Rasmussen: Giuliani 33% McCain 19% Gingrich 13% Romney 8%

Rasmussen Reports ^ | February 20, 2007 | Scott Rasmussen

[The Coopster]

And so far, his site is devoid of any real specifics. In fact, it even says "coming soon - our great ideas", or words to that effect.

They'd better get on it, or risk sounding like all of the other empty suit politicians out there.

[HitmanLV]

RUDY PING!

[Beagle8U]

"I did check to see, I looked in keyword Rudy and searched for Rasmussen, but found nothing."

Check the link I posted. Same title same source. I found it using the title you posted because I knew it was posted earlier.

[The Coopster]

Well, the other thread didn't have anything but childish keywords by apparent "true conservatives".

So when Ltd tried to do a legitimate search of keywords, nothing happened.

And people are contributing to this thread, as well. So who the heck cares?

[baubau]

"Real Clear Politics Average:

Why do we need RCP to calculate a simple arithmetic average?

Why are they even mentioned? RCP does not conduct any polls; it just adds the numbers and divides them by the n factor.

[Beagle8U]

I could care less but I think they are trying to cut down on duplicate posts of articles.

[George W. Bush]

FR's search engine and keywords remain weak. Some people don't use keywords or use them inconsistently.

Instead, try using Google with the 'site:' keyword.

Google search for: site:freerepublic.com Rasmussen: Giuliani 33%

Generally Google picks up FR threads within a day, sometimes just an hour or so.

[The Coopster]

Well thank you for volunteering to police the threads for everyone...

[The Coopster]

The point was that every other poll out there shows Guiliani leading.

And actually, a lot of folks look to RCP for a good overview of everything out there on both sides - as opposed to only sticking to sites that present things the way you want to see them, or the way others want you to see them.

RCP was used/quoted/followed a lot during the last two Presidential elections here on FR.

If nothing else, it's a real time saver versus looking each individual article up yourself.

Have you ever even been there? You might find it quite useful.

[familyop]

Heh...do we have some surprises for you! And remember how all of the big pollsters showed Kerry in the lead in 2004!

We'll nominate Newt or Duncan! If not, you'll get Hillary.

[ZULU]

Why the hell do they omit HUNTER from these polls???

[The Coopster]

What exactly do you mean by that?

[FreeAtlanta]

Too many Rino's and lying dims voting in the poll. Put in Obama, then see what the percentages are.

[streetpreacher]

The only story here is that one name is polling at third even though he has not announced or is actively campaigning for President. If people do not think Gingrinch is going to be a formidable force in this nomination, they are smoking something.

[streetpreacher]

Wouldn't McCain be more likely to steal votes from Rudy thereby helping a conservative?

[gondramB]

>>I'm still befuddled, yet satisfied, that Gingrich is outpolling Romney. Not satisfied with Giuliani or McCain, though.<<

The Fox survey we looked at yesterday had Romney at 8% last month but dropping to 3% this month. Interesting difference.

[streetpreacher]

I've had the same thoughts before. LOL. Either to help McCain or Romney.

[Joe Miner]

Where is Hunter in the polls?

I think I saw his name down near Alan Keyes'.

[gondramB]

>>The only story here is that one name is polling at third even though he has not announced or is actively campaigning for President. If people do not think Gingrinch is going to be a formidable force in this nomination, they are smoking something.<<

This is another interesting thing about the Fox survey was how Newt bounces from month to month while all the other have trends.

[The Coopster]

ROTFLMAO!