Skip to comments.
A Slow Burn Becomes a Raging Fire- Disdain for U.S. Policies May Have Led to Alleged Spying for Cuba
Washington Post ^
| June 7, 2009
| Mary Beth Sheridan and Del Quentin Wilber
Posted on 06/07/2009 5:35:00 AM PDT by La Lydia
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: GladesGuru
Why the children of the affluent become prone to socialism has always been a matter of wonder to me, especially considering what happens to such people under socialism.My thoughts, exactly. This line from the article caught my eye.
the marina in Anne Arundel County where the Myerses docked their 38-foot sloop
Did they ever wonder why average Cubans didn't own 38 foot sloops? You have to shake your head at well-to-do leftists who've lived off the incredible wealth of capitalism all their lives but swoon over the deprivation and misery caused by their socialist heroes.
41
posted on
06/07/2009 10:31:41 AM PDT
by
BfloGuy
(It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
To: GladesGuru
The children of the wealthy adore socialism because socilaism offers even more privilges to the elite than even the waelthy have in a free country — what the wealthy and the Bolshies have in common is the desire to concentrate capital in the hands of as few as possible — the Bolshies achieve this in a way that even the Rockefellers envy.
42
posted on
06/07/2009 11:22:55 AM PDT
by
kabumpo
(Kabumpo)
To: PapaBear3625
A planned economy is attractive to people with the arrogance to presume that they would be in the planning class.
THAT IS EXACTLY IT. It never occurs to them that they might be on the receiving end, with the peons.
43
posted on
06/07/2009 11:25:39 AM PDT
by
kabumpo
(Kabumpo)
To: kabumpo
I recall after WWII and the growth of communism in the US, they did infest the government, especially the State Dept. Also significant sized colonies of wealthy families became communists developed. It seems there was a large pocket of them on Long Island, as an example. When things began to get hot for them, some of the hard core affluent fled to Mexico City where they set up an enclave and center of communist influence. I understand they remain active there.
44
posted on
06/07/2009 1:02:13 PM PDT
by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
To: cookcounty
Help me out here. I read Armondo Valladares about the Cuban prisons. Truly soul destroying.
I googled Raoul Valladares and came up with very little.
??
45
posted on
06/07/2009 1:38:04 PM PDT
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: La Lydia
How can you hate Bush for waterboarding and love Castro for real torture and murder?
There is no liberal on earth who can give a rational answer.
46
posted on
06/15/2009 5:05:00 PM PDT
by
reasonisfaith
(Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
To: La Lydia
A non-starter as a defense - they'd already been at it for twenty years by the time Bush came along. MICE - money, ideology, compromise, ego. With these folks it was ideology.
It will be interesting to see who in the media defends them. Why is fairly clear - a shared ideology.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson