Posted on 10/25/2008 1:07:16 AM PDT by Chet 99
Calling me a misogynist because I point out the obvious is no different then the libs calling anyone who criticizes the “one” a racist.
If you can offer up an explanation as to why women overwhelmingly support the Marxist, I’ll be happy to listen.
A couple of less votes for Obama and a couple of more for McCain. My wife has led her parents out of the darkness and into the light.
Of course I can't; I don't support 0bama and am proud to say I've never been able to understand why liberals do anything they do.
Tarring an entire gender with one wide, archaic, stereotypical brush and making comments about how we shouldn't be allowed to vote is misogynistic.
By the way, the VP candidate on the ticket that I, a woman voted for by absentee ballot a couple of weeks ago is a woman, in case you hadn't noticed.
Since it is the women who have Obama in the lead (if the polls are to be believed) it is they who will assume the responsibility as to what will befall us should he in fact prevail.
It is more then enough of a reason to question their mental prowess.
Until Sarah was selected I was not going to vote, now I will vote and do what I can to spread the word.
Anecdotal my wife does NOT like McCain. Know why? Is it because of his policies? no, she doesn’t care for him because “he has a temper”. You call this clear thinking? I have shown her reams of information about Hussein and I was very careful to avoid the really far out crap. I told her about his Reverend Wright assoc, his William Ayers and Fran Marshall Davis assoc, his vote to deny babies who survive abortions medical help and his subsequent LIE about it along with his many other on the record lies. I explained and showed her his plans for tax increases and his Party’s plans for a 25% cut in ther military budget, all to no avail. There is no reason to believe the other women who all seem to share the blind stupid allegiance to this nothing of a Marxist candidate have thought processes any different then those of my wife of some 40+ years.
I won't go into my reasons for not finding McCain worthy of my vote before Sarah, but his temper was not even on the radar.
So in the end she won’t vote for McCain because he “has a temper” buy will vote for the Marxist DESPITE his past and his on the record comments and actions. The only positive in the whole scenario is we live in NJ so it doesn’t really matter who either of us vote for since the fools here will ensure a Hussein victory in this State.
All I can do is suggest that whether women were finally seen as coequals in the eyes of the law or not there still would have been a Bama in our future.
In my little corner of this globe the males equal the females that support Bama. I am in Missouri and I will not be surprised with the plantings off the fruits of oak trees that B&B steal this state. So you are not alone in your frustration with the blindness that has crept across this nation like a cancer. It is striking to witness the willingness to come under the spell of a mindset bent upon destruction all in the name of 'hope' and 'change'. But it is NOT woman's fault alone.
Apparently this was NOT lost on the Founding Fathers. Their genius and foresight continues to be more impressive as each day unfolds on our Nations journey into the future.
Unfortunately, most of the women in this nation have historically voted for the man they would rather date.
I don't know how many conversations I have had with women where their voting choice was described as "cute." Although, in the 2000 election that sentiment was an obvious farce.
The women I know who are voting Obama this election are voting more against McCain, but none yet has given me a coherent policy reason for their vote.
Of course, these are all Undecided/Democrat women. Real republican women just don't think that way.
4 or 40. It’s winner take all, eh?
Blacks vote for liberals in even higher percentages. Are you also advocating that their rights to vote be taken away? Because going by your premise that would fall right in there.
It is a woman who energized McCain's campaign and gave him a fighting chance.
I suspect you're just a woman-hater. And you especially hate the smart, successful ones, correct? There are a lot of FReeper women who won't care for you going around saying we should not have the right to vote.
Perhaps not, but as their numbers in favor of the Marxist are overwhelming (according to the polls)the responsibility for his winning and the consequential effects thereof will rest with them.
There is no way to sugar coat this. If they follow through with their seeming beliefs and vote as the polls say they will then it is easy to see why they will be seen as exhibiting stupidity on a truly galactic level, not to mention a thought process totally lacking in foresight.
From my persepctive, McCain will carry NH.
1.) He has a long history with NH - 2000 and 2008. He’ll make a heartfelt appeal next weekend to NH.
2.) Many independents love him.
3.) There are ZERO inner cities; the black population is about 0.0001%; No ACORN
You are angry with your wife and the polls bolster your anger because you cannot convince her that Marxist are trained to cover their hate/anger. Notice how it was a mere plumber that got Bama to expose his Marxist plans.
There is no way to sugar coat this. If they follow through with their seeming beliefs and vote as the polls say they will then it is easy to see why they will be seen as exhibiting stupidity on a truly galactic level, not to mention a thought process totally lacking in foresight.
I think it to be more curious how your wife seemingly ignores what these 'peace' loving liberals willingly have done to Sarah just because she represents what they are filled with a raging hate to destroy. Maybe you ought to pretend to agree with her about McCain's temper and suggest that these 'peace' loving liberals are correct in putting that woman in her place?
First of all I clearly said "if the polls are right", so there is mistake number 1
I never said anyone's vote should be taken away, I merely opined the Founders seem to know what they were doing when they did not assign voting rights to women. You seem to be putting women in America in the same category as blacks. This is absurd on both a historical and political basis.
It is a woman who energized McCain's campaign and gave him a fighting chance.
I love Palin and it is not her I have a problem with. It is instead the seeming majority of women who fall for everything the press had and has to say about her. She was approved by far more people before the press started in on her with their baseless personal attacks. It seems the women bought into this more then any other group. It is clear they are not analytical and are driven almost exclusively by emotion.
I suspect you're just a woman-hater. And you especially hate the smart, successful ones, correct? There are a lot of FReeper women who won't care for you going around saying we should not have the right to vote.
LOL, you can slap all the tags on me you want, woman, but that makes you no different then the liberals who continually refer to all dissenters as either racists, bigots, homophobes, misogynists and the like. It's not important what you or anyone else thinks of my positions on anything. It is only important what I think of them. My belief is that ANYONE who supports the Marxist is suspect in the intelligence dept and it so happens there are far more women in this category then men.
If the shoe fits, wear it.
I noticed McCain spoke in NH this week. The Republican internals must have told them the Granite state is back in play.
All of the women I interact with daily at work are voting McCain-Palin. There are quite a few of us.
I'll pose the same question to you as I did to Voodoo. Blacks vote overwhelmingly Democrat in every election. Their reasons are most likely emotional as well.
Do you advocate taking away their right to vote?
The trends all seem to showing McCain closing. I am sure the Obama campaign wishes the race ended last week. Peaked too soon and I believe the American people have wakened up from their slumber. I pray that is the case.
In your case, your mouth seems a good fit for your shoe.
It is instead the seeming majority of women who fall for everything the press had and has to say about her.
Then perhaps you'd be better off expressing your anti-woman stance on another forum. You will not find much in the way of the type of woman you describe here.
LOL, you can slap all the tags on me you want, woman, but that makes you no different then (it's "than," FYI) the liberals who continually refer to all dissenters as either racists, bigots, homophobes, misogynists and the like.
You should probably watch that emotion-driven slander on my character, newbie. I've been around here a long time and there are too many who know that is not what I am.
First of all I clearly said "if the polls are right", so there is mistake number 1
And I said "...you appear to," as opposed to "you do, "so there's your mistake.
You seem to be putting women in America in the same category as blacks. This is absurd on both a historical and political basis.
Nope. Going by your premise regarding voting trends in specific demographics, it is not absurd at all.
It's not important what you or anyone else thinks of my positions on anything.
If you're going to post that position out in a public forum, be prepared to take what you've got coming.
I think it’s the ‘commie-pinko-b@s+@rd’ effect while Our Soldiers under fire & continue to be BDU wearing, fire-breathing, modern day miracle workers.
I’d be interested to know if BM (big media) has maintained it’s pace of the crass nightly use of US Casualties to bludgeon Bush.
Can’t dare remind Joe Public of Real-World dangers outside. Might help that Ol’ Man.
Nov. 5 bodes to be a massive Info-Dump from one great BM flush.
McCuda08/GOP2.0
the Deets
Well put! LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.