Skip to comments.
A Shameful, Ugly Ad
New York Times ^
| April 26, 2008
| Staff
Posted on 04/26/2008 4:46:35 AM PDT by freerepublic_or_die
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: freerepublic_or_die
Now he needs to get his party to listen. Or else, I suppose...
41
posted on
04/26/2008 5:09:42 AM PDT
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
To: Vision
I e-mailed the AL GOP and told them to get McCain in line or they could expect him to blow the Presidential Election with his holier than thou attitude.
42
posted on
04/26/2008 5:10:14 AM PDT
by
mtnwmn
(mtnwmn)
To: peggybac
The NY Times slamming a conservative ad? The shock! A first:-()
04-26-2008
43
posted on
04/26/2008 5:10:15 AM PDT
by
geo40xyz
(McCain, Obama or Hillarybeast possibility of 4 Supreme Court Justices, Gore @UN. The WINNER is?)
To: geo40xyz
A shameful, ugly editorial staff.
44
posted on
04/26/2008 5:10:52 AM PDT
by
MitchellC
(Thomas Sowell: 'I will be delighted.. if someone with such views gets elected.' ArmorforCongress.com)
To: chopperman
I thought that was one of his milder statments.
I’m still chuckling over the the whole “judaism is a gutter religion...” and Jesus was a poor oppressed black man struggling under white oppression.
The Rev. waves his bible, but seems to have missed the fact Jesus was a jewish rabbi.
Not sure why the jews haven’t done more to take on this freak’s ant-semitism.
To: Earthdweller
Very good point. Only the effete, elitist, metrosexual NYT would never get it.
46
posted on
04/26/2008 5:11:43 AM PDT
by
tgusa
(Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .....)
To: freerepublic_or_die
"Manipulative. Shameful. Race-baiting." Awwwwwwwww. Poor babies. How about a rousing chorus of "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it." Or how about something like, "We may disagree, but the First Amendment guarantees that people may freely express their opinions."
47
posted on
04/26/2008 5:12:26 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
((Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!))
To: Vision
“Senator McCain, please explain to everyone how the ad is racist.”
Senator McCain, please STHU!
To: mtnwmn
Very good. I don’t know how a genuine war hero could manage to blow the election, but McCain is desperately searching for a way.
49
posted on
04/26/2008 5:13:38 AM PDT
by
tgusa
(Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger .....)
To: freerepublic_or_die
I guess this would be the “newspaper” that ran the Betray Us ad? Mmmmkay.
To: tgusa
Two for the price of one, both fit the mold:-()
51
posted on
04/26/2008 5:16:37 AM PDT
by
geo40xyz
(McCain, Obama or Hillarybeast possibility of 4 Supreme Court Justices, Gore @UN. The WINNER is?)
To: tgusa
Someone needs to call the times out for calling the ad 'ugly'. Do they think Blacks are ugly? Who the heck is the race baiter here?
These slime suckers make their living off race and all manner of division.
52
posted on
04/26/2008 5:17:14 AM PDT
by
Earthdweller
(All reality is based on faith in something.)
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
To: freerepublic_or_die
54
posted on
04/26/2008 5:21:11 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: freerepublic_or_die
The Times is such a p.o.s.
Sure am glad they are laying off a whole passel of turds.
55
posted on
04/26/2008 5:21:13 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: Comparative Advantage
If he is this bad during the campaign, can you imagine what is coming when he is in office?
56
posted on
04/26/2008 5:23:16 AM PDT
by
Vision
("If God so clothes the grass of the field...will He not much more clothe you...?" -Matthew 6:30)
"A Shameful, Ugly Ad" A shameful ugly race baiter and his pal.
57
posted on
04/26/2008 5:24:15 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
((Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!))
To: freerepublic_or_die
Local NC papers are reporting that NAACP and Crystal Mangum (Duke Lacrosse) defender -- Rev William Barber (state NAACP President) are weighing in with words like this:
The group said the ad takes Wright's words out of context in an effort to smear the black community and "prophetic ministers." [the quotes are theirs].
Barber says: "It's a fundamentally race-baiting ad and it inserts racist sentiments."
Daves, NCGOP retorts: "This ad has absolutely NOTHING to do with race." Further Daves says: "the ad is completely factual" and that Dems are TRYING to inject the race issue into the discussion."
For some backstory not in the current article: Rev Barber also defends illegal immigrants "rights" at Smithfield Plants. He has asserted in past the reason anyone would go after "illegals" is because of their skin color.
Now, let's go back and review BO's Pennsylvania statements?
In my Obama Imitation: Rev Barber and his ilk cling to their cameras, their press releases, their bloviations, their obsession with skin color because they have nothing substantial to discuss, put forward, stand upon. It's their version of reality or no version.
In the worldview of a racialist, especially a paid racialist, there is nothing in the universe outside of skin color; and funny how they all seem to show up during an election "race".
58
posted on
04/26/2008 5:24:26 AM PDT
by
Alia
To: freerepublic_or_die
The US can’t take much more of the divisiveness of the NYT.
59
posted on
04/26/2008 5:25:18 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Huma for co-president!)
To: freerepublic_or_die
60
posted on
04/26/2008 5:27:31 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson