Skip to comments.
House GOP wants changes to rescue bill [Thr/Fri deadline? GOP balk at joining "political dead pool"]
TheHill.com ^
| September 27, 2008
Posted on 09/27/2008 7:50:20 PM PDT by TFine80
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
1
posted on
09/27/2008 7:50:22 PM PDT
by
TFine80
To: TFine80
Good for them. Stand strong!
To: TFine80
The Republicans should only sign on if the deal includes the resignations of Frank, Dodd and Schumer.
3
posted on
09/27/2008 7:52:49 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Palin for President! (PUMA))
To: TFine80
GOPers also want to eliminate a Democratic provision that would dedicate a portion of any profits from the eventual sale of purchased assets to an affordable housing fund the GOP has said would benefit groups tied to Democrats. So, the ACORN pork it is still in the bill. Mark my words, this will make it to the President's desk and he will sign it.
4
posted on
09/27/2008 7:54:01 PM PDT
by
CatOwner
To: TFine80
Pelosi said she wanted to “save the planet.” This is her big chance. She doesn’t need the GOP. She already has all the votes she needs with the DemocRATS.
5
posted on
09/27/2008 7:54:05 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(When Republicans do it, it's "corruption." When DemocRATS do it, it's a financial crisis.)
To: TFine80
Why doesn’t McCain go before TV cameras and say, “At this time when our financial system is teetering on the brink of disaster, the Democrats are trying to funnel billions of taxpayer dollars to a leftwing group associated with Senator Obama?”
6
posted on
09/27/2008 7:55:17 PM PDT
by
Inyokern
To: TFine80
The markets won’t like it but as long as there is action towards a resolution then the world won’t end. No action and allowing the financial system to collapse would be negligent though. There are some solutions out there that won’t completely screw the tax payer.
7
posted on
09/27/2008 7:55:37 PM PDT
by
misterrob
(Obama-Keep the Change!)
To: TFine80
The question I ask is will the markets wait until Thursday? Will the economy wait until Thursday? If this goes until Thursday, how much further will McCain/Palin fall in the polls or doesn’t that matter?
8
posted on
09/27/2008 7:57:27 PM PDT
by
teletech
(Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
To: TFine80
GOPers also want to eliminate a Democratic provision that would dedicate a portion of any profits from the eventual sale of purchased assets to an affordable housing fund the GOP has said would benefit groups tied to Democrats. Fear and dread of mentioning the acronym, "ACORN!" Gasp!
9
posted on
09/27/2008 7:58:27 PM PDT
by
unspun
(Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
To: TFine80
Well, it needs to happen by Sunday, if it doesn't happen by Sunday, it could be Thursday or Friday of next week, Blunt said. The longer it takes the better, might even be able to stretch it into never. Then we need to work on getting back the money paulson has already thrown away to his friends.
10
posted on
09/27/2008 7:58:27 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(Republicans should support the SAM Walton business model, and then drill???)
To: TFine80
GOPers also want to eliminate a Democratic provision that would dedicate a portion of any profits from the eventual sale of purchased assets to an affordable housing fund the GOP has said would benefit groups tied to Democrats. Fear and dread of mentioning the acronym, "ACORN!" Gasp!
11
posted on
09/27/2008 7:58:31 PM PDT
by
unspun
(Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
To: TFine80
Well, it needs to happen by Sunday, if it doesn't happen by Sunday, it could be Thursday or Friday of next week, Blunt said. The longer it takes the better, might even be able to stretch it into never. Then we need to work on getting back the money paulson has already thrown away to his friends.
12
posted on
09/27/2008 7:58:31 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(Republicans should support the SAM Walton business model, and then drill???)
To: Paladin2
Schumer was the one who insisted that we not give them the full 700 billion, he wants to dole it out according to results. Right now he appears to be thinking straight.
13
posted on
09/27/2008 7:58:39 PM PDT
by
B4Ranch
(I'd rather have a VP that can gut a Moose, than a President that wants to gut our Second Amendment!)
To: TFine80
If the market crashes Monday morning, it’ll be Pelosi’s fault. She had the votes and she failed to pull the trigger.
14
posted on
09/27/2008 7:59:07 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(When Republicans do it, it's "corruption." When DemocRATS do it, it's a financial crisis.)
To: Inyokern
Why doesnt McCain go before TV cameras and say, At this time when our financial system is teetering on the brink of disaster, the Democrats are trying to funnel billions of taxpayer dollars to a leftwing group associated with Senator Obama? He's being bipartisan. Means about the same as Bush's compassionate conservative.
15
posted on
09/27/2008 7:59:20 PM PDT
by
CatOwner
To: TFine80
Even if the doomsday scenario is true, if the Democrats pass
their bill, they will get no significant credit for it (except that contributions to Dem candidates from Goldman and Morgan will probably quintuple).
After all, even the gung-ho bailout boosters will tell you it's not going to cure the patient, the best it can do is stave off a seizure for a few months or years.
So six weeks after the bailout, economic life on Main Street will be no better than today.
Positioning the House GOP (and Senate GOP if they had any nads) to say - "The Dems gave their corporate benefactors $700 billion of your money - notice any improvements in your life?
Given public sentiment, seems like a winning position to me.
16
posted on
09/27/2008 7:59:34 PM PDT
by
Notary Sojac
(I'll back the bailout if Angelo Mozilo lets me borrow his Lamborghini on Saturday nights.)
To: teletech
17
posted on
09/27/2008 8:00:23 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(Republicans should support the SAM Walton business model, and then drill???)
To: TFine80
The reason the system will “Crash” is because of the runs on the money markets and the weaker banks (like Wachovia).
Why the money runs? Because people are concerned on their monies safety.
We can prevent this by simply raising the FDIC insured deposit amount to $1 million per account. Charge the banks a higher premium.
Most of the “runs” at least by individuals and small businesses is stopped.
Then we can sort this out without tossing $700 billion to Wall Street and foreign banks.
To: TFine80
The GOP House members are impotent, Pelosi could ram this through without them being able to do anything about it.
The just want them on board for political cover.
The are afraid the GOP would use it against them in November. That's why McCain should oppose it and let Bush and the Democrats defend this piece of tripe.
19
posted on
09/27/2008 8:03:38 PM PDT
by
Mikey_1962
(Obama: The Affirmative Action Candidate)
To: SteveAustin
We can prevent this by simply raising the FDIC insured deposit amount to $1 million per account. Charge the banks a higher premium. And those premium costs would be? I talked with someone today who has been in banking for 32 years, and she says increasing the premium costs of the FDIC insurance would likely cause several more banks teetering on the edge to fail. I don't we can afford that many more failures.
20
posted on
09/27/2008 8:08:56 PM PDT
by
CatOwner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson