Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PICTURES: General Atomics reveals Predator C 'Avenger' UAV
Flight Global ^ | April 21, 2009 | Stephen Trimble

Posted on 07/29/2009 6:37:03 PM PDT by myknowledge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: PIF

You can use computers. When they drone detects an intruder, the computer can follow a predetermined set of instructions to shoot it down with an AA missile from long range.

You put 3 drones in the area. Two drones are protecting the main drone. The fighters fly a figure 8 until they detect a bogey. They intercept it and kill it. Meanwhile the other drone does its job.


41 posted on 07/30/2009 1:21:36 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
That scenario only works if the signals from the controllers aren't being jammed and the transmitting satellites still in orbit.

The Ruskies have some really neat jamming equipment.

Any serious war scenario will see the satellites become orbiting junk, and the controllers’ signals go no further than line of sight.

Meanwhile, the Flankers and PACs will rule the sky while those woop-de-do drones spiral into the ground. So much for trying to achieve air-superiority on the cheap.

42 posted on 07/30/2009 4:02:26 PM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Nano-UAVs are going to be a big improvement over sending troops (or as a supplement to sending in troops to do the mopping up), eventually; delivered by plane, missile (like plastic paratroopers on the 4th of July), or larger UAV, they’ll collect and beam back mountains of surveillance, be basically impossible to shoot down, and in time will even be weaponized to basically annihilate opposing forces (particularly guerrila forces) in the field.


43 posted on 07/30/2009 5:58:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“Nano-UAVs are going to be a big improvement...”

“Going to be” is the operative phrase - and when the Obama/Gates/Dems see any chance those thing might work as you advertize, there will suddenly be homeless to feed first, just like the F22, and soon the F35, and then NASA’s manned space program.

This is not a march toward effective weapons - cheap or otherwise - it is about uniltaerally disarming the US by removing one effective weapon at a time, while promising something better which has yet to be produced - like the F35 and your beloved Nano-UAVs.


44 posted on 07/31/2009 5:08:19 AM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PIF; MindBender26; AppyPappy

You’re correct there.

I’d take manned Gen 5 fighters like the Raptor over a UAV any day.

That’s because you cannot jam a human pilot in a jet fighter whereas you can jam the datalink systems in UAVs.


45 posted on 08/02/2009 6:34:51 PM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

You don’t need a datalink to launch an AMRAAM against a bogey


46 posted on 08/02/2009 7:16:48 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I meant the datalink connection between the GCS and the UAV.

It can be jammed or have the satellites destroyed.


47 posted on 08/03/2009 3:19:50 PM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson