Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Reilly: Hillary Is a Lock for Party Nod
Newsmax ^ | Monday, November 19, 2007 12:00 PM | Newsmax Staff

Posted on 11/19/2007 2:01:17 PM PST by bill1952

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Mariner

I think back to GW Bush’s campaign in ‘88.

He had a “fire break” strategy. If he lost Iowa and NH, he had plans to do extremely well in the South on Super Tuesday. In terms of delegates, that would have off-set the Iowa and NH losses.

He did lose Iowa as I think the campaign was expecting to - but did win Iowa as Bob Dole’s campaign fizzled out.

It would have been interesting to see what would have happened had GW Bush lost in New Hampshire.


21 posted on 11/19/2007 3:04:14 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Or shall it be stated that.....

"900 FBI files persuade democrat party leadership to give Hillary Clinton the party's nomination"

22 posted on 11/19/2007 3:14:33 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Obviously you have NOT read the Iowa polls. Millions of Dems are deserting Hillery in droves for Obammer. It really started two weeks ago with " Failure to tip," and was warmed up months ago by " Hsu's on first!"

When this was folowed by planted questions, flip flopping durng debate, and BJs accusation of bullying by boys, Dems started pulling up their tent pegs and decamping in droves.

Hillery is done.

23 posted on 11/19/2007 3:38:28 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger

Exactly Digger, but what are you gonna do?

Rudy will trash don’t ask, don’t tell in the military, curtail firearms rights and support abortion on demand.

Hillary will do the same with a tax increase and Nationalized healthcare.

Either way, what are Conservatives supposed to be excited about in a Rudy campaign?


24 posted on 11/19/2007 3:52:08 PM PST by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Isaiah 3.3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Hillary is a shoo in.
She will be the next democrat nominee for POTUS unless she dies.

Bet on it and bet large. I would, but there are no serious takers around me.


25 posted on 11/19/2007 4:01:35 PM PST by bill1952 ("all that we do is done with an eye towards something else." - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Your exposure of Hillary's campaign funding scandal with Peter Paul, Stan Lee and his supporting cast has been relegated to the archives of Clinton scandals, keeping company with the Paws, the Swiftboat Vets and POWs for Truth, Pardongate, Bimbo Eruptions and more than can be listed here without suffering cramping.

O'Reilly plays it safe to protect his ratings......and jumps on a fact after the fact.

Ain't it Rich?
26 posted on 11/19/2007 4:23:21 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

It won’t be in the archives for long. She is going to be under oath, and the case will be heard in 2008.


27 posted on 11/19/2007 5:23:57 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
If Hillery is THE dem nominee, as you are betting, it means all the other Dem candidates have rolled over for her. My Irish Setter could beat her in a debate, and he usually has his tongue out and his leg cocked.

Hillery has this image of invinceability. It truth she is a wind sock with so many holes in it she can't even figure which way the wind is blowing from. Thats why she flip flops when asked a simple question.

And that flip flopping means she is NOT a leader. Her policies will depend on one thing, what she percieves to be a right answer at that particular time, telling everyone what she thinks people want to hear. That means she will have no consistent policies if elected to office, at least none the public will know about. She is one dangerous poofter politician.

And I believe that the Dems have finally figured her out, and are leaving her in droves.

Obammer needs to slam her.

Go Obammer the Hammer!

LOL.

28 posted on 11/19/2007 7:31:48 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
She will be the next democrat nominee for POTUS unless she dies.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If she died, that will be the only time she would earn my vote.

29 posted on 11/19/2007 7:33:57 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
She is going to be under oath, and the case will be heard in 2008.

Maybe she'll make in on the No Spin Zone after all.....the mental image of Hillary testifying is 'Deja Vu all over again'.


30 posted on 11/19/2007 7:35:34 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Heh. Bet anyone foolish enough to put up money that she wins the nomination on Super Tuesday in a landslide.

- and I’d vote for her too if she was dead. 8^)


31 posted on 11/19/2007 7:37:37 PM PST by bill1952 ("all that we do is done with an eye towards something else." - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

“And what’s nuts...is none of her rivals have really harped on it........”

Because they’ll harp on her only on the inconsequential things... They don’t really want to see her lose to a Republican, so won’t do anything to weaken her general election prospects. The first one to do so (Edwards, probably) will find out what Hillary’s really like when she’s not pretending to be semi-friendly.


32 posted on 11/19/2007 9:37:00 PM PST by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Didn’t Missouri have a dead person win an election...a few years ago?


33 posted on 11/20/2007 6:24:11 AM PST by Osage Orange (molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

If I remember correctly, yes. - and the spouse was somehow subsituted for the dead man.

Modern elections, Soviet style...


34 posted on 11/20/2007 7:18:21 AM PST by bill1952 ("all that we do is done with an eye towards something else." - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson