Inside the hush-hush North American Union confab

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | March 13, 2008 | Jerome R. Corsi

[1rudeboy]

Get a grip. Jerome Corsi and World NetDaily have been trying to defend America and prevent our elected officials from ceding our national sovereignty to a world order by consistently providing detailed information.

So detailed that. if it wasn't for Corsi, we wouldn't know of Bush's secret plan to dissolve the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Does that give you any indication at all why some people are sceptical of Corsi?

[Calpernia]

I don't agree with all that Jerome Corsi writes. But if it is the NAU school of thought you disagree with, then you obviously ignored my posts.

I already know you saw the Resolution(one I called bill) post because you commented to me on it.

[1rudeboy]

I don't disagree with the "NAU school of thought" at all, it's a tradition in U.S. politics (and I don't mean that in a bad way, either).

The distinction I'm making, and I'll make it by observing that, Duncan Hunter is not stupid enough to claim that Bush has a secret plan to dissolve the United States, nor does he believe his supporters would fall for it.

[Calpernia]

That was what I wasn’t clear on with you. I didn’t know if you doubted the NAU theory or if you were just questioning Jerome Corsi’s reporting.

I’ve my own set of FOIA docs I’ve acquired and I don’t always come to the same conclusion as Jerome Corsi; but he has come up with much information I’ve not had. So I cherry pick his work.

[1rudeboy]

It goes back to my “Corsi is a yellow journalist” comments. Duncan Hunter is not yellow anything. Misguided in some matters, but by no means a threat to the Republic.

[Calpernia]

Understood. Thanks.

[1rudeboy]

One thing that bothers me is that Corsi is a poli sci professor . . . he should understand that his more outrageous comments call his other (more reasonable) work into question.

That's why I think it's simply to create "buzz." Think about it, it's no longer important to discuss what was actually said at the conference (and apply it to his hypothesis), just claim the cloud of "secrecy" is evidence enough. If that's not yellow journalism, nothing is.

"Secrecy" = "conspiracy" = "buzz" = $. Otherwise, this article would read like a book report.

[Mr. Silverback]

And once again, the accusation of treasonous intent.

I could be 100% in agreement with you on everything in the world, and I still wouldn’t want to converse with you because you’re being a putz. Go soak your head.

[Mr. Silverback]

You made the accusation against Robinson. Pointing the finger at me isn’t going to change it.

[Mr. Silverback]

Sorry, I didn’t mean you when I said that, I was talking about some of the other NAU-issue guys who were acting like jerks before you ever got here. I certainly should have been more clear.

Thanks for the classy response and have a great day.

[Designer]

"..have a great day."

Back atcha!

[Man50D]

You made the accusation against Robinson. Pointing the finger at me isn’t going to change it.

You make unsubstianted accusations against WND. Pointing the finger at anyone who questions the motives of those who are so willing to dismiss and bury a clear and present danger doesn't change that fact.

[Calpernia]

>>>...clear and present danger...

Excellent book!

;)

[Man50D]

So detailed that. if it wasn't for Corsi, we wouldn't know of Bush's secret plan to dissolve the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Does that give you any indication at all why some people are sceptical of Corsi?

Once again you make a poor attempt to obfuscate a point. My post #319 clearly referred to anyone who takes a dissenting view point is considered unpatriotic from those who choose to ignore the advancement of the NAU/SPP and prefer bury their heads in the sand.

BTW. Are you still working on those specific sources that refute WND and support your meaningless yellow journalism claim?

[1rudeboy]

What’s the problem with the selection of mine you posted in your last reply? If it doesn’t prove yellow journalism, what does it prove?

[1rudeboy]

In any case, try here. It was the benign version of Corsi's WND submission. Even then, it wasn't enough to keep Human Events from giving him the boot.

[Man50D]

What’s the problem with the selection of mine you posted in your last reply? If it doesn’t prove yellow journalism, what does it prove?

A simple word search will find multiple articles about replacing the U.S with the NAU but you obviously either haven't bothered to look or have and refuse to admit their existence. You still refuse to answer my question. Where are your sources?

[1rudeboy]

Here is a Human Events article that takes Corsi to task for his more egregious (and yellow) comments, with four quotes (and links). Read them and weep for your hero.

[Mr. Silverback]

You make unsubstianted accusations against WND.

Where?

[1rudeboy]

I’ve accused WND of sensationalizing stuff, and that is certainly not unsubstantiated . . . I don’t see the purpose in claiming it does not, frankly.