Posted on 12/12/2006 3:09:54 PM PST by DogByte6RER
Note also that the Scottish National Party is one of those leftwing European parties that American neo-Confederates and palaeocons are so fond of.
I say independence for England! Let the rootless Anglo-Saxon diaspora have an ancestral motherland!
I want my hyphen!
Unfortunately for your position, that's all the relgions except the eastern ones and (ironically) the pre-islamic Iranian ones. Do you want to outlaw the belief of each religion that in the end it will be found to have been the correct one?
Funny how seculars insist on seeing Jews as symbols of tolerance and secularism. According to Torah, every human being born into the world is statutorily obligated by either the entire Torah (in the case of Jews) or the Seven Noachide Laws (in the case of non-Jews). In fact, when Mashiach comes he will finally bring this about. You want to arrest him?
People who think Judaism teaches the values of the "enlightenment" should read the Book of Joshua.
Do scotch muslims wear kilts?
That's an interesting point. However, white European leftwing movements like the SNP, the IRA, the SNLA, etc., are in a bit of a quandary. They all define their nationhood against something (in the case of the Celts, against England) and love to invoke all the mystical ancestral themes, but they also loudly condemn racism, any move to limit third world immigration, and trumpet their fraternal relations with third world leftist national liberation movements.
The Scottish National Liberation Army is a Maoist group that has threatened to run every "English" person out of Scotland (even though the Angles were in Scotland before the Scots were). I doubt they have a similar policy against any other "immigrant" group.
I think you may have misunderstood my point so allow me to state it more simply: We should be wary of intolerent groups who want to exterminate other groups based upon philosophical differences.
Or even "Live and let live, but if they try to kill us then we need to fight to the death."
WWWWD, What would Willam Wallace Do?
More than paint his face Blue and lift his Tartan to show his BUM I suspect.
WRONG, get a clue, Mr. Osama Saeed!!
The best contemporary comparisons to the Nazis all come out of the Moooooslim world, thank you.
Not all Muslims are Nazis, maybe, but almost all contemporary Nazis are Muslims.
Ooops, was that politically incorrect?
Or even "Live and let live, but if they try to kill us then we need to fight to the death."
Mmmmmmmmkay . . . just so long as that doesn't apply to Mashiach HaMelekh!
Hitler based a lot of his propaganda on the Islamic model.
Any assistance appreicated.
<< Osama Saeed compared the (so-called) "sustained barrage of verbal 'abuse'" being aimed at Muslims in Britain today to state-sponsored persecution of Jews in prewar Germany. >>
Notwithstanding this loathsome creature's analogy is a sick twisting of the facts of the matter and is utterly despicable, on second thoughts, we should be so lucky.
(For if ever there was a cancer upon the Earth that needed radical removal, islamanazism is surely it)
You're very confused, aren't you?
Mashiach HaMelekh is the long-prophesied Davidic King who will return all Jews to Israel, rebuild the Holy Temple, and impose the Kingdom of G-d over the entire earth. Does this sound like J*sus to you? If it does then you are very ignorant about chr*stianity, which insists that the messiah came 2000 years ago and that the "kingdom of G-d" is the church. And if this doesn't sound like chr*stianity to you, then I'm afraid you're only familiar with the "Bible chr*stianity" of the American Heartland, which isn't historical chr*stianity at all.
Have you ever considered the possibility that G-d just might be factual rather than an abstract concept clothed in quaint ethno-cultural mythology? The factual G-d isn't bound by the "enlightenment" or the First Amendment. Eventually He will triumph. As a matter of fact, in theory all humanity is already statutorily obligated to observe His laws, which include a ban on all false religions (which include islam and chr*stianity).
It's obvious from what you write and from the information on your home page that you know very little about Torah. Why else would you think Mashiach HaMelekh is J*sus?
Sure does, only it's:
not all Jews but, rather, Abraham's seed (Abraham believed God and it was counted to him as righteousness.) and they are being returned to God ... which they can do now because their sins have been forgiven.
the "Holy Temple" isn't a brick and mortar building .. and
He didn't impose the Kingdom of God (the most accurate translation of "Kingdom" is "Rule"), He proclaimed it and demonstrated it. Every knee will bow next time.
Biblical Christianity asserts that there is a glorified human being, the firstborn from the dead, sitting on the throne of God .. at the right hand of the Father (See Psalm 8)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.