Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The DUI Exception to the Constitution
DUI Blog ^ | 2005 | Lawrence Taylor (not the Linebacker)

Posted on 12/31/2008 2:53:07 PM PST by Ron Jeremy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-660 next last
To: 1rudeboy
“If you are slight of build, or not a regular drinker, beware. “

Regular drinker has virtually no effect on BAC. As a former defense attorney I worked directly with DUI charges in over 1000 cases. With 2 glasses of wine (in 1 hour) I would NOT take the chance. Or with 2 beers (in 1 hour). Or with one ‘stiff’ bar drink in 1 hour. We here in AZ boast? the most stringent DUI laws in the country due mainly to a very active MADD group.

In my dealings with these idiots, I have found them to be even more radical than the tree-hugging faction by far. Totally irrational and out for blood. Most claim (often falsely) that they ‘had a daughter/son killed by a drunk’. In many cases the drunk was the kid driving their car who was as drunk as the family member killed. In some cases the drunk got drunk at the MADD mother's home and sometimes with their knowledge.

It seems that they are on a guilt trip and trying their damndest to transfer that to others.

I have had clients who were drunk but were broadsided by a sober idiot. Of course the fact that the sober kid caused the wreck is of no consequence.

I have serious questions about the current IR5000 breath test machine and if I was to take one, I would demand to see ALL calibration and performance records from both before and after mine.

As to blood testing, that is almost foolproof IF the chain of custody is clean. Very Happy New Year, everyone.

21 posted on 12/31/2008 3:22:08 PM PST by dbacks (God help the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

It should be mentioned that MADD soon became far too radical for its founder, Candy Lightner.


22 posted on 12/31/2008 3:23:01 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

I was pulled over in Arizona, and they were writing me a warning. Just before they were finished, they wanted to look into my mouth. They asked me when was the last time I smoked pot. I told them I wouldn’t answer. Then they wanted me to stand on one foot. But I couldn’t because I was nervous at that point, because I knew they were going to search my car. And I loan my car to these gypsy girls, and I hadn’t had a chance to sweep it for contraband since they last used it. They gave me a breathalyser, and I blew a zero. They cuffed me, towed away my car ($500) and threw me in jail for 24 hours. In the report, the cop said he noticed my eye twitch.

Charged with a DUI, and I was stone cold sober.

Trial is January 6th.

Wish me luck!


23 posted on 12/31/2008 3:25:34 PM PST by FoxPro (The SEC knew about Madoff, and did nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy
MADD no matter how well intentioned poses one of the greatest threats to individual liberty we face. I don't drive drunk but these people are lunatics
24 posted on 12/31/2008 3:26:28 PM PST by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert

That seems a little much, but what is so difficult about not driving after you have been drinking? DWIs are very, very expensive. Why risk it?


25 posted on 12/31/2008 3:26:44 PM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Driving a car is a PRIVILEGE, not a RIGHT.

You think the founding fathers would have thought that the right to travel the highways was a privilege and not a right? So since it is a privilege, should they also be able to stop and search and fingerprint you for no reason?

26 posted on 12/31/2008 3:26:59 PM PST by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

So if we break no laws, it’s OK for us to be abused by police?


27 posted on 12/31/2008 3:27:30 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nobama08
That seems a little much, but what is so difficult about not driving after you have been drinking? DWIs are very, very expensive. Why risk it?

We are talking about the ACCUSED here. Or, not even the accused. They do checkpoints and stop everybody.

28 posted on 12/31/2008 3:27:37 PM PST by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: steveo
I was in a jury pool once where the judge said “you don’t need to be over the limit to be guilty”. I never drive after even one drink.

Yes, that is the policy I take also.
29 posted on 12/31/2008 3:29:00 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dbacks

You are correct. I don’t know what I was thinking when I typed that . . . but I have been drinking, and enough to only walk past my car as I get another beer from the garage. (It’s 16F outside).


30 posted on 12/31/2008 3:29:05 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
If you really want to put a stop to drunk driving, do away with the roadblocks and the persecution of decent people and just put unmarked cruisers out on the highways or park them at bars and taverns. You will very quickly be able to identify the drunk drivers as those will be the ones swerving all over the place and being a menace to other drivers.

As the rest of traffic enforcement, the point isn't to catch the most dangerous offenders. It's to catch the most offenders.

To figure out why, just follow the money.

31 posted on 12/31/2008 3:30:41 PM PST by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy
I agreed to a commitment which will put me on the roads tonight, driving. I like the idea . . really like the idea . . .that the police are trying to keep us safe by locating drivers who have been drinking.

Use a designated driver and quit bitchin'.

32 posted on 12/31/2008 3:31:19 PM PST by BAW (need a new tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

So are you against the checkpoints or arresting people for DWI?


33 posted on 12/31/2008 3:32:11 PM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

What about making the laws more sensible and enforcement fairer?


34 posted on 12/31/2008 3:32:29 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
The Constitution guarantees NO ONE the right to get behind the wheel.

Oh come on, you know we haven't a system of positive rights. The Constitution guarantees no one any rights with regard automobiles. Or airplanes. Or radio.

35 posted on 12/31/2008 3:34:13 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

One glass of wine does not make one INTOXICATED!!!


36 posted on 12/31/2008 3:35:40 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert

That’s a pretty generalized statement. What specifically are you talking about? DWI in most states is .08. How is that not fair enforcement?


37 posted on 12/31/2008 3:35:43 PM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

Thank you for this important information. It is sickening that law enforcement has become a criminal enterprise.


38 posted on 12/31/2008 3:36:13 PM PST by loungitude (The truth hurts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

If you are arrested after having one glass of wine, your blood level is not .08


39 posted on 12/31/2008 3:37:03 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
Not legallly but it may affect someone’s ability to drive, especially those who don't drink often. I know I feel it after one glass of wine. Believe me, back in the day there were times I drove after consuming when I should not have. Thank God nothing ever happened. I am now older and wiser.:) I just wouldn't take that chance now.
40 posted on 12/31/2008 3:38:12 PM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-660 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson