Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interstate Toll Roads Eyed
mysa.com ^ | 08/31/07 | Polly Ross Hughes

Posted on 08/31/2007 9:03:48 AM PDT by Froufrou

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: subterfuge

I completely agree...

Did you know the Golden Gate bridge was paid for decades agao. I think they cleared the debt in the 70s, but I’m not sure exactly when it happened. Since then they’ve continued to charge tolls. Those tolls far outstrip the maintenance costs.

You see, once a revenue stream, always a revenue stream!

That’s why I stand emphatically against toll roads. Enough is enough!


41 posted on 08/31/2007 1:20:28 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
42 posted on 08/31/2007 1:24:31 PM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Ben, did your grandfather or dad and mine have to pay tolls to get roads built? The answer in most cases is no. Even where those tolls were used, the roads have been paid off decades ago. That’s the whole point.

The federal government has the dollars. They don’t want to direct those dollars to where they should go, so they come to you and I once again and ask us to fork over still more money to pay for the roads.

If I asked you to give me ten dollars for a baseball bat and you gave me the money, wouldn’t you be bent out of shape if I declined to give it to you? What would you say if I told you I donated the money to a local charity and you would have to pay again if you wanted the bat? I’ll tell you what you’d say, you’d say the same thing I’m saying right now.

We’ve paid for it already. Now give us the infrastructure damn it!


43 posted on 08/31/2007 1:25:06 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
44 posted on 08/31/2007 1:27:09 PM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"ask us to fork over more"

Tax bills originate in the House. Oberstar is chair of the trans committee. He is seeking a 5 cent increase in the fed gas tax. That is a 27% increase.

Texas gets back about 88% of every gas tax dollar sent to DC.

45 posted on 08/31/2007 1:33:47 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Okay Ben, then your own state leaders are the ones who have been ratholing the transportation funds for other projects.

Do a little study. Find out how many millions or billions of dollars you’re talking about, and make life miserable for them until they stop it.

Tell as many people as you can and start a groundswell of citizens who simply aren’t going to take it anymore.

Good luck to you.


46 posted on 08/31/2007 1:40:10 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Privatize Privatize Privatize
47 posted on 08/31/2007 1:45:53 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Could you please explain why you want publicly owned infrastructure to become private property? A private individual can decide to close the road and build homes on it. They can also close the roads and sell them to the locals. Ben, you’re messing with fire here IMO.

If you look at the agenda of the U.N. as it relates to open spaces and highways, this isn’t all that far fetched.


48 posted on 08/31/2007 1:53:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
There you go again.

It doesn't become private property. It is a lease awarded to the highest bidder.

49 posted on 08/31/2007 2:22:39 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B4Ranch; B-Chan; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


50 posted on 08/31/2007 2:48:14 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Okay it’s a lease, but there you go again...

1. We’ve already been paying highway taxes for every year since those roads were new.
2. Now it’s time for them to be upgraded, and where’s the money
3. I expect construction fees to eat the funds, what I don’t expect is for there to be a middle-man sucking out some of those funds for profit.
4. Why would anyone want to lease land we already own, then pay that person more than we have to, to get the roads repaired?

This doesn’t make a lick of sense.

Just because Ronald Reagan like to privatize things, doesn’t make it right in all instances. We own the damn roads and have been paying funds for decades to keep them repaired and expanded. Where are those funds? What crooks stole them. Why are you and I expected to pay for it all over again? And why would I ever sign on to a plan that will not only force us to pay for it again, but will raise the price since a middle-man is going to be involved?

Just damn Ben. You couldn’t find a more expensive needless boondoggle to back if you spent your whole lifetime looking.


51 posted on 08/31/2007 3:08:16 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

I’d rather the states “buy back” federal grants to schools so we can end this nonsensical federal intrusion into education.


52 posted on 08/31/2007 3:10:23 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (Reunite Gondwanaland!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

Yes, they paid for them forty years ago.


53 posted on 08/31/2007 3:12:09 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve
"The simple fact is that taxpayers have already paid for those roadways. To ask taxpayers to pay for them twice is untenable unconscienceable."

Better.

54 posted on 08/31/2007 3:19:04 PM PDT by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
"where's the money"

CA has the highest gas taxes in the nation. Where's the money?

55 posted on 08/31/2007 3:22:00 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: orchid
However, if you look at the federal budget for roads and infrastructure, you will see that a large percentage goes to other things like parks, bike trails and other non-qualifying (IMHO) projects.

And my question is, just where in the constitution does it grant congress the power to spend federal taxes on projects such as that? I have looked in vain.

56 posted on 08/31/2007 3:24:36 PM PDT by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

“I would be in favor of it if it were applied to new freeways, not ones already paid for by the taxpayers.”

Maybe you Californicators will fall for this dog and pony show, but Texans are getting sick of this stuff.


57 posted on 08/31/2007 3:31:30 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

“Over the last 30 years my gas taxes have been reduced by two thirds.”

Well they usually cut bicycle riders some slack on their gas taxes.


58 posted on 08/31/2007 3:35:40 PM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

I believe it is very telling that we are discussing this.

What does that tell us?


59 posted on 08/31/2007 3:37:52 PM PDT by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
BOO and SHAME on toll roads. The government now takes 30% of my income. Roads and infrastructure is one of the VALID expenditures of my tax dollars, but now they'd like my tax dollars and MORE in the form of FEES when I use the products!!! It seems that even some oddly thinking Pubbies are now saying we citizens should be charged me per service... Are you going to cease and desist with all the current Across-the-Board transportation taxes then? No, I thought not.

The airline industry is a horror after 9-11 and all the restrictions, let's take more joy out of traveling on roads too, shall we? /sarcasm

60 posted on 08/31/2007 3:59:35 PM PDT by Libertina (If God asks only for 10%, why should the government get more?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson