Posted on 10/01/2007 8:02:45 PM PDT by doug from upland
“I MADE IT BACK ALIVE!”
Doug,
You have my everlasting thanks for your ongoing efforts. Still, I hope you have guards and I hope you have duplicates of all those materials in one or two other places that you didn’t disclose to the FBI guy. I don’t trust the DOJ with all the Klintoon moles buried in it. I doubt if you do either.
Sleep tight, you earned it all.
Gary
Rembrandt said it better than I could and before I did, so I'm repeating it in big bold letters for emphasis!
Either way, Kudos, Doug!
You have such a way with words... : )
Excellent report my FRiend, I will be more than happy to show New York Hillary in any way shape or form you present her... They will love it here.
Can you help with a venue for a showing of the documentary in New York in late October?
Thanks, Doug, great job! Now I can go to bed.
Local Democrats in West fear impact of unpopular ticket leader
(NY’s junior senator)
LA Times | September 30, 2007 | Noam N. Levey
Posted on 10/01/2007 8:03:09 PM PDT by neverdem
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1905201/posts
BTTT
I am also pinging other NYers
What do we need?
I will try and get some other freepers to help.
It will be the final weeks of my campaign. I am running for election this year November.
Is it internet or do we need a studio?
People who oppose the klintons have a way of committing suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head or taking the wrong medicine.
Now, what could be the reason for not taping those interviews? It can't possibly be due to budget constraints. Rather, it's evident that it must be intentional. It certainly gives the FBI a great deal of power to modulate "the truth" as they see fit. That power would be diluted if they were forced to record and accurately report everything that happened or was said by any party in an interview. (Although they certainly have the technology available to selectively edit audio or video tapes, it is difficult and time consuming to hide the traces of such editing and maintain convincing continuity in a recording, whereas putting words into the mouths of interviewees takes a mere flick of the wrist of an agent's writing hand when written summaries are all that exists of the actual interview).
As we saw in the Scooter Libby trial, that practice of the FBI opens the door to a great deal of mischief by the authorities, if they have the desire. They unquestionably have the opportunity. In the Libby trial, the original FBI notes were somehow conveniently "lost", and instead, a summary of the original notes, apparently written by and/or testified to by some FBI agent other than the one(s) who actually conducted the interview, was presented to the Grand Jury and also entered into evidence at the Libby "trial".
Taken together, those tidbits provide frightening evidence that the FBI's investigatory processes can be corrupted, whether by powerful actors behind the scenes, or by agents themselves, to advance some agenda other than the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
I'm not a conspiracy buff, but you don't have to be one at all to recognize the odor...
Great Job, doug.
BTW, are you still receiving e-mail messages from Hillary’s campaign or have they finally figured out who you are?
Brass balls my man. I PRAY this works out for the best. Thank You.
History in the making. bmflr.
If you have an audience with an official of the FBI, it is my belief that they must make a file to contain everything that transpired - and also I think they record every word.
I believe it is followed up by people up the ladder - i.e. they cannot just shove it in a drawer and forget about it. It must be followed through for verification, and then a more precise investigation will follow.
Good job, sir.
Ping.
DFU, are you sure you’re not Arlo Guthrie in disguise? This reminds me a lot of his old story.
“You can get anything you want at DFU’s restaurant.”
Do you have anything official that proves you were at the FBI LA Office?
I ask because of this:
He didn't have a badge, so I asked his name. He wouldn't give it to me. He said he was just taking a preliminary report and, if my information was of value, he would pass it onto a team to investigate it.
If I recall, there was a USSC case that determined that it is required that they provide identification if asked, except in limited, classified, circumstance. It does not appear that is the case here, as you approached them.
Hence my question -- if nothing happens and you press it, they can say you were never there.
Great job, both of them, and good luck for the future followup.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.