Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS (Hillary did not have security clearance; Monica Lewinsky did)
David Hackworth website ^ | orig. 1998 | Hackworth

Posted on 12/30/2007 10:01:38 PM PST by doug from upland

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2007 10:01:40 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

David Hackworth, RIP.


2 posted on 12/30/2007 10:05:45 PM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Man....
THAT really blows!!!


3 posted on 12/30/2007 10:07:23 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEMOCRAT-You'll look great in a Burka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

ping.


4 posted on 12/30/2007 10:08:06 PM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
This, I do find credible.

Hillary did not have a need to know. (And she would have actively worked it, if she did.)

Monica, had a security clearance, as required, by her job.

Monica should be leading the Zogby Poll for which dem is best able to run this country.

5 posted on 12/30/2007 10:12:08 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Lewinsky was awarded one of the Pentagon's highest security clearances even though she was considered by White House insiders to be a flake with poor work habits.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Shows you that oral skills are highly valued in any Clinton presidency. It will be the same should Hillery get elected to the office.

I wonder if Hillery smokes cigars?

6 posted on 12/30/2007 10:12:45 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
It is my opinion that the media overrates the acquisition of a Top Secret security clearance. It is also my observation that security clearances are easy to get, but harder to keep and maintain.

Having said that, I would love to work in the White House some day. Unfortunately, I do not qualify. At least, not as a soldier. But there is a very good chance some day soon I will be working in a building somewhat near the White House.

7 posted on 12/30/2007 10:14:53 PM PST by tlj18 (Mike Huckabee is nonsense on stilts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
I wonder if Hillery smokes cigars?

Huma would know. I am sure Hillary and Huma have smoked together.

8 posted on 12/30/2007 10:15:18 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Monica’s lips weren’t too tight. They leaked onto her blue dress.


9 posted on 12/30/2007 10:15:23 PM PST by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I secretly hope for a Hillary victory in the primaries so that all this stuff (and more) can get re-opened in the general election.

It is time - past due in fact - to take the two Clintons out of the US's political future.

10 posted on 12/30/2007 10:16:04 PM PST by llevrok ( "In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom. In water, there is bacteria." - Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Generally, security clearances are granted to individuals because of the information they may come across. A security clearance doesn’t entitle someone to review classified information.

It would seem to me that a First-lady would require a security clearance.


11 posted on 12/30/2007 10:19:26 PM PST by Perdogg (Fred Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Is that Monica Lewinsky now or then?

One word: ew


12 posted on 12/30/2007 10:19:45 PM PST by wastedyears (Merry Christmas, FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Hey, Monica turns 35 this July so she’s legal to run. If their convention is brokered they can pick the one Bill did rather than the one he married.


13 posted on 12/30/2007 10:20:36 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

I’m not sure when that was taken.


14 posted on 12/30/2007 10:20:37 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

I thought it was Britney.


15 posted on 12/30/2007 10:22:07 PM PST by SIDENET (Hubba Hubba...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Could Hillary’s lack of a security clearance have something to do with the Black Panthers?


16 posted on 12/30/2007 10:22:12 PM PST by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

17 posted on 12/30/2007 10:26:40 PM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Why do I get the feeling that Miss Monica is not the only "bimbo" to receive instant security clearance.

This whole country was being compromised during an entire administration while the media was focusing on tabloid sales interests.

Hold on to your seat belts. This ride ain't over yet.

.

18 posted on 12/30/2007 10:27:28 PM PST by R_Kangel (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
All her dirty laundry was left in the basket.Given the importance of the blue dress, that line was just BRILLIANT.

Is that photo of Monica today? Has she straightened out her life?

19 posted on 12/30/2007 10:28:56 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (I do not want people to be agreeable, as it saves me the trouble of liking them. Jane Austen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Hey, she shilled for Jenny Craig. The only diet plan that allows you to...wait for it...eat the President!!

Have the veal, it’s great! I’ll be here all week!


20 posted on 12/30/2007 10:31:04 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson