Posted on 04/24/2007 7:11:23 AM PDT by jveritas
Saddam was a menace to us, his own population and to the Israelis. That enough was justification to get rid of the scumbag.
bump
IIRC, the dems (via the IAEA) were worried that the information on the site was a “threat” to U.S. security—funny how they never bother about that when they decide to leak other classified info to the NY Slimes.
God bless for the great work you’ve done with these translations. It’s here for anyone to learn.
Thank you yet again.
They shut the website after the New York Times wrote an article about a complaint form the IAEA who said that there was a sensitive document about Saddam nuclear program published on the website and it should not have been published. The document was part of the 1996 FFCD (Full Complete and Final Disclosure) presented to the UN and IAEA by Iraq and details their nuclear program activity as well as other WMD programs. Any nation who is a member of the IAEA could have accessed this 1996 document in one way or another and they do not need to wait for the Pentagon to publish such a document 10 years after the fact.
Yep, we can always precidt the left wing lunatics will say.
Absolutely.
very witty.
Just doing my little duty.
Thats a good example of the difference between being a proactive fighter compared to the spineless politically correct rules of engagement extremist liberals. If President Bush caved to political pressure the results would of been catastrophic.
If this attack were to happen as a result of our political inaction liberals still never would of accepted responsiblity.
Dennis Miller said it best "Liberals always feel your pain. Unless of course, they caused it."
And doing it damn fine, too!
The Demagogues, the IAEA, and the NY Times worked in concert to create a little furor about a doc with nuclear related info that the IAEA suddenly claimed could help countries like Iran..... funny how no one in the servile leftist media seemed to notice that these clowns claim simultaneously that (1) Saddam’s regime was no threat at all, and (2) just ONE doc from the millions in the archives could be of value to the nuclear weapons programs of rogue states like Iran.
On the one hand, we are not supposed to pay attention to these docs because there’s nothing there (sic)...... OTOH, the website for the docs had to be shut down because of the grave sensitivity of these docs........ these ass-clowns can’t even keep their own propaganda story straight!
Thanks for the ping, thanks for the eye-opening work!
JV: you’re awesome!
jveritas,
two out in one day...PING
You do a service to your Nation.
Irish Mike
Wait a minute...there were no links between Saddam and terrorists, right???
Nothing to see here...move along...pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...
They might as well say “Attention we have hijacked the Islamic religion”
Don't they realize that this type of statement is going to make it harder winning over the hearts and minds of our enabling liberals that only believe in their agenda not God?
I guess it doesn't matter anyway because it appears they already have an unholy alliance as David Horowitz has suggested.
It especially shows Saddam’s regime was far from being secular...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1822644/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.