Paul expects over $12M in 4th quarter

AP ^ | 02 Dec 2007 | Hope Yen

[MinnesotaLibertarian]

Actually, you didn’t say “most”. You said 5 of the first 6 were banned, which statistically is most of that subset, but you never used the word “most”. Furthermore, you don’t know the entire ping list, so you don’t know the percentage that are banned. My only point was that there are still a number of us left here, perhaps even a majority. I likewise don’t have the whole list, so I can’t be sure, which is why I avoided making any strong claims.

[jrooney]

You said I was lying. Obviously you were wrong.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

In a little over six weeks we in South Carolina get to send him packing. Leftists love him.

[MinnesotaLibertarian]

I was using the plural you, as in “you guys”, as in the Paul-bashers. By “refute your lies”, I meant defending Dr. Paul from baseless accusations that he’s going to run third party, that he’s getting his money from Soros, that he’s anti-American, etc. that are so common on these threads.

[jrooney]

I have never posted Paul would run third party. You like to claim others are smearing Paul, well you attempted to smear me. Learn how to read.

It is no wonder very few take Paul seriously or his goofy supporters. And yes, there is a high ban rate amongst Paul supporters here on FR. Most do not like him here including FR management.

[FreeInWV]

I almost forgot to ping you. It went in on Sunday. You are part of the Revolution!

Thanks for all your support!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1933704/posts?page=47#47

[Do Be]

To: incindiary YOU ARE NOT WANTED HERE! HAVEN’T YOU GOT THAT YET?

I was just sort of drifting through this thread when I ran into your post. Its ugly crudeness stopped me cold.

One of the attractive things about Paul is the ranting expressed on Free Republic against him. In fact, it was just such rabid ranting that made me take a look at him.

He makes a great deal more sense than you do.

Though many are opposed to his 'foreign policy' stance, it's hard not to immediately recognize that he has and lives integrity.

I suspect this is a word you will need to look up.

You talk to us about language? Open your ears you fool, and listen to what Ron Paul has engaged in. Denigration of the military, spouting in sane solutions for this Country’s problems. Your fight is not with me fool! Look to your own candidate and go somewhere where fools like you think Ron Paul is just brilliant...ain’t here!

Your style exhibits the characteristics of someone poorly educated whose emotions often get in the way of what they are trying to express, though it is also possible English is not your native tongue. Whichever the case, perhaps you could better support your ideas by sitting quietly in the corner.

I know my comments are not needed here. Incindiary does know the English language and expresses himself well, such as when he said, "Paul definitely does not fit with the big government, constitution-trampling, open-borders, sovereignty-eroding, socialist-lite *new* Republican party that so many here are cheerleaders for."

Rather than attacking 'incindiary' with what sounds like spittle, you might pause, take a breath and try to hear what he is saying to you.

The most attractive ticket would be Thompson/Paul. Together they would be unbeatable, unstoppable, a thing of beauty and one of the best things that has happened to this country since Reagan.

[incindiary]

Thanks Do Be. I appreciate your kind words. And I feel the same way about the rabid ranting. It's ok if people disagree, I'm all for a good debate, with someone who can communicate in an intelligent and civilized way. But the nasty, ugly and childish attacks or rantings are another matter. I don't think they realize how it just reflects badly on them, and has caused people to take a look and end up supporting Dr. Paul.

Btw, I'm a she not a he. :-]