Posted on 09/18/2006 5:59:09 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
"Nada Roudee, spokeswoman for the Islamic Council of NSW, says Cardinal Pell should look at world history."
------
The History of Jihad:
What is Jihad: The Arabic word Jihad is derived from the root word Jahada (struggle). Jihad has come to mean an offensive war to be waged by Muslims against all non-Muslims to convert them to Islam on the pain of death. Jihad is enjoined on all Muslims by the Quran.
This site brings you the history of the Islamic Jihad from a neutral and factual viewpoint.
Site Map
The Jihad against Arabs (622 to 634)
The Jihad against Zoroastrian Persians of Iran, Baluchistan and Afghanistan (634 to 651)
The Jihad against the Byzantine Christians (634 to 1453)
The Jihad against Christian Coptic Egyptians (640 to 655)
The Jihad against Christian Coptic Nubians - modern Sudanese (650)
The Jihad against pagan Berbers - North Africans (650 to 700)
The Jihad against Spaniards (711 to 730)
The Reconquista against Jihad in Spain (730 to 1492)
The Jihad against Franks - modern French (720 to 732)
The Jihad against Sicilians in Italy (812 to 940)
The Jihad against Chinese (751)
The Jihad against Turks (651 to 751)
The Jihad against Armenians and Georgians (1071 to 1920)
The Crusade against Jihad (1096 – 1291 ongoing)
The Jihad against Mongols (1260 to 1300)
The Jihad against Hindus of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (638 to 1857)
The Jihad against Indonesians and Malays (1450 to 1500)
The Jihad against Poland (1444 to 1699)
The Jihad against Rumania (1350 to 1699)
The Jihad against Russia (1500 to 1853)
The Jihad against Bulgaria (1350 to 1843)
The Jihad against Serbs, Croats and Albanians (1334 to 1920)
The Jihad against Greeks (1450 to 1853)
The Jihad against Albania (1332 - 1853)
The Jihad against Croatia (1389 to 1843)
The Jihad against Hungarians (1500 to 1683)
The Jihad against Austrians (1683)
Jihad in the Modern Age (20th and 21st Centuries)
The Jihad against Israelis (1948 – 2004 ongoing)
The Jihad against Americans (9/11/2001)
The Jihad against the British (1947 onwards)
The Jihad against the Germans (1945 onwards)
The Jihad against the Indians (1947 onwards)
The Jihad against the Filipinos in Mindanao(1970 onwards)
The Jihad against Indonesian Christians in Malaku and East Timor (1970 onwards)
The Jihad against Russians (1995 onwards)
The Jihad against Dutch and Belgians (2003 onwards)
The Jihad against Norwegians and Swedes (2003 onwards)
The Jihad against Thais (2003 onwards)
The Jihad against Nigerians (1965 onwards)
The Jihad against Canadians (2001 onwards)
The Jihad against Latin America (2003 onwards)
The Jihad against Australia (2002 onwards)
The Global Jihad today (2001 – ongoing)
The War on Terror against Jihad today (2001– ongoing)
The Vision for the post-Islamic (and post-religious) world
http://www.historyofjihad.org/
"Angers Muslims!
Who the hell cares?"
Semper Fi
My sentiments exactly.
LOLOLOLOLOL
"D--- it! This is a religious war and most will not say it!!"
The muslims have quite clearly said this.
When someone says they're going to wipe me off the face of the Earth, I tend to believe they intend to do so.
Thank you for posting this.
I've been advising folks for quite some time now to familiarize themselves with world history...it's repeating itself again.
Sole purpose...? To piss off the muzzie / Islamo crapheads.
Lot's of the right cartoons. Lot's of "Allah is so F***** up" jokes. Lot's of articles detailing specifically what that religion / cult has contributed to the cultural evolution of man.....
I volunteer for that last one.
tick...tick...
Ok, I'm done.
But we can have prizes - 100 points to the poster that starts a NEW jihad, etc, 75 points if we get a rise from the head Iran raghead, etc.
I've had enough of and heard enough from these a$$holes.
The Pope needs to come out and say, "sorry, just kidding about that apology stuff - you guys really are the idiots!"
I wish.
Australian newspapers are notorious for getting titles and honourifics wrong. The one that really annoys me is that Australian newspapers often refer to our last Chief of the Defence Force as 'Major-General Peter Cosgrove' - he's very popular and is quite often mentioned as a potential Governor-General so he's mentioned a fair bit.
He was a Major-General at the time he became well known in Australia - when he was given command of Australian troops in East Timor in 1999. But for some reason, Australian journalists couldn't seem to grasp that he stopped being a Major-General after that - he had two further promotions through Lieutenant-General to General - and the newspapers still constantly get it wrong. It's insulting that they don't take the care they should.
ping
lol!!
Indeed. What DOESN'T tick them off? It's become ho-hum.
I'm sure the ABC writer would have liked the Pope to say that but his phrasing wasn't quite that, was it?
"I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims," the pope said.
Give 'em Hell, Pell.
Anger for everyone...keep it comming.
If every religios christian leader soke out these boobs would start getting the message that all their ranting and dancing in the streets means ZILCH
Makes me wonder re: the Major-General - do the papers think that Major-General is a higher rank than 'just' General?
John Kerry. Nancy Pelosi. Al Gore. John McCain. John Warner, Ward Churchill. Howard Dean. Michael Moore. Cindy Sheehan . . . .
Thanks for the information. I appreciate it!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.