Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh Responds to Obama [
National Review ^ | Saturday, January 24, 2009 | Byron York

Posted on 01/24/2009 3:53:58 PM PST by fiodora

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last
To: ozzymandus
Where’s the rest of your gang? Down at the dump shooting beer cans off each other’s heads?

LOL - What's funny is that you are probably right!

121 posted on 01/24/2009 7:58:10 PM PST by jla (Sarah! 45)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

And you worship the Janitor/President?


122 posted on 01/24/2009 8:06:29 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fiodora

Rush says that Obama’s plan would preclude tax cuts and then says the majority of Americans would pay no taxes.

He says that this is not what America wants and then says Obama’s policies would lead to a permanent Democrat majority.

These statements are clearly contradictory and are not based on logic. Rush seems a bit nervous as well he should be.

Remember Obama only needs conservatives if he does not want to cave in to the far left. Otherwise he just needs 1 RINO and there are easily 3 out there.

If Obama wants just a pure far left agenda he can do it without the GOP for at least 2 years. If he wants to be able to push through logical programs that are only slightly left of center and be able to ignore the 5 most radical lefties, he needs a few Republicans.

I pesonally think Rush is wrong on this count. He will certainly get a ratings boost though; and Rush has consistently shown that he is far more interested in his own success than in that of the United States.

Rush’s tactics have only led to the US getting a President further to the left than Hillary and still leaving the country in a position where Hillary could be President. It was a massive “own goal” and Rush is partly to blame. Of course he still got his $400 million so what does he care?


123 posted on 01/24/2009 11:51:26 PM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Bomb Liechtenstein!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JavaJumpy

You are FAR classier than I am, my friend.
I would have been “all up in their faces.”
Typical O supporters - totally CLUELESS of his ideas and plans and they don’t want to know!


124 posted on 01/25/2009 6:32:32 AM PST by a real Sheila (Obama REALLY IS an AFRICAN American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

A lot of what Rush says makes common sense, that’s the appeal of Rush. Putting aside Rush’s response, and it’s a good one I think, I also think it that obama’s remarks to the republicans about listening to Rush was very unpresidential. It was noise from a completely boneheaded loser.


125 posted on 01/25/2009 8:01:42 AM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: databoss

True, but I have been thrown out of classier bars than this one!


126 posted on 01/25/2009 10:18:07 AM PST by Redleg Duke ("Sarah Palin...Unleashing the Fury of the Castrated Left!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

don’t drink while posting...


127 posted on 01/25/2009 11:21:28 AM PST by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

Liberals are so filled with hate, jealousy, and a hunger to control others, that it seems that this country has produced a generation full of little Napoleons. I think that poster is one of them.


128 posted on 01/26/2009 8:59:14 AM PST by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Gunder
Don’t these Dems realize how petty they look when they try to attack talk show hosts?

No matter what, the left always plays to it's base.

These would be the drug-addled losers who constantly complain about getting exactly what they voted for.

129 posted on 01/26/2009 9:10:51 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Starfleet Command; humblegunner

Don’t be to harsh, humblegunner probably is getting his period and is a bit cranky.


130 posted on 01/30/2009 3:17:34 AM PST by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson