Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dubai - US demand for fee not acceptable: DP World
Khaleej Times ^ | February 16, 2007

Posted on 02/16/2007 6:20:44 AM PST by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: cake_crumb
The public will trust our safety to a insurance firm with no experience?

That's not completely true. Regardless of who leases the terminals, security is provided by DHS, the Coast Guard, U.S. Customs, the NY Port Authority, and whatever locals want to be involved.

21 posted on 02/16/2007 7:55:07 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
"You dropped a few zeroes"

OOPS. Sorry. I can't seem to type OR proofread today :-(

22 posted on 02/16/2007 7:59:01 AM PST by cake_crumb (When "bipartisan study groups" prosecute wars, you get Another Viet Nam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
You missed the point. Popular table-talk soundbyting, specifically, "Do we trust our security to an ARAB COMPANY???!!??!?!?!", backed up by Chucky and Cheesey (Hillary) is what killed the DPW deal. The same agencies would still have been responsible for security, after all. An insurance firm is better in what way? No, the rat still stinks.
23 posted on 02/16/2007 8:05:41 AM PST by cake_crumb (When "bipartisan study groups" prosecute wars, you get Another Viet Nam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
I'm with you. Heritage released a report that, had DPW been allowed to lease the terminals, port security would have increased. It mattered not.
24 posted on 02/16/2007 8:08:02 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
"It mattered not."

Yep. It was all political, meant to hurt Bush. What it achieved was to highlight the ignorance and bigotry of most Americans and tick off a lot of people. What a way for the party that wants to run the country to win the hearts and minds of the Arab world....and they complain about theh president failing to win hearts and minds!

25 posted on 02/16/2007 8:19:20 AM PST by cake_crumb (When "bipartisan study groups" prosecute wars, you get Another Viet Nam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

No problem. Just trying to be accurate!


26 posted on 02/16/2007 8:36:11 AM PST by MortMan (Middle Age: When playing like a child makes you feel like an old man the next morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper

It was the unions who pushed this issue. They were afraid of losing control.


27 posted on 02/16/2007 8:38:20 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: twonie

The result is that the good folks in the UAE keep the ports.

Sounds ok to me


28 posted on 02/16/2007 8:41:11 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Want a stress free life? vote Republican..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bert

Sounds fine to me, too, and always did. There was a very vocal community here on FR that vigoriously opposed the DP World deal on what I called xenophobic grounds. You would have thought that bin Laden himself was buying the ports.

We trust the UAE enough to sell them the very latest F-16s. The UAE has continued to be a staunch ally of the US in the WOT, yet because they are an Arab Muslem country we couldn't trust them to unload ships?

Port security is controlled by Homeland Security and shipments are controlled by Customs. DP World would have been responsible for maintaining the docks and loading equipment, and hiring American Longshoremen to do it.


29 posted on 02/16/2007 9:42:22 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

....we couldn't trust them to unload ships? ......

There is a strong racial/religous bigotry against anything Arab coupled with the Don't Buy Anything Not American that shrouds many minds with a thick rind of irrational thought.

This is indeed a curious turn of events. It seems the Port Authority has prolonged their presence, perhaps till it is all forgotten. Strange!!


30 posted on 02/16/2007 12:54:20 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Want a stress free life? vote Republican..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson