Posted on 12/31/2007 5:34:36 AM PST by RDTF
My guess is the cells spend their time living a comfortable life at someone else’s expense and talking about ‘that day’ when they will attack the satan that is the US. All the while hoping and praying the orders never come!
I am more confident though that their leadership realizes there are plenty of fish to fry around the world in furthering their cause and they really don’t gain anything by poking us in the eye here in our homeland.
Every day, week, month, year that goes without a significant attack against us here at home more Americans drift back to sleep.
Remember, one of the would-be 9/11 attackers backed out before the operation, walked into an FBI office and spilled the beans about the whole plan. His intelligence never went any farther than that office. Had it been passed up the ladder there’s a chance it would have gotten attached of the seemingly unrelated intelligence about people taking flying lessons all over the US but not wanting to learn how to take off or land, just navigate.
Thanks,
I really needed that reminder.
The ballless bastards of the msm made sure that the US would withdraw from vietnam and the demonRATs left our allies without funds so that they would be slaughtered in record numbers.
Just demonRATs being demonRATs.
They’ll need nukes or some heavy duty bio/chem weapons.
Worse, they will take out thousands of their fellow muzzies, and earn the permanent enmity of the people they say they want to free.
I think this is wishful thinking by the boomers running the Chronicle, and a hope shared by journalists the world over.
Of course they will, just like the Gore Offensive and then the Kerry Offensive. Fortunately, we fought back and won.
LOL, I love that quote.
I agree with you completely.
Wars are fought on both strategic and psychological battlefields, and I believe the latter has been secured for our side. Notice that in Iraq, the number of suicide attacks dwindled while the number of remote detonations increased, an indication that the Arab Street had begun to see Iraq as a lost cause some time ago. The attack in Pakistan on Bhutto is instructive. It appears as if the jihad has to sit back and decide how to do the most damage with ONE suicide bomber, because willing martyrs are difficult to find now.
There has been no attack on US soil for five years now, not because we have somehow interdicted the enemy's capabilities, but because the last attack ended up blowing up in their face; there is a lack of will to strike now in the enemy camp, IMHO, because of the consequences since 9-11 that have accrued to the entire Middle East.
We should be vigilant, as you say, but this war will not end with any formal treaty or surrender, we must thus recognize what we are doing right. I see no Tet, I'm watching now for signs that our enemy is capitulating.
Good one!
And if Walter Cronkite and his fellow news mongers had acted like loyal Americans at that point, the communists would never have taken South Vietnam.
“The purpose of the (Tet) operations, which were unprecedented in their magnitude and ferocity, was to strike military and civilian command and control centers throughout the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam) and to spark a general uprising among the population that would then topple the Saigon government, thus ending the war in a single blow.”
The only two places where there is any chance of a Muslim popular uprising are in the tiny enclaves of Pakistan where they already rule. Such uprisings would be against the central government and the military and are already happening to some extent.
The other place would be Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood might attempt another coup against the government.
However, if you lose the Tet analogy, there are still many major attacks al-Qaeda could carry out. But they would be self limiting.
Their biggest chance for success are with bombings. Even a small functional terrorist cell could on its own carry out a large single, or multiple bombings. Bombings also have the least risk among terrorist actions.
Second are targeted assassinations of leaders. Again, this limits the exposure of the organization to just the assassin and his handler.
Third is industrial sabotage resulting in disaster. This is very effective, but less appealing to terrorists unless an explosion is involved. Technical expertise is required, but may not have to be in the same country.
But none of this is likely to cause a popular uprising, the changing of a government, or even the loss of command and control.
OBL is dead. Confirmed by Bhutto in an interview with David Frost.
Such attacks are relatively easy to coordinate and pull off.
On the other hand they want a Dem for President so they may well hold off until after the elections. Why waste assets when the citizens are doing the job for you?
Wasn't it a proud day in US history when the hostages were taken and the peanut man did nothing for 400 days? Instead of carpet bombing the bastids, we get dead Delta forces burning in the desert? Maybe Murtha could get Sec of Defense.
With all due respect, I've tried many times to track this down with factual certainty, but to no avail.
Giap has written many books (aka, tracts), but I've yet to find this "autobiography". No one telling the above story has ever included the actual title of the book where the assertion is made. The assertion is never put forward in actual quotations from the "autobiography", but as a summary of his comments.
The best I've ever found is that the story actually comes from Col. Bui Tinh, a top officer from the NVA who is actually much more colorful than Giap. Long-expatriated to France, he is said to have told the story in question while being interviewed on French radio or TV. Col. Bui DOES have an autobiography of sorts, but the story isn't there either (I've read the book).
Not trying to dispute the story itself, but to get the facts of the attribution. There's nothing factual tying this statement to Giap, more pointing to Bui, but (so far as I've found) nothing that proves it with 100 percent certainty. It's a bit of an urban myth.
I have bookmarked a site that tracks the American casualties in Iraq on a month to month basis and separates deaths from hostile and non-hostile causes.
This is a very informative site! I have watched its reports for over two years now. The figures for December ‘07 are wonderful! Granted, the death of even a single fighting person is too much and to be greatly mourned, the total for Dec. has been 21, or an average of .71 per day. This daily average compares to 4.23 per day in May of ‘07. It’s the first time it’s ever been less than one a day. Of the 21, eight were listed as non-hostile!
My Mom used to say “Nothing succeeds like success!” and I believe that’s going to be doubly true in Iraq. These people have NEVER had the opportunity for anything that approaches a normal like as we know it. The more they settle down and get to know life as it should be the less inclined I think they will be to turn back the progress. It’s like the old western movies where the town had been run by the bad guy so long that no one remembered what life was like before that. Then one good guy rides in, helps kick out the bad guy and then the town is ready to stand on its own again. Iraq is much more complicated than that, but the principle is the same.
God bless America and our fighting men and women!
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/episodes/11/interviews/giap/
In the book that I read, Gen. Giap was much more definite about the role of the American MSM than he is in this piece. I will continue to search.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.