Skip to comments.
Prospecting for Oil? Look In an Asteroid Crater
space.com website ^
| 14 December 1999
| By Michael Paine
Posted on 10/07/2006 6:33:48 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
The idea that complex hydrocarbons (the main components of petroleum oil) are a natural part of the Earth's crust should come as no surprise to scientists who study comets and asteroids.
To: Fred Nerks
But it comes as a big surprise who have no scientific background.
This must mean that Saudi Arabia has had a lot of astroid hits.
2
posted on
10/07/2006 6:38:17 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Nihilism is at the heart of Islamic culture)
To: Fred Nerks
This makes the moon a LOT more interesting.
3
posted on
10/07/2006 6:40:39 PM PDT
by
gotribe
(It's not a religion.)
To: Fred Nerks
This theory is not new - it goes back many years- a Austrian Jewish scientist named Goldstone- I think,
came up with this hypothesis that Petroleum is not the result of decaying marine plants at all, but coincident to the creation of the earth itself .
A vast ocean of hydrocarbons deep inside the porous rock of the earth itself, deep in the mantle .
Even the great Russian scientist Mendeleev described Petrol as a a material in which organic remains were added - as it percolated up to the Earth's surface .
Microbes feed on this geo-hydrocarbon, in turn they die and their remains are added to the petroleum .
To: Fred Nerks
One of the leading sources of oil for this country is Lousisana and the Gulf just offshore from such. All of those deposits were laid down by the Mississippi after the Cretaceous impact. It is far more likely that the oil we produce from those formations is from organic deposits laid down from millions of years of fluvial deposition.
I am not averse to alternative theories of where petroleum comes from. But they need to do a better job than this.
5
posted on
10/07/2006 6:41:52 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Good fences make good neighbors)
To: Fred Nerks
Sounds like a bunch of hocus pocus.
6
posted on
10/07/2006 6:42:19 PM PDT
by
billybudd
To: Fred Nerks; All
Follow-up:
This same Goldstone, held that deep asteroid impacts fractured the Earth's crust allowing thie Geo-Petroleum to be pushed to the surface .
To: SunkenCiv
This calls for some kind of catastrophism ping, though Dr. Velikovsky thought BOTH the hydrocarbons and the craters had an extraterrestrial origin.
8
posted on
10/07/2006 6:44:37 PM PDT
by
Berosus
("There is no beauty like Jerusalem, no wealth like Rome, no depravity like Arabia."--the Talmud)
To: billybudd
Sounds like a bunch of hocus pocus.
There's an infinite amount of nonsense (eagerly lapped up by the majority of FR, it seems) regarding abiogenic petroleum.
This particular article at least gets points for not claiming the standard theory of oil is that it comes from dinosaurs.
9
posted on
10/07/2006 6:44:58 PM PDT
by
Strategerist
(Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
To: Fred Nerks
"Geoscientist" Okay, what is that?
I have worked in oil exploration for years and I have never heard of that term.
Geophysicist
Geologist
Petroleum engineer
Seismologist
10
posted on
10/07/2006 6:45:00 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: Fred Nerks
>>"Rock oil originates as tiny bodies of animals buried in the sediments which, under the influence of increased temperature and pressure acting during an unimaginably long period of time transform into rock oil" -- M.V. Lomonosov 1757AD.
Maybe it's time to change the textbooks.
<<
You mean '1857', don't you ? ? ? ?
To: Fred Nerks
I've read about more or less continuous "seeps" moving upward against caprock. Never had it discussed in association with meteors...
To: Fred Nerks
Considering how much of the earth has been affected by impacts it would impossible to prove this theory wrong. That is without (fill in the blanks) millions of dollars in research.
13
posted on
10/07/2006 6:47:19 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
(.)
To: Berosus
>>This calls for some kind of catastrophism ping, though Dr. Velikovsky thought BOTH the hydrocarbons and the craters had an extraterrestrial origin.<<
Dr. Velikovsky was the pariah of the scientific community !
Hell, Carl 'Spasmos' Sagan tried to have him academically lynched . .
To: dirtboy
I just wish that 'scientists' would admit that they have no idea where crude oil comes from or exactly how much there is on Earth.
It would be so refreshing.
L
15
posted on
10/07/2006 6:49:17 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(islam is not a religion. It's the new face of Fascism in our time. We ignore it at our peril.)
To: Lurker; Dog Gone
Petroleum geologists usually are less concerned about where oil comes from and instead tend to be much more concerned about determining whether oil will be present when their companies spend a couple million dollars to drill a well where they think the oil is going to be.
16
posted on
10/07/2006 6:51:33 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Good fences make good neighbors)
To: marc costanzo
Dr. Velikovsky was the pariah of the scientific community!
More like "embarassing joke" rather than "pariah" and it's rather difficult to describe him as a scientist or part of the scientific community.
17
posted on
10/07/2006 6:52:34 PM PDT
by
Strategerist
(Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
To: Fred Nerks
The abyssal, abiotic theory of oil production has been around for a long time. Pretty compelling.
18
posted on
10/07/2006 6:53:16 PM PDT
by
SuzyQue
(Remember to think.)
To: Lurker
I just wish that 'scientists' would admit that they have no idea where crude oil comes from
They have an excellent idea where it comes from - dead microscopic plankton (much of it diatoms and algae) laid down in oceans and large lakes and later buried.
The chemical composition of such organisms exactly matches that of petroleum in many instances.
19
posted on
10/07/2006 6:57:39 PM PDT
by
Strategerist
(Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
To: marc costanzo
This theory is not new - it goes back many years- a Austrian Jewish scientist named GoldstoneThomas Gold. The article mentions him.
20
posted on
10/07/2006 6:58:06 PM PDT
by
cynwoody
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson