Rasmussen: Giuliani 33% McCain 19% Gingrich 13% Romney 8%

Rasmussen Reports ^ | February 20, 2007 | Scott Rasmussen

[do the dhue]

I don't know what the big whoop to do is all about.

Professional Politicians pedaling pooh. Rudy may or may not take my gun away. Romney may or may not kill the unborn. I think McCain supports the war. Sometimes anyway. All a bunch of BS if you ask me.

I guess you can tell where they stand by the group of people that they are talking too. (Don't get me wrong, they are all better then the Commie left).

Anyway, Newt does not have his hat in the ring, so he shouldn't even count. I would vote for him over any of the others though. I want a Reagan. A good Conservative. I want someone who will tell you how it was from his heart and mind.

We need Michael Reagan. I am writing his name in ...

http://www.reagan.com/index.php

[WOSG]

"Character is part of leadership."

Absolutely agree. These days we gravitate to celebrity rather than character.

[Kevin J waldroup]

Fantasy poll

[ZULU]

The conservatives should get behind Hunter. He's the most conservative and has a good record. If he doesn't seem to be going anywhere, then it should be Gingrich.

Giuliani can't beat Hillery nationally. His record on social issues, will kill him in the Red States. The Republicans there won't vote for Hillery, but they don't have to. All they need to do is vote third party or stay home and she's in. And as in 2006, I suppose they will do just that.

[ZULU]

If Rudy gets nominated, the Dems will work through the media to make sure the conservative base beceoms aware of his record on guns, abortion, illegal aliens and prior history of supporting liberal Dems like Florio, Cuomo and Clinton, all of whom have political perspectives in conflict with those he presently claims to support.

Unless he can reposition himself sufficiently on these issues, he will losse the Red States and Hillery will win by default.

[The Coopster]

Which one? All of them?