were punished. I don't know how Sandy Berger, the Burglar, can show his face in public when everyone knows if there had been any justice in his case, he would be in prison now! Hope he does sue if it will allow all the info about his burglary to be made public!
Bush could have saved himself a lot of trouble had he replaced the Clinton holdovers....mainly George Tenet and Richard Clark.
53
posted on
09/09/2006 1:50:27 PM PDT
by
PeskyOne
To: Lorianne
Actually it is the kind of protest, not the degree. I can threaten to boycott a TV station or network over programming I disagree with. That is one kind of protest.
If I were a congressman with legislative powers, and I threatened to punish a TV program or network over the content of their programs that is CENSORSHIP. I don't recall ANY Republicans suggesting threats of legislative punishment over the streisand/brolin Reagan pic or over the Dan Rather lies about President Bush's Guard service.
54
posted on
09/09/2006 1:51:27 PM PDT
by
feedback doctor
(HATE - The core value of liberalism)
To: MNJohnnie
yes, they do. The MSM gives them a pass.
BTW does anyone know if ABC has said affirmativly they are NOT canceling it?
55
posted on
09/09/2006 1:57:57 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: PeskyOne
Its so funny..They believed their own propaganda. Really a fatal flaw.
56
posted on
09/09/2006 2:03:34 PM PDT
by
sgtyork
(Prove to us that you can enforce the borders first.)
To: All
Just curious!
Does anyone know if any of the 'anti-Bush' parts in it have been edited, or have THEY all been left in?
I think I already know the answer.
57
posted on
09/09/2006 2:04:13 PM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
To: AmeriBrit
I think I already know the answer. Yeah, you do. Which proves Republicans respect Free Speech, Democrats see it as a threat.
58
posted on
09/09/2006 2:06:54 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? Samurai? Fascists?)
To: Lorianne
Wow, they're really screaming and squirming.....!
59
posted on
09/09/2006 2:07:38 PM PDT
by
cowdog77
To: Lorianne
Any democrat expressing an opinion that certain scenes not be shown, is espousing censorship and is unfit for office. "Accuracy" as determined by politicians is not the issue.
60
posted on
09/09/2006 2:17:15 PM PDT
by
Williams
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson