Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recession clouds darken 2007 outlook
cnn ^ | 12-26-06 | Chris Isidore

Posted on 12/27/2006 6:46:17 AM PST by Hydroshock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Hydroshock
Dot.com IPO comeback? YouTube chose to sell out to Google instead of testing the public's appetite for social networking stocks. Other startups may also shun the IPO route

Small companies are growing but seeking money in places other than the stock market because of the onerous regulations of Sarbanes Oxley.

London and Hong Kong love SOX.

21 posted on 12/27/2006 7:12:00 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Merry Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

I'm suprised this wasn't written by Paul al-Krugman, he has prdicted 9 of the last 0 recessions.


22 posted on 12/27/2006 7:12:57 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Merry Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
But from what I am seeing, housing has hit bottom and things are slowly turning the other way. We will start to see more building and steady prices in the coming months and prices will actually start going up again by late summer.

Yeah. For a brief moment it looked like we might take a few first tentative steps toward controlling the Mexican border, but we're clearly back to an open borders policy. Housing has to boom in the long run, as we have another 40-60 million Mexicans to accommodate.

23 posted on 12/27/2006 7:14:02 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Dorothea Lange

“In the Bush economy, we can only dream about standing in soup lines.”

24 posted on 12/27/2006 7:16:27 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Happy Holidays from your "friends" at CNN! All gloom and doom, all the time!


25 posted on 12/27/2006 7:17:19 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (When I was a kid, "global warming" was known as "the weather.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Heavens no. Don't delete it. It's the annual "Stormy Weather Predicted for the New year" story. It's traditional.


26 posted on 12/27/2006 7:21:34 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
The economy will not turn down in 2007. The idiots in the Media quote the housing market as the reason for the projected downturn. But there have been many times when the housing market has caught up with demand and prices and sales of homes decline.

The so called logic behind that says a down turn in new homes and home sales will cause a down turn in furniture and appliance sales. Pundits believe that a down turn in housing sales will create a down turn in sales of construction and construction employment and that translates into recession.

That has not proven to be the case in other times. When home ownership reaches an all time high, as it is now, the owners of those homes start the process of remodeling and updating furniture and appliances. They redecorate and repair. New homes bought and furnished a few years ago need new carpeting, furniture and appliances. The predicted down turn in these industries never materializes.

Drive by a Home Depot or Lowes store and look at the number of cars in the parking lot. It will make my point.

Even low levels of inflation over a decade gives the home owner more disposable income to spend on other things. A house payment in 2000 may have taken 1/4 of the household income but today it will likely take no more than 18 percent.

For the most part their payments remain the same or they switch from variable rates to fixed rate mortgages. That tends to reduce their payments. But home payments as a percentave of income decrease over time. A home owner five years into a mortgage has mote money to spend on clothing, eating out, and other non necessities. They buy new cars, furnishing, and travel more.

The unemployment rate is very low. That means more people have money to spend. There are only two things one can do with money... spend it or save it. If it is saved then the savings institution loans it to someone who borrows to spend.

The argument that people will spend less on housing is interpreted to mean they will spend less on other things. That is just not true. When unemployment is low and wages are increasing, as is the current case, then people just spend their money on other things or save it.

And as I said earlier in this post, saving or investing just causes others to spend the saved or invested money.

Those who interpret a decline in housing dollars as a decline in the economy are not thinking clearly. It may very well cause an increase in unemployment in the construction industry, but that can only mean that employment will increase in other areas of the economy.

Follow the money. Unless you can show a decrease in the amount of disposable income, there will be no recession.

27 posted on 12/27/2006 7:24:20 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Actually this is the best news possible.

It's only when the MSM and therefor the convetional wisdom turns positive that we are headed for trouble, like in the late 1990's.

Let em spread doom and gloom it just means another awesome year.


28 posted on 12/27/2006 7:25:08 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Merry Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
This is, indeed, a goofy lefty story. The housing boom is over, they say, but it is not: it landed softly and has picked up, according to the latest stats unmarred by the desire to undermine confidence. What crap CNN is. Sheesh.
29 posted on 12/27/2006 7:36:31 AM PST by TheGeezer (I.will.never.vote.for.John.McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

When the MSM acknowleges that the economy WAS NOT "in a nosedive" or "the worst ever" or "teetering on the edge of a recession the last four years leading up to the election this year, then I will be inclined to debate the content of the CNN assertion on its merits.

Until then, life is too short to waste debating with stopped clocks like liberals and the MSM who are bound to be right twice a day, but who lack the accounability or the desire to be accountable for what they say.


30 posted on 12/27/2006 7:43:09 AM PST by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGeezer
"The economy is stumbling at the end of 2006"

Sales of new homes rose 3.4% in November which was better than expected. Online retail spending rose 26% over last year during the month of Dec. and energy prices are falling again. Yep, really stumbling...

31 posted on 12/27/2006 7:44:08 AM PST by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Ordinarily I don't pay any attention to anything CNN has to say about anthing. However, since it will be the Party in power who will get the blame for a new recession, this story may actually contain some objectivity.


32 posted on 12/27/2006 7:46:47 AM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

That confirms it, next year will be a very good one.


33 posted on 12/27/2006 8:18:09 AM PST by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Hmm...CNN isn't causing any panic today. The Dow is up 80, November home sales were up big and oil is down to $60 and change.


34 posted on 12/27/2006 8:21:02 AM PST by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Either CNN is smoking some really good crack, or they are warning us that the economy will crash after all the Dem tax increases.


35 posted on 12/27/2006 8:26:20 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
The are a whole lot of unknown variables out there right now, it is a time to be cautious.

Well one could make that statement at any point in time over the last 100 years.

36 posted on 12/27/2006 8:30:41 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
CNN? You're the first person in a long while whom I've seen post a CNN article NOT in jest.

Do you post stories from The Nation too?

37 posted on 12/27/2006 9:05:28 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson