Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex scandal kept Clinton's eye off bin Laden threat, TV drama says
The Times Online (UK) ^ | 09 September 2006 | Tim Reid

Posted on 09/09/2006 12:57:44 PM PDT by Lorianne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: Irish Eyes

Dear Former President Clinton . . The American people gave you a shot at the brass ring, the chance to do a good job - but you rather chose to attempt to CUCKOLD the people, most likely thinking all the while that your disloyal and disgraceful behavior would not be found out; that you would glide easily into the annals of history unscathed and even lauded as an elder statesman of great import. - The secret, I think, is just this: the American people are really better and more noble in general than you in your apparent conceit have seemed to think they are. Good men have died to keep this country from falling as you and your educated F.O.B.'s were taught it would eventually - and "who cares?" you and your buddies thought. You and your crowd are not worthy of them, Sir.

The Republicans did not do this to you. You did it to yourself and only YOU know the truth of many of the accusations against you. You know the truth of your treatment of Mrs. Broadrick just to cite one example. You know the truth of your puerile dalliances with Miss Lewinsky, (you might as well have "done the deed" with her -but, oh, I forgot, you evidently prefer juvenile servicing); and so do the American people - and all but the most warped Democrat socialists hold you in much less respectful regard than you might have wished. - Too bad, just be glad you'll still be able to draw your living off the government and other fringe benefits the rest of your mortal life just as you have most likely done up to now by trading on your dubious "charm". We are not your judges, Christ is the ultimate judge, and your business henceforth, Sir, is with Him.

Do I think you will read these posts on FR? Not really. You are most likely too busy basking in the afterglow of the worshipful adoration constantly heaped upon you by people that you secretly do not even respect yourself; people who are hoping to score brownie points with one they hope will become the next First Lady.


61 posted on 09/09/2006 2:23:24 PM PDT by Twinkie (Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cowdog77

Wow, they're really screaming and squirming.....!

62 posted on 09/09/2006 2:24:38 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne

The Clintonoids have NO SHAME.....they are DANGEROUS.


63 posted on 09/09/2006 2:25:25 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Methinks he doeth protest too much
64 posted on 09/09/2006 2:29:39 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
Let's pray not, but it will surprise me if it's NOT a trick.

Ya never really know until after the fact. Perhaps some of the suits at ABC had an attack of concienciousness overcome them while looking at the networks sagging ratings and money bleed and so began an insurrection within to help bolster its viable market. Obviously ABC throwing in their ante with the radical left wasn't turning into a lucrative business model, so perhaps there is an internal insurrection within to turn the tide. We can hope, can't we?

65 posted on 09/09/2006 2:29:41 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight (The Power of Positive Thinking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight

Hope springs ETERNAL!!! But I still plan on being had!!


66 posted on 09/09/2006 2:30:55 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore

In this one, Keitel wusses out...trying to save future acting jobs perhaps, not get blacklisted out of Hollyweird??


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNm36FSV8yI&mode=related&search=


67 posted on 09/09/2006 2:31:54 PM PDT by tina07 (In Memory of my Father - WWII Army Air Force Veteran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tina07

corrections with scissors he meant to say!


68 posted on 09/09/2006 2:34:58 PM PDT by tina07 (In Memory of my Father - WWII Army Air Force Veteran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

B.S. The clinton 'administration' would have done nothing either way.


69 posted on 09/09/2006 2:35:29 PM PDT by gedeon3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne
Bush could have saved himself a lot of trouble had he replaced the Clinton holdovers....mainly George Tenet and Richard Clark.

Bush tried to be a consensus builder, normally this would be a respectable strong suit but in the world of Rats it turns into a character weakness. Bush tried to swim with the sharks and make friends with them, but all the sharks did is what they always do ... shread everything in sight

70 posted on 09/09/2006 2:39:41 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
That is a great banner ABC should put on The Path To 911.

What will happen to Rush Limbaugh, Freerepublic and Alan Keyes?

Even YOUTUBE should be worried if the democrats gain control!

71 posted on 09/09/2006 2:39:42 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I was thinking the exact same thing. Lying is not always a good political strategy as it is hard to keep all the lies straight, consistent and coherent.


72 posted on 09/09/2006 2:46:02 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tina07

Oh sure Harv...you were just a willing go along dupe for the role.
You took the job and got paid for your work no doubt.... Until some Dem hack got in your ear.
What a load of crap from a sanctimonious Hollyweirdster.


73 posted on 09/09/2006 2:50:12 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight
I agree with you, but after getting 'stomped on' so many times by the liberal Dems, it seems like Bush would strike back. I've been hoping he would speak out about the injustice done to Scooter Libbey, but I haven't heard him mention it. I believe the Dems perceive his reluctance to retaliate as weakness. I think he should speak out about their dirty tricks; if not for himself, for the people who are being hurt by their actions.
74 posted on 09/09/2006 2:54:56 PM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne
I think he should speak out about their dirty tricks; if not for himself, for the people who are being hurt by their actions.

Here is the conundrum: If Bush speaks out directly about their dirty tricks then he is percieved as being paranoid. Nixonian perhaps. If he holds his tongue and pretends that he isn't being attacked then he is percieved as being out of touch. It's a losing position either way.

Now, if Bush continues in the manner which he has been, with delegating subordinates to do the talking, a la Chaney, Rumsfeld, Rice, ect, then the President can take the high road in a dignified manner while negotiating all political issues thru the back rooms of the WH and Congress, as it should be.

The United States shouldn't be a gossip column of personality, which is what the liberals want to turn it into. I believe that Dubya is doing a fine job as POTUS, even if I disagree with some of his actions.

75 posted on 09/09/2006 3:24:23 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Moonlight
Although I don't agree with him on everything, I do support Bush and think he has done much good. Ironically, I started studying my Sunday School lesson for tomorrow, which is titled, PRODUCTIVE ANGER. Wouldn't you know the first verse of scripture for reference is Proverbs 16:32 which reads: "Better a patient man than a warrior, a man who controls his temper than one who takes a city." I think you have been proven correct!! Dang it. :~)
76 posted on 09/09/2006 3:40:23 PM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne
Proverbs 16:32 which reads: "Better a patient man than a warrior, a man who controls his temper than one who takes a city."

Salient point, and I thank you :)

Bush is a fighter but not a street fighter ... Clinton is a street fighter. There is a difference. A street fighter reacts to their immediate impulses without reasoning and without consideration of consequences, while a fighter considers reasoning and consequences first and then strikes in a rational and effective manner.

What a shame that an entire political party such as the Dems have reduced themselves to irrational street fighting

77 posted on 09/09/2006 4:30:44 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

I thought Monica was an Israeli agent. Now she is Taliban.


78 posted on 09/09/2006 7:54:35 PM PDT by sine_nomine (American is a great country: 20 million illegals can't be wrong. So build that wall, Mr. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson