U.S. Banks Putting 'Lipstick on a Pig'

Seeking Alpha ^ | June 07, 2009 | Jeff Nielson

[bill1952]

Armed rev isn't the answer.

...And we need to embolden them and ourselves to get aggressively in the faces of the Leftists (and those who tangentially support them from their special-interest groups) and back them off, shut them up, and close them down.

By taking away the option of using arms, then that goal is forever denied you.

Do you thinks that the US can succeed in foreign policy without such an option?

Why then should our options be so limited?
What else is the 2nd amendment for?

--------------------------------------------

As our enemies have found we can reason like men, so now let us show them we can fight like men also.

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.

- thomas jefferson

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

Of course it’s always an option.

But don’t think that revolt is the same today as it was then. It’s not. And it would be far more difficult to throw off a globally oppressive regime today than it was to throw off England 225 years ago.

If it comes to that, it come to that. But let’s hope we can change the minds of the majorities and preserve our liberty that way.