Posted on 11/26/2008 6:37:38 AM PST by IbJensen
why, do you have a problem using starch for ethanol production for some reason?
Learn how ethanol is made, from what it’s made before you form an opinion. Passing on BS generated by purely ignorant people isn’t very becoming.
What causes that is bad fuel , when the petroleum based fuel already has water in it. When it's blended with ethanol, it causes that water to precipitate out of the fuel. So if anything, ethanol is a good- "bad gasoline" detector. If the gasoline is good when ethanol is blended, say e10, any water entering the fuel tank will be ABSORBED by the ethanol, PREVENTING fuel line freeze up. That's why you DON'T need gas line antifreeze when using e10. Plus you get an octane boost from e10, giving you BETTER gasoline performance.
HOWEVER, I wouldn't recommend burning e85 unless the engine has been extensively modified to burn alcohol properly, taking advantage of it's properties. otherwise, you will get poor efficiency and miss out on a tremendous power increase. E10-25 is perfectly fine for regular gas cars however.
Pure ethanol itself can absorb 60% it's volume of water and STILL burn, without water precipitating out.
In fact you drink ethanol blended with water in even higher ratio's than that.
have you EVER seen water precipitate out of your whiskey?
Food grains are not used in ethanol production”
There is a direct relationship between corn production for ethanol and our food.
There is less corn to feed to beef cattle, pigs, and chickens.
That affects us in the price of meat and eggs.
The cost of milk has gone waaaay up to the dairy farmer because less acreage is being devoted to HAY production, as the fields are being used for ethanol corn production.
When all is said and done, there is still the pesky little problem of the amount of BTU’s that ethanol produces. It is approximately 2/3 of the amount of BTU’s the same amount of gasoline produces.
Time to take the BS out of this issue and get back to pure science.
I lose about 5-6 mpg in my hybrid every time ‘
I used to live in No Calif, where there is mandatory “winter blend” with 10% ethanol.
I lost at least 1-% mileage with that crap.
Shouldn't be. Ethanol sells at 1.67 a gallon. It only costs more when blended with gasoline, because the gasoline costs more. As for the crappy gas mileage, of course! Tune the car to burn ethanol. It won't run very good tuned to burn gas. Better yet take the engine to the speed shop and have them increase the compression ratio to about 17:1 instead of the 8.5:1 it currently is. Have them reprogram the advance curve to fit alcohol burning properties, as well as generally advancing the initial timing setting 20 degrees more advanced.
Then you'll not only get GREAT gas mileage, you'll be able to lay down some decent rubber too!.
But burning e85 in a gas engine is just plain waste full. No more than e25, which most electronic ignition systems can detect and compensate somewhat for. E10 is best for a regular gas engine.
For high alcohol content blends like E85, you simply MUST have a higher compression engine to get good value and power. If you had that, you would NEVER burn regular gas again.
Ethanol attacks elastomeric sealing devices more aggressively than does carbon-based fuel. This causes premature failure and ultimately the expensive engine overhauls.
The nanny-ninny liberal pansies know best for us.”
Remember when the Liberals changed the formula for deisel?
The change caused the fuel to eat up all the o-rins, seals, in the deisel engines. Large trucks/semi’s were stalled on roads all over the country.
Many of those trucks were owner/operators. Those repair costs came out of their pockets. Even the costs of repairs that the big outfits paid for were passed on to the consumers.
There is hardly a single action that the Feds and the Liberals dream up that does NOT have a negative impact somewhere.
And I have some real news for those of you who are total city slickers:
Milk doesn’t just come from SAFEWAY!!!!!
You are repeating very OLD news. Those warning exist only for those who still might have an old vehicle with natural rubber fuel hoses and gaskets.
Heck, even my old 1935 Minneapolis Moline uses cork because it was MADE to run on alcohol.
And BTW, the same warning exists when using modern fuels with MTBU additive. It attacks rubber as well. MTBU was added in place of lead.
Hay and alfalfa prices are through the roof because those fields have been tilled up to plant more corn and soybeans.
Without a cheap supply of hay for winter feed the beef become damn expensive to feed in the winter.
I raised hogs for years and could feed out a 250# hog for around $65 in feed. It now costs more than double that for the same feed from the same grain mill in just the last 2 years.
If that leftover slop was such great feed the meat prices should be down because the corn production has gone way up.
And just what 'expensive overhauls' might those be? replacing a fuel line? ($5) A carb kit? ($25)
You certainly won't blow an engine if your carb starts leaking fuel.
BS Alfalfa don't grow where corn grows, and corn don't grow where alfalfa grows.
Hay and alfalfa prices are through the roof because:
A) the price of fuel tripled,
B) the price of fertilizer tripled
NOT because commodity prices for a TON of feed corn went up $3/ton
Well, be sure to repeat it several times more before you try to find out.
Yes. They are so smart.
Now we have the new, reformulation edict of low sulphur content. It drives the cost up $1.00 over the cost of regular (unleaded) gasoline.
I know because I have two diesel autos.
These pansies we've elected to rule and ruin our lives are absolutely functionally illiterate.
And your source for that statement would be what? Can you define a 'seed quality' grain? Thanks for your time.
I've never seen a farmer BUY all his feed. They certainly wouldn't be a farmer for very long.
Same goes for hogs. they GRW their own feeds stuff, around these parts it's barley.
never try BS a farm boy.
“BS Alfalfa don’t grow where corn grows, and corn don’t grow where alfalfa grows.”
I’m done with this thread. Its obvious that you don’t know your a$$ from a grape on this subject!
There are arguments on both sides of that statement, dependent on which side of the ethanol/no ethanol lobby one sits.
Actually, corn based ethanol uses much more energy to produce than ethanol derived from switchgrass and other materials.
Oh, and also look up how much of the corn grown in America is used for human consumption (less than 1%) and even much of that goes unsold and ends up in landfills some years.
The USA is a food IMPORTER not a food exporter. (we import 76% of our food needs) Much of which gets tossed out.
The ratio is about 10:1. You get ten times the energy value in ethanol as was used to produce the energy.
It's about the same for oil pumped out of the ground, except much less disastrous on the environment.
Again,
http://www.ethanolproducer.com/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.